Rejoinder—Temporal Stochastic Inflation in Choice-Based Research

References

• Andrews R. L., Ainslie A., Currim I. S. On the recoverability of choice behaviors with random coefficients choice models in the context of limited data and unobserved effects. Management Sci. (2008) 54(1):83–99Link, Google Scholar
• Feit E. M. Product category expertise and logit error scale. (2009) . Working paper, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
• Fiebig D. G., Keane M. P., Louviere J. J., Wasi N. The generalized multinomial logit model: Accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Marketing Sci. (2009) . ePub ahead of print July 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0508Google Scholar
• Frederick S., Loewenstein G., O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature (2002) 40(2):351–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchinson J. W., Zauberman G., Meyer R. On the interpretation of temporal inflation parameters in stochastic models of judgment and choice. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(1):23–31Link, Google Scholar
• Kanetkar V., Islam T. Latent segments or scale variations: A simple choice model to incorporate heterogeneity. (2009) . Working paper, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Keane M. P. Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. (1997) 15(3):310–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J. G., Menzefricke U., Feinberg F. M. Modeling parametric evolution in a random utility framework. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2005) 23(3):282–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lachaab M., Ansari A., Jedidi K., Trabelsi A. Modeling preference evolution in discrete choice models: A Bayesian state-space approach. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2006) 4(1):57–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenk P., Bacon L. Estimating common utility origins and scales in discrete-choice conjoint with auxiliary data. (2008) . Working paper, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
• Lenk P., Wedel M., Bockenholt U. Bayesian estimation of circumplex models subject to prior theory constraints and scale-usage bias. Psychometrika (2006) 71(1):33–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N., Trope Y., Loewenstein G., Read D., Baumeister R. F. Construal level theory of intertemporal judgment and decision. Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice (2003) (Sage, New York) 245–276Google Scholar
• Liberman N., Trope Y., Stephan E., Kruglanski A. W., Higgins E. T. Psychological distance. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (2007) (Guilford Press, New York) 353–381Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J. What if consumer experiments impact variances as well as means? Response variability as a behavioral phenomenon. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(3):506–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere J., Swait J. Discussion of “Alleviating the constant stochastic variance assumption in decision research: Theory, measurement, and experimental test”. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(1):18–22Link, Google Scholar
• Malkoc S. A., Zauberman G., Ulu C. Consuming now or later? The interactive effect of timing and attribute alignability. Psychol. Sci (2005) 16(5):411–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marley A. A. J., Louviere J. J. Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best-worst choices. J. Math. Psych. (2005) 49(6):464–480Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics (1974) (Academic Press, New York) 105–142Google Scholar
• Read D., Koehler D. J., Harvey N. Intertemporal choice. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (2004) (Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) 424–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D., Loewenstein G. Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. (1995) 1(1):34–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi P. E., Gilula Z., Allenby G. M. Overcoming scale usage heterogeneity: A Bayesian hierarchical approach. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2001) 96(March):20–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salisbury L. C., Feinberg F. M. Alleviating the constant stochastic variance assumption in decision research: Theory, measurement, and experimental test. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(1):1–17Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res (1980) 7(2):99–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I. The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(2):150–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soman D., Ainslie G., Frederick S., Li X., Lynch J., Moreau P., Mitchell A., et al. The psychology of intertemporal discounting: Why are distant events valued differently from proximal ones? Marketing Lett. (2005) 16(3/4):347–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnier G., Ainslie A., Otter T. Heterogeneity distributions of willingness-to-pay in choice models. Quant. Marketing Ecom. (2007) 5(3):313–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait J., Louviere J. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(3):305–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y., Liberman N. Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. (2000) 79(6):876–889Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y., Liberman N. Temporal construal. Psychol. Rev. (2003) 110(3):403–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y., Liberman N., Wakslak C. Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. J. Consumer Psychol (2007) 17(2):83–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoon C., Feinberg F. M., Hu P., Gutchess A. H., Hedden T., Chen H. Y., Jing Q., Cui Y., Park D. C. Category norms as a function of culture and age: Comparisons of item responses to 105 categories by American and Chinese adults. Psych. Aging (2004) 19(3):379–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao M., Hoeffler S., Zauberman G. Mental simulation and preference consistency over time: The role of process- versus outcome-focused thoughts. J. Marketing Res (2007) 44(3):379–388Crossref, Google Scholar