Rejoinder—Robust Prediction and Unrealistic Assumptions

References

• Balcerowicz L.Socialism, Capitalism, Transformation (1996) (Central European University Press, Budapest) Google Scholar
• Buckley P. J., Chapman M. The perception and measurement of transaction costs. Cambridge J. Econom. (1997) 21(2):127–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J., Shugan S. M. Film critics: Influencers or predictors? J. Marketing (1997) 61(2):68–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. K.The Good Society: The Humane Agenda (1996) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Hempel C. G. Geometry and empirical science. Amer. Math. Monthly (1945) 52(1):7–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. M. O male factum: Rectilinearity and Kepler's discovery of the ellipse. J. Hist. Astronomy (2008) 39(1):43–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Musgrave A. “Unreal assumptions” in economic theory: The F-twist untwisted. Kyklos (1981) 34(3):377–387Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagel E. Assumptions in economic theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1963) 53(2):211–219Google Scholar
• Robins J. A. Organizational economics: Notes on the use of transaction-cost theory in the study of organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1987) 32(1):68–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. It's the findings, stupid, not the assumptions. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(4):449–459Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Relevancy is robust prediction, not alleged realism. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(5):991–998Link, Google Scholar
• Tsang E. W. K. Behavioral assumptions and theory development: The case of transaction cost economics. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(11):999–1011Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsang E. W. K., Kwan K.-M. Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(4):759–780Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar