Limited Memory, Categorization, and Competition

References

• Alba J., Hutchinson J. W., Lynch J., Robertson T. S., Kassarjian H. Memory and decision making. Consumer Behavior (1991) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 1–49Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W., Bettman J. R., Payne J. W. Biased but efficient: An investigation of coordination facilitated by asymmetric dominance. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(5):903–921Link, Google Scholar
• Bargh J. A., Srull T. K., Wyer R. S. The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. Social Cognition (1994) 3(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 1–40Google Scholar
• Bargh J. A., Wyer R. S. The automaticity of everyday life. The Automaticity of Everyday Life: Advances in Social Cognition (1997) 10(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 1–61Google Scholar
• Basu K. Consumer cognition and pricing in the nines in oligopolistic markets. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2006) 15(1):125–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baye M. J., Morgan J. Winner-take-all price competition. Econom. Theory (2002) 19(2):271–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Ho T.-H. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica (1999) 67(4):827–874Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Ho T.-H., Chong J.-K. A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(3):861–898Crossref, Google Scholar
• Celsi R. L., Olson J. C. The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 15(2):210–224Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickson P. R., Sawyer A. G. The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. J. Marketing (1990) 54(3):42–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dow J. Search decisions with limited memory. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1991) 58(1):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edgeworth F., Edgeworth F. The pure theory of monopoly. Papers Relating to Political Economy (1925) 1(Burt Franklin, New York) 111–142Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D., Welch I. An economic approach to the psychology of change: Amnesia, inertia, and impulsiveness. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2002) 11(3):379–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer G., Kuksov D. Consumer feelings and equilibrium product quality. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2010) 19(1):137–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer G., Pazgal A. Internet shopping agents: Virtual colocation and competition. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):85–106Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer G., Pazgal A. Procurement bidding with restrictions. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2008) 6(2):177–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalai E. Artificial decisions and strategic complexity in repeated games. Essays in Game Theory (1991) (Academic Press, New York) 131–157Google Scholar
• Kreps D. M., Scheinkman J. A. Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yields Cournot outcomes. Bell J. Econom. (1983) 14(2):326–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna A., Johar G. V. Consumer perceptions of deals: Biasing effects of varying deal prices. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. (1996) 2(3):187–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna A., Currim I. S., Shoemaker R. W. Consumer perceptions of promotional activity. J. Marketing (1991) 55(2):4–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R., Villas-Boas J. M. Price promotions and trade deals with multi-product retailers. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):935–949Link, Google Scholar
• Levitan R., Shubik M. Price duopoly and capacity constraints. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1972) 13(1):111–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim N., Ho T.-H. Designing price contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the number of blocks matter? Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):312–326Link, Google Scholar
• Mehta N., Rajiv S., Srinivasan K. Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):58–84Link, Google Scholar
• Mehta N., Rajiv S., Srinivasan K. Role of forgetting in memory-based choice decisions: A structural model. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(2):107–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monroe K. B., Lee A. Y. Remembering versus knowing: Issues in buyers processing of price information. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1999) 27(2):207–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullainathan S. A memory-based model of bounded rationality. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(3):735–774Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C. Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. (1988) 61(4):427–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ofek E., Yildiz M., Haruvy E. The impact of prior decisions on subsequent valuations in a costly contemplation model. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1217–1233Link, Google Scholar
• Raju J. S., Srinivasan V., Lal R. The effects of brand loyalty on competitive price promotional strategies. Management Sci. (1990) 36(3):276–303Link, Google Scholar
• Rao R. C., Arjunji R. V., Murthi B. P. S. Game theory and empirical generalizations concerning competitive promotions. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):G89–G100Link, Google Scholar
• Rosch E., Rosch E., Lloyd B. B. Principles of categorization. Cognition and Categorization (1978) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 27–48Google Scholar
• Rosch E., Mervis C. B. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psych. (1975) 7(4):573–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R. W. A model in which an increase in the number of sellers leads to a higher price. Econometrica (1980) 48(6):1575–1579Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A. On price recognition and computational complexity in a monopolistic model. J. Political Econom. (1993) 101(3):473–484Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A., Eatwell J., Milgate M., Newman P. Bounded rationality. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (1987) (W. W. Norton & Company, New York) 15–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiegler R. Competition over agents with boundedly rational expectations. Theoret. Econom. (2006) 1(2):207–231Google Scholar
• Varian H. R. A model of sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1980) 70(4):651–659Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M. Models of competitive price promotions: Some empirical evidence from the coffee and saltine crackers markets. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1995) 4(1):85–107Crossref, Google Scholar