Complementarities and the Demand for Home Broadband Internet Services

References

• Aron D. J., Burnstein D. E. Broadband adoption in the United States: An empirical analysis. (2003) . Working paper, LECG, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Carlton D. W., Perloff J. M.Modern Industrial Organization (2004) 4th ed.(Addison Wesley, Indianapolis) Google Scholar
• Chung J., Rao V. R. A general choice model for bundles with multiple-category products: Application to market segmentation and optimal pricing for bundles. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(2):115–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crandall R. W.Competition and Chaos: U.S. Telecommunications since the 1996 Telecom Act (2005) (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Crandall R. W., Sidak J. G., Singer H. J. The empirical case against asymmetric regulation of broadband Internet access. Berkeley Tech. Law J. (2002) 17(3):953–987Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Sun B. Testing for choice dynamics in panel data. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2001) 19(2):142–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission High-speed services for Internet access: Status as of December 31, 2005. (2006) . Report, FCC, Washington, DC. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266596A1.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Fordahl M. Despite demand, competitive DSL industry struggling. Berkeley Daily Planet (2001) April 23). http://www.berkeleydaily.org/issue/2001-04-23/article/4509Google Scholar
• Fox J. T., Gandhi A. Identifying heterogeneity in economic choice and selection models using mixtures. (2009) . Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago; and National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M. Valuing new goods in a model with complementarity: Online newspapers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(3):713–744Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goolsbee G., Petrin A. The consumer gains from direct broadcast satellites and the competition with cable TV. Econometrica (2004) 72(2):351–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadagni P. M., Little J. D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):203–238Link, Google Scholar
• Hausman J., Crandall R., Alleman J. Competition and regulation for Internet-related services: Results of asymmetric regulation. Broadband (2002) (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC) 129–156Google Scholar
• Kalakota R., Gundepudi P., Wareham J., Rai A., Welke R. The economics of DSL regulation. Computer (2002) 35(10):29–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little D., Crockett R. O. Are the Baby Bells playing dirty? BusinessWeek (2001) August 31). http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_33/b3745065.htmGoogle Scholar
• Ma Y., Seetharaman P. B., Narasimhan C. Modeling dependencies in brand choices across complementary categories. (2009) . Working paper, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Manchanda P., Ansari A., Gupta S. The “shopping basket”: A model for multicategory purchase incidence decisions. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(2):95–114Link, Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econom. (2000) 15(5):447–470Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery A. L., Bradlow E. T. Why analyst overconfidence about the functional form of demand models can lead to overpricing. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):569–583Link, Google Scholar
• Park R. E., Wetzel B. M., Mitchell B. M. Price elasticities for local phone calls. Econometrica (1983) 51(6):1699–1730Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A. Quantifying the benefits of new products: The case of the minivan. J. Political Econom. (2002) 110(4):705–729Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reardon M. EarthLink aims to evolve. CNET News (2005) October 11). http://news.cnet.com/EarthLink-aims-to-evolve/2100-1034_3-5892671.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Red Herring DSL providers get cut off. (2001) April 2). http://www.redherring.com/Home/2022Google Scholar
• Russell G. J., Petersen A. Analysis of cross category dependence in market basket selection. J. Retailing (2000) 76(3):367–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman P. B., Ainslie A., Chintagunta P. K. Investigating household state dependence effects across categories. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(4):488–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman P. B., Chib S., Ainslie A., Boatwright P., Chan T., Gupta S., Mehta N., Rao V., Strijnev A. Models of multi-category choice behavior. Marketing Lett. (2005) 16(3–4):239–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen Q., Villas-Boas M. J. Strategic entry in dynamic markets. (2009) . Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Shy O.Industrial Organization: Theory and Applications (1996) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Small K. A., Rosen H. S. Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica (1981) 49(1):105–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song I., Chintagunta P. K. Measuring cross-category price effects with aggregate store data. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1594–1609Link, Google Scholar
• Sriram S., Chintagunta P. K., Agarwal M. K. Investigating consumer purchase behavior in related technology product categories. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(2):291–314Link, Google Scholar
• Train K. E., McFadden D. L., Ben-Akiva M. The demand for local phone service: A fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choices. RAND J. Econom. (1987) 18(1):109–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wedel M., Zhang J. Analyzing brand competition across subcategories. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):448–456Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar