A Model for the Construction of Country-Specific Yet Internationally Comparable Short-Form Marketing Scales

References

• Aaker J. L., Benet-Martínez V., Garolera J. Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constructs. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81(3):492–508Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker F. B.The Basics of Item Response Theory (2001) (ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland, College Park) Google Scholar
• Batra R., Ramaswamy V., Alden D. L., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Ramachander S. Effects of brand local and nonlocal origin on consumer attitudes in developing countries. J. Consumer Psych. (2000) 9(2):83–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H. Issues in assessing measurement invariance in cross-national research. (2004) Presentation, Sheth Foundation/Sudman Symposium Cross-Cultural Survey ResearchUniversity of Illinois, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
• Baumgartner H., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M. An extended paradigm for measurement analysis applicable to panel data. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(August):431–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden W. O., Netemeyer R. G.Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-Item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research (1999) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden W. O., Netemeyer R. G., Teel J. E. Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 15(March):473–481Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden W. O., Netemeyer R. G., Teel J. E., Goldberg M. E., Gorn G., Pollay R. W. Further validation of the consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence scale. Advances in Consumer Research (1990) 17(Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT) 770–776Google Scholar
• Béguin A. A., Glas C. A. W. MCMC estimation and some model-fit analysis of multidimensional IRT models. Psychometrika (2001) 66(4):541–562Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benet-Martínez V., John O. P. Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998) 75(3):729–750Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. Robust convex optimization. Math. Oper. Res. (1998) 23(4):769–805Link, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. Robust solutions to uncertain linear programs. Oper. Res. Lett. (1999) 25(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math. Programming (2000) 88(3):411–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergkvist L., Rossiter J. R. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(May):175–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry J. W. On cross-cultural comparability. Internat. J. Psych. (1969) 4(2):119–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohlmann J. D., Rosa J. A., Bolton R. N., Qualls W. D. The effect of group interactions on satisfaction judgments: Satisfaction escalation. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(4):301–321Link, Google Scholar
• Bollen K. A.Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton R. N. From the editor. J. Marketing (2003) 67(January):1–3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow E. T., Fitzsimons G. J. Subscale distance and item clustering effects in self-administered surveys: A new metric. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(May):254–261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow E. T., Wainer H. Some statistical and logical considerations when rescoring tests. Statistica Sinica (1998) 8:713–728Google Scholar
• Bradlow E. T., Wainer H., Wang X. A Bayesian random effects model for testlets. Psychometrika (1999) 64(2):153–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Browne M. W. Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. (1984) 37(1):62–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruner G. C., Hensel P. J.Marketing Scales Handbook: A Compilation of Multi-Item Measures (1992) (American Marketing Association, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Burgess S. M., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M. Marketing renaissance: How research in emerging markets advances marketing science and practice. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2006) 23(4):337–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung G. W., Rensvold R. B. Evaluating goodness-of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling (2002) 9(2):233–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craig C. S., Douglas S. P.International Marketing Research (2001) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• De Boeck P., Wilson M.Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach (2004) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Jong M. G., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Fox J.-P. Relaxing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research using a hierarchical IRT model. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34(August):260–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H. M. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(May):269–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodd B. G., De Ayala R. J., Koch W. R. Computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Appl. Psych. Measurement (1995) 19(1):5–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flora D. B., Curran P. J. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psych. Methods (2004) 9(4):466–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fraley C. R., Waller N. G., Brennan K. A. An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 78(2):350–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerbing D. W., Anderson J. C. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(May):186–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Tull D. S., Albaum G.Research for Marketing Decisions (1988) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Gupta S., Zeithaml V. A. Customer metrics and their impact on financial performance. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):718–739Link, Google Scholar
• Hambleton R. K., Swaminathan H.Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications (1985) (Kluwer-Nijhof, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambleton R. K., Swaminathan H., Rogers H. J.Fundamentals of Item Response Theory (1991) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Hofstede G.Culture's Consequences (2001) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Ip E. H.-S. Adjusting for information inflation due to local dependency in moderately large item clusters. Psychometrika (2000) 65(1):73–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvis C. B., MacKenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model specification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(September):199–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson V. E., Albert J. H.Ordinal Data Modeling (1999) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Johnson M. S., Sinharay S., Bradlow E. T., Rao C. R., Sinharay S. Hierarchical item response theory. Handbook of Statistics (2006) 26(Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam) 587–604Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K. G. Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika (1971) 36(4):409–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar V.International Marketing Research (2000) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Lord F. M., Novick M. R.Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1968) (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Lubke G. H., Muthén B. O. Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structural Equation Model. (2004) 11(4):514–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• May H. A multilevel Bayesian IRT method for scaling socioeconomic status in international studies of education. J. Educational Behav. Statist. (2006) 31(Spring):63–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Netemeyer R. G., Bearden W. O., Sharma S. C.Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications (2003) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostini R., Nering M. L.Polytomous Item Response Theory Models (2005) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Raju N. S., Byrne B. M., Laffitte L. J. Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(3):517–529Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reise S. P., Widaman K. F., Pugh R. H. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psych. Bull. (1993) 114(3):552–566Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richins M. L. The material values scale: A re-inquiry into its measurement properties and the development of a short form. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(S1):209–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samejima F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement (1969) 17:1–100Google Scholar
• Sen S., Gürhan-Canli Z., Morwitz V. G. Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(December):399–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimp T. A., Sharma S. Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. J. Marketing Res. (1987) 24(August):280–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Who is afraid to give freedom of speech to marketing folks? Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):403–410(Editorial.)Link, Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter D. J., Best N. G., Carlin B. P., van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (2002) 64(October):583–639Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J.-B. E. M. Moving out of the U.S. silo: A call to arms for conducting international marketing research. J. Marketing (2005) 69(October):6–8Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Baumgartner H. Development and cross-cultural validation of a short form of CSI as a measure of optimum stimulation level. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1995) 12(2):97–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(June):78–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Gielens K. Consumer and market drivers of the trial rate of new consumer products. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(December):368–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stremersch S., Verhoef P. C. Globalization of authorship in the marketing discipline: Does it help or hinder the field? Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):585–594Link, Google Scholar
• Tanner M. A., Wong W. H. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1987) 82(398):528–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ter Hofstede F., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Wedel M. International market segmentation based on consumer-product relations. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(February):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson E. R. Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). J. Cross-Cultural Psych. (2007) 38(March):227–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Florès L. Adaptive idea screening using consumers. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):342–360Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Hauser J. R., Simester D. I. Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(February):116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Simester D. I., Hauser J. R., Dahan E. Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):273–303Link, Google Scholar
• Tuerlinckx F., De Boeck P., De Boeck P., Wilson M. Models for residual dependencies. Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach (2004) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 289–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandenberg R. J., Lance C. E. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods (2000) 3(1):4–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Linden W. J.Linear Models for Optimal Test Design (2005) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Linden W. J., Boekkooi-Timminga E. A maximin model for test design with practical constraints. Psychometrika (1989) 54(2):237–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Rijn P. W., Eggen T. J. H. M., Hemker B. T., Sanders P. F. Evaluation of selection procedures for computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Appl. Psych. Measurement (2002) 26(4):393–411Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veldkamp B. P. Multiple objective test assembly problems. J. Educational Measurement (1999) 36(Autumn):253–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wainer H., Bradlow E. T., Du Z., Van der Linden W. J., Glas C. A. W. Testlet response theory: An analog for the 3-PL useful in testlet-based adaptive testing. Computerized Adaptive Testing, Theory and Practice (2000) (Kluwer-Nijhof, Boston) 245–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang X., Bradlow E. T., Wainer H. A general Bayesian model for testlets: Theory and applications. Appl. Psych. Measurement (2002) 26(March):109–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winer R. S. From the editor. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(February):iii–ivCrossref, Google Scholar
• Wooten D. B., Reed A. Playing it safe: Susceptibility to normative influence and protective self-presentation. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(December):551–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang S., Allenby G. M. Modeling interdependent consumer preferences. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(August):282–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang S., Narayan V., Assael H. Estimating the interdependence of television program viewership between spouses: A Bayesian simultaneous equation model. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(4):336–349Link, Google Scholar