Price Competition in Markets with Consumer Variety Seeking

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0434

References

  • Acquisiti A., Varian H. R. Conditioning prices on purchase history. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):367–381LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bawa K. Modeling inertia and variety seeking tendencies in brand choice behavior. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(3):263–278LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beggs A., Klemperer P. Multi-period competition with switching costs. Econometrica (1992) 60(3):651–666CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brickman P., D'Amato B. Exposure effects in a free-choice situation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1975) 32(3):415–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caminal R., Matutes C. Endogenous switching costs in a duopoly model. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1990) 8:353–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Che H., Sudhir K., Seetharaman P. B. Bounded rationality in pricing under state dependent demand: Do firms look ahead? How far ahead? J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(3):434–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., Iyer G. Consumer addressability and customized pricing. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(2):197–208LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta P. K., Rao V. R. Pricing strategies in a dynamic duopoly: A differential game model. Management Sci. (1996) 42(11):1501–1514LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coombs C. H., Avrunin G. S. Single-peaked functions and theory of preference. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84:216–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T. A dynamic analysis of market structure based on panel data. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(4):359–378LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Farquhar P. H., Rao V. R. A balance model for evaluating subsets of multi-attributed items. Management Sci. (1976) 5(5):528–539LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feinberg F. M., Kahn B. E., McAlister L. Market share response when consumers seek variety. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(2):227–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Givon M. Variety seeking through brand switching. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(1):1–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guo L. Consumption flexibility, product configuration, and market competition. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(2):116–130LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland A. P., Jain S. Brand preference over time: A partially deterministic operationalization of the notion of variety seeking. Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, 43, AMA 1978 Educators' Proceedings (1978) (American Marketing Association, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Kahn B. E. Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services. J. Retailing Consumer Services (1995) 2(3):139–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn B. E., Kalwani M. U., Morrison D. G. Measuring variety-seeking and reinforcement behaviors using panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23(2):89–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J., Allenby G. M., Rossi P. E. Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(3):229–250LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klemperer P. Markets with consumer switching costs. Quart. J. Econom. (1987a) 102(1):375–394CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klemperer P. The competitiveness of markets with switching costs. RAND J. Econom. (1987b) 18(1):138–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klemperer P. Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1995) 62(213):515–539CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lattin J. M. A model of balanced choice behavior. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(1):48–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lattin J. M., McAlister L. Using a variety-seeking model to identify substitute and complementary relationships among competing products. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(4):330–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAlister L. Choosing multiple items from a product class. J. Consumer Res. (1979) 9(3):141–150Google Scholar
  • McAlister L. A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety-seeking behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 6(4):213–224Google Scholar
  • McAlister L., Pessemier E. Variety-seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(3):311–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raju P. S. Optimal stimulation level: Its relationship to personality, demographics and exploratory behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(4):272–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratner R. K., Kahn B. E., Kahneman D. Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. J. Consumer Res. (1999) 26(1):1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy R., Chintagunta P. K., Haldar S. A framework for investigating habits, the hand of the past and heterogeneity in dynamic brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(3):280–299LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seetharaman P. B. Probabilistic versus random utility models of state dependence: An empirical comparison. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2003) 20(1):87–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seetharaman P. B. Modeling multiple sources of state dependence in random utility models: A distributed lag approach. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):263–271LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seetharaman P. B., Chintagunta P. K. A model of inertia and variety seeking with marketing variables. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1998) 15(1):1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seetharaman P. B., Ainslie A., Chintagunta P. K. Investigating household state dependence effects across categories. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(4):488–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonson I., Winer R. S. The influence of purchase quantity and display format on consumer preference for variety. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 19(2):133–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trivedi M., Bass F. M., Rao R. C. A model of stochastic variety-seeking. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(3):274–297LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Villas-Boas J. M. Consumer learning, brand loyalty and competition. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):134–145LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh J. W. Flexibility in consumer purchasing for uncertain future tastes. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(2):148–165LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B. Brand loyalty and market equilibrium. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(3):229–245LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Z. J., Krishna A., Dhar S. K. The optimal choice of promotion vehicles: Front-loaded or rear-loaded incentives? Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):348–362LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman M.Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal (1979) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.