The Sound of Silence: Observational Learning in the U.S. Kidney Market

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0500

References

  • Anderson E. T., Simester D. I. Price discrimination as an adverse signal: Why an offer to spread payments may hurt demand. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(3):315–327LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson L. R., Holt C. A. Information cascades in the laboratory. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(5):847–862Google Scholar
  • Banerjee A. V. A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(3):797–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass F. M. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(5):215–227LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural changes as information cascades. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(5):992–1026CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom. Perspectives (1998) 12(3):151–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C., Ho T.-H. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica (1999) 67(4):827–874CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Çelen B., Kariv S. Distinguishing informational cascades from herd behavior in the laboratory. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 94(3):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., Wang Q., Xie J. Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. (2009) . Working paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1501843Google Scholar
  • Chintagunta P. K., Erdem T., Rossi P. E., Wedel M. Structural modeling in marketing: Review and assessment. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):604–616LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S., Katz E., Menzel H.Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study (1966) (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis) Google Scholar
  • Coscelli A., Shum M. An empirical model of learning and patient spillovers in new drug entry. J. Econometrics (2004) 122(2):213–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeGroot M. H.Optimal Statistical Decisions (1970) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Desai P. S. Multiple messages to retain retailers: Signaling new product demand. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):381–389LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ellison G., Fudenberg D. Word-of-mouth communication and social learning. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110(1):93–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T., Keane M. P. Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):1–20LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D., Mayzlin D. Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Golder P. N., Tellis G. J. Growing, growing, gone: Cascades, diffusion, and turning points in the product life cycle. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):207–218LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guo L., Zhao Y. Voluntary quality disclosure and market interaction. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(3):488–501LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hitsch G. J. An empirical model of optimal dynamic product launch and exit under demand uncertainty. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):25–50LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Horsky D., Simon L. S. Advertising and the diffusion of new products. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(1):1–17LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuksov D. Brand value in social interaction. Management Sci. (2007) 53(10):1634–1644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lago J. Lampe the latest to vow to prove 'em wrong. ESPN.com (2003) June 26). http://sports.espn.go.com/nbadraft/d03/story?id=1573370Google Scholar
  • Manchanda P., Xie Y., Youn N. The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(6):961–976LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Manski C. F. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):531–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D. Promotional chat on the Internet. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(2):155–163LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy S., Srinivasan K. Signaling quality with a money-back guarantee: The role of transaction costs. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(4):442–466LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nair H., Chintagunta P., Dubé J.-P. Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(1):23–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narasimhan C. Incorporating consumer price expectations in diffusion models. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(4):343–357LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan S., Chintagunta P. K., Miravete E. J. The role of self selection, usage uncertainty and learning in the demand for local telephone service. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(1):1–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson P. Information and consumer behaviour. J. Political Econom. (1970) 94:796–821Google Scholar
  • OPTN/SRTR Annual report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1996–2005. (2006) . Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Roth A. E., Sönmez T., Ünver M. U. Kidney exchange. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(2):457–488CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rust J. Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica (1987) 55(5):999–1033CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Su X., Zenios S. A. Patient choice in kidney allocation: The role of the queueing discipline. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2004) 6(4):280–301LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Su X., Zenios S. A., Chertow G. M. Incorporating recipient choice in kidney transplantation. J. Amer. Soc. Nephrology (2004) 15(6):1656–1663CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun B., Xie J., Cao H. H. Product strategy for innovators in markets with network effects. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):243–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Talukdar D., Sudhir K., Ainslie A. Investigating new product diffusion across products and countries. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(1):97–114LinkGoogle Scholar
  • United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Annual report of the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network: Transplant Data 1992–2001. (2002) . Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Renal Data System (USRDS)Annual data report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States (2001) (National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD) Google Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C., Lilien G. L. Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106(5):1409–1435CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Villas-Boas J. M. Consumer learning, brand loyalty, and competition. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):134–145LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Villas-Boas J. M. Dynamic competition with experience goods. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2006) 15(1):37–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Villas-Boas J. M., Winer R. S. Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1324–1338LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vranica S. That guy showing off his hot new phone may be a shill: New campaign for Sony Ericsson puts actors in real-life settings; women play Battleship at the bar. Wall Street Journal (2002) July 31):B1Google Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B. A rational reconstruction of the compromise effect: Using market data to infer utilities. J. Consumer Res. (1995) 21(4):627–633CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang S., Allenby G. M. Modeling interdependent consumer preferences. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(August):282–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.