Database Submission—The Evolving Social Network of Marketing Scholars

References

• Barabási A.-L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1999) 286(5439):509–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barabási A.-L., Jeong H., Ravasz E., Neda Z., Schuberts A., Vicsek T. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A (2002) 311(3):590–614Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollobas B.Random Graphs (1985) (Academic Press, London) Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J., Han S., Lehmann D. R., Hong J. W. The role of hubs in the adoption processes. J. Marketing (2009) 73(2):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goyal S., van der Leij M. J., Moraga-González J. L. Economics: An emerging small world. J. Political Econom. (2006) 114(2):403–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinstein A., Ofek E., Rosenzweig S. Challenging conditions, social networks, and the performance of academic research in marketing. J. Marketing Res. (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Grossman J. W., Ion P. D. F. On a portion of the well-known collaboration graph. Congressus Numerantium (1995) 108:129–131Google Scholar
• Maciejovsky B., Budescu D. V., Ariely D. The researcher as a consumer of scientific publications: How do name-ordering conventions affect inferences about contribution credits? Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(3):589–598Link, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K. The Matthew effect in science. Science (1968) 159(3810):56–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monge P. R., Contractor N. S.Theories of Communication Networks (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moody J. The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2004) 69(2):213–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman M. E. J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA (2001) 98(2):404–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman M. E. J. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. (2003) 45(2):167–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman M. E. J. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA (2004) 101(Supplement 1):5200–5205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R., Baumgartner H. Who talks to whom? Intra- and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. J. Econom. Literature (2002) 40(2):483–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R., Baumgartner H., Vermunt J., Bijmolt T. H. A. Importance and similarity in the evolving citation network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1999) 16(2):113–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawyer A. G., Laran J., Xu J. The readability of marketing journals: Are award-winning articles better written? J. Marketing (2008) 72(1):108–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seggie S. H., Griffith D. A. What does it take to get promoted in marketing academia? Understanding exceptional publication productivity in the leading marketing journals. J. Marketing (2009) 73(1):122–132Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephen A. T., Toubia O. Explaining the power-law degree distribution in a social commerce network. Soc. Networks (2009) 31(4):262–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stremersch S., Verhoef P. C. Globalization of authorship in the marketing discipline: Does it help or hinder the field? Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):585–594Link, Google Scholar
• Stremersch S., Verniers I., Verhoef P. C. The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. J. Marketing (2007) 71(3):171–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tellis G. J., Chandy R. K., Ackerman D. S. In search of diversity: The record of major marketing journals. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(February):120–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Theoharakis V., Hirst A. Perceptual differences of marketing journals: A worldwide perspective. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(4):389–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C., Wuyts S.Social Networks and Marketing (2007) (Marketing Science Institute, Boston) Google Scholar
• Watts D. J. Networks, dynamics and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105(2):493–527Crossref, Google Scholar