Market Structure Across Retail Formats

References

• Allenby G. M. A unified approach to identifying, estimating and testing demand structures with aggregate scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(3):265–281Link, Google Scholar
• Allenby G., Lenk P. Modeling household purchase behavior with logistic normal regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1994) 89(428):1218–1231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allenby G., Rossi P. Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. J. Econometrics (1999) 89(1–2):57–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell D., Lattin J. Shopping behavior and consumer preference for store price format: Why large basket shoppers prefer EDLP. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):66–88Link, Google Scholar
• Bell D., Ho T.-H., Tang C. S. Determining where to shop: Fixed and variable costs of shopping. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(33):352–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow E. T., Park Y.-H. Bayesian estimation of bid sequences in Internet auctions using a generalized record-breaking model. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):218–229Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. Heterogeneous logit model implications for brand positioning. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31:304–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. Inertia and variety seeking in a model of brand purchase timing. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):253–272Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P., Dubé J.-P., Singh V., Franses P. H., Montgomery A. L. Market structure across stores: An application of a random coefficients logit model with store-level data. Econometric Models in Marketing: Advances in Econometrics (2002) 16(JAI Press, Amsterdam) 191–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P., Dubé J.-P., Singh V. Balancing profitability and customer welfare in a supermarket chain. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(1):111–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper L. G. Competitive maps: The structure underlying asymmetric cross elasticities. Management Sci. (1988) 34(6):707–723Link, Google Scholar
• Day G. S., Shocker A. D., Srivastava R. K. Customer-oriented approaches to identifying product-markets. J. Marketing (1979) 43(4):8–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elrod T. Choice map: Inferring a product market map from panel data. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(1):21–40Link, Google Scholar
• Elrod T., Keane M. A factor-analytic-probit model for representing the market structure in panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(1):1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elrod T., Russell G. J., Shocker A. D., Andrews R. L., Bacon L., Bayus B. L., Carroll J. D., et al. Inferring market structure from customer response to competing and complementary products. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(3):221–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T. A dynamic analysis of market structure based on panel data. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(4):359–378Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T. An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):339–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Keane M. Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Winer R. Econometric modeling of competition: A multi-category choice-based mapping approach. J. Econometrics (1999) 89(1–2):159–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox E. J., Montgomery A. L., Lodish L. M. Consumer shopping and spending across retail formats. J. Bus. (2004) 77(2):S25–S60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelfand A., Smith A. Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1990) 85(410):398–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gogoi P. A supermarket war in the store. BusinessWeek Online (2006) January 24). http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jan2006/nf20060124_6416_db016.htm?campaign_id=tbwGoogle Scholar
• Gonul F., Ter Hofstede F. How to compute optimal catalog mailing decisions. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):65–74Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta S., Chintagunta P. On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(1):128–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch S., Drèze X., Purk M. E. EDLP, Hi-Lo, and margin arithmetic. J. Marketing (1994) 58(4):16–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horsky D., Misra S., Nelson P. Observed and unobserved preference heterogeneity in brand-choice models. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(4):322–335Link, Google Scholar
• Kamakura W., Russell G. Probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(4):379–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kannan P. K., Wright G. P. On testing competitive market structures. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(4):338–347Link, Google Scholar
• Keane M. Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1997) 15(3):310–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R., Rao R. Supermarket competition: The case of everyday low-pricing. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(1):60–80Link, Google Scholar
• McCulloch R., Rossi P. An exact likelihood approach to analysis of the multinomal probit model. J. Econometrics (1994) 64(1–2):207–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Messinger P., Narasimhan C. A model of retail formats based on consumers economizing on shopping time. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(1):1–23Link, Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy V., DeSarbo W. S. SCULPTRE: A new methodology for deriving and analyzing hierarchical product-market structures from panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(4):418–427Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi P., McCulloch R., Allenby G. On the value of household purchase history information in target marketing. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(4):321–340Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Estimating brand positioning maps using supermarket scanning data. J. Marketing Res. (1987) 24(1):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh V., Hansen K., Blattberg R. Market entry and consumer behavior: An investigation of a Wal-Mart supercenter. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):457–476Link, Google Scholar
• Singh V., Hansen K., Gupta S. Modeling preferences for common attributes in multi-category brand choice. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(2):195–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soberman D., Gatignon H. Research issues at the boundary of competitive dynamics and market evolution. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):165–174Link, Google Scholar
• Whole Foods Market Whole Foods Market 2006 Annual Report. (2006) (Whole Foods Market, Inc., Austin, TX) Google Scholar
• Yang S., Allenby G. M., Fennell G. Modeling variation in brand preference: The roles of objective environment and motivating conditions. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(1):14–31Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu T., Singh V., Dukes A. Local competition, entry, and agglomeration. (2005) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar