Practice Prize Winner—Pricing Digital Content Product Lines: A Model and Application for the National Academies Press

References

• Adams W., Yellen J. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. (1976) 90(3):475–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alberini A. Optimal designs for discrete choice contingent valuation surveys: Single-bound, double-bound, and bivariate models. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1995) 28(3):287–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucklin R. E., Sismeiro C. A model of Web site browsing behavior estimated on clickstream data. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(3):249–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung J., Rao V. R. A general choice model for bundles with multiple category products: Application to market segmentation and pricing of bundles. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(2):115–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. A., Jehoshua E., Ho T. H. An anatomy of a decision support system for developing and launching line extensions. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):117–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dayton C. M.Latent Class Scaling Analysis (1998) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekimpe M., Hanssens D. M. Sustained spending and persistent response: A new look at long-term marketing profitability. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(November):397–412Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekimpe M., Hanssens D. M., Lehmann D., Moorman C. Persistence modeling for assessing marketing strategy performance. Assessing Marketing Strategy Performance (2004) (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) 69–93Google Scholar
• Dickey D. A., Fuller W. A. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1979) 74(366):427–431Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobson G., Kalish S. Positioning and pricing a product line. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):107–125Link, Google Scholar
• Dobson G., Kalish S. Heuristics for pricing and positioning a product line using conjoint and cost data. Management Sci. (1993) 39(2):160–175Link, Google Scholar
• Enders W.Applied Econometric Time Series (2003) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Farquhar P. H., Rao V. R. A balance model for evaluating subsets of multiattributed items. Management Sci. (1976) 22(5):528–539Link, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Krieger A. M. Models and heuristics for product line selection. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(4):1–19Link, Google Scholar
• Jain S. Digital piracy: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(4):610–626Link, Google Scholar
• Kamakura W. A., Russell G. J. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(4):379–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Mahajan V. A reservation-price model for optimal pricing of multi-attribute products in conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(3):347–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Sukumar R. Heuristics for product-line design using conjoint analysis. Management Sci. (1990) 36(12):1464–1478Link, Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski D., Phillips P. C. B., Schmidt P., Shin Y. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J. Econometrics (1992) 54(1–3):159–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarfeld P. F., Henry N. W.Latent Structure Analysis (1968) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Liu Y., Weinberg C. B. Are nonprofits unfair competitors for businesses? An analytical approach. J. Public Policy Marketing (2004) 23(1):65–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski C., Lerman S. The estimation of choice probabilities from choice-based samples. Econometrica (1977) 45(8):1977–1988Crossref, Google Scholar
• McConnell K. E. Models for referendum data: The structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1990) 18(1):19–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe W., Fader P. S. Dynamic conversion behavior at e-commerce sites. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):326–335Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S., Png I. P. L. Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):345–359Link, Google Scholar
• Morrison D. G. Purchase intentions and purchase behavior. J. Marketing (1979) 43(2):65–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussa M., Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory (1978) 18(2):301–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels K., Srinivasan S., Silva-Risso J., Hanssens D. M. New products, sales promotions and firm value, with application to the automobile industry. J. Marketing (2004) 68(4):142–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reibstein D., Gatignon H. Optimal product line pricing: The influence of elasticities and cross-elasticities. J. Marketing Res. (1984) 21(3):259–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalansee R. Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. J. Bus. (1984) 57(1):S211–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinha R. K., Mandel N. Preventing digital music piracy: The carrot or the stick? J. Marketing (2008) 72(1):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V., Basu A. K. The metric quality of ordered categorical data. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(3):205–230Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh R., Chatterjee R. Bundling, unbundling and pricing of hybrid products: The case of magazine content. J. Interactive Marketing (2006) 20(2):21–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh R., Kamakura W. Optimal bundling and pricing under a monopoly: Contrasting complements and substitutes from independently valued products. J. Bus. (2003) 76(2):211–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh R., Mahajan V. A probabilistic approach to pricing a bundle of products or services. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(4):494–508Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J., Krishnamurthi L. Customizing promotions on online stores. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):561–578Link, Google Scholar