Commentary—Discussion of “Alleviating the Constant Stochastic Variance Assumption in Decision Research: Theory, Measurement, and Experimental Test”

References

• Adamowicz W., Louviere J., Williams M. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1994) 26:271–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adamowicz W., Swait J., Boxall P., Louviere J., Williams M. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1997) 32:65–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adamowicz W., Bunch D., Cameron T. A., Dellaert B. G. C., Hanneman M., Keane M., Louviere J., Meyer R., Steenburgh T., Swait J. Behavioral frontiers in choice modeling. Marketing Lett. (2008) 19(3/4):215–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Predict Travel Demand (1985) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• DeShazo J. R., Fermo G. Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency. J. Environ. Econom. Management (2002) 44(1):123–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiebig D. G., Keane M. P., Louviere J. J., Wasi N. The generalized multinomial logit model: Accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Marketing Sci. (2009) . ePub ahead of print July 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0508Google Scholar
• Islam T., Louviere J. J., Burke P. F. Modeling the effects of including/excluding attributes in choice experiments on systematic and random components. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2007) 24(4):289–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn T.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J. What if consumer experiments impact variances as well as means? Response variability as a behavioral phenomenon. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(3):506–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J. What you don't know might hurt you: Some unresolved issues in the design and analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environ. Resource Econom. (2006) 34(1):173–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J., Eagle T. Confound it! That pesky little scale constant messes up our convenient assumptions! Proc. 2006 Sawtooth Software Conf. (2006) Delray Beach, FL(Sawtooth Software Inc., Sequim, WA) 211–228Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J., Meyer R. J., Malhotra N. K. Formal choice models of informal choices: What choice modeling research can (and can't) learn from behavioral theory. Review of Marketing Research (2007) 4(M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) 3–32Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J., Hensher D. A., Swait J.Stated Choice Methods (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J., Islam T., Wasi N., Street D., Burgess L. Designing discrete choice experiments: Do optimal designs come at a price? J. Consumer Res. (2008) 35(2):360–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J., Street D., Burgess L., Wasi N., Islam I., Marley A. A. J. Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information. J. Choice Model. (2008) 1(1):128–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere J., Street D., Carson R., Ainslie A., DeShazo J. R., Cameron T., Hensher D., Kohn R., Marley T. Dissecting the random component of utility. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(3):177–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere J., Train K., Ben-Akiva M., Bhat C., Brownstone D., Cameron T. A., Carson R., et al. Recent progress on endogeneity in choice modeling. Marketing Lett. (2005) 16(3/4):255–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morikawa T. Incorporating stated preference data in travel demand analysis. (1989) . Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Ohler T., Le A., Louviere J. J., Swait J. Attribute range effects in binary response tasks. Marketing Lett. (2000) 11(3):249–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salisbury L., Feinberg F. Alleviating the constant stochastic variance assumption in decision research: Theory, measurement, and experimental test. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(1):1–17Link, Google Scholar
• Street D. J., Burgess L.The Construction of Optimal Stated Choice Experiments: Theory and Methods (2007) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait J., Kanninen B. J. Advanced choice models. Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Methods: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice (2006) (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 229–293Google Scholar
• Swait J., Adamowicz W. Choice environment, market complexity, and consumer behavior: A theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complexity into models of consumer choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2001) 86(2):141–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait J., Andrews R. Enriching scanner panel models with choice experiments. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):442–460Link, Google Scholar
• Swait J. D., Louviere J. J. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(3):305–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait J., Adamowicz W., van Bueren M. Choice and temporal welfare impacts: Incorporating history into discrete choice models. J. Environ. Management Econom. (2004) 47:94–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yatchew A., Griliches Z. Specification error in probit models. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1985) 67(1):134–139Crossref, Google Scholar