Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales

References

• Ahluwalia R., Burnkrant R. E., Unnava H. R. Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):203–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alba J. W., Hutchinson J. W. Dimensions of consumer expertise. J. Consumer Res. (1987) 13(4):411–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson J. R.Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach (1995) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Arndt J. Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. J. Marketing Res. (1967) 4(3):291–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basuroy S., Chatterjee S., Ravid S. A. How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. J. Marketing (2003) 67(4):103–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Fitzsimons G. M. Dogs on the street, Pumas on your feet: How cues in the environment influence product evaluation and choice. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(1):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Heath C. Idea habitats: How the prevalence of environmental cues influences the success of ideas. Cognitive Sci. (2005) 29(2):195–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Meredith M., Wheeler S. C. Contextual priming: Where people vote affects how they vote. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2008) 105(26):8846–8849Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackshaw P.Satisfied Customers Tell Three Friends, Angry Customers Tell 3,000: Running a Business in Today's Consumer-Driven World (2008) (Broadway Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Bogart D.The Bowker Annual Library and Book Trade Almanac (2001) (R. R. Bowker, New York) Google Scholar
• Burrough B. Sleeping with the fishes. Vanity Fair (2006) December 1):244–256Google Scholar
• Chevalier J. A., Mayzlin D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):345–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemons E. K., Gao G., Hitt L. M. When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 23(2):149–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S., Katz E., Menzel H.Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study (1966) (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis) Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C., Zhang X., Awad N. F. Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. J. Interactive Marketing (2007) 21(4):23–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D., Mayzlin D. Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(4):721–739Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J., Libai B., Moldovan S., Muller E. The NPV of bad news. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2007) 24(3):186–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J., Feldman R., Fresco M., Netzer O., Ungar L. Using text mining to analyze user forums. J. Online Inform. Rev. (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Greene B. Worms? McDonald's isn't laughing. Chicago Tribune (1978) November 20):A1Google Scholar
• Hannah D. B., Sternthal B. Detecting and explaining the sleeper effect. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 11(2):632–642Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser J. R. Testing the accuracy, usefulness, and significance of probabilistic models: An information-theoretic approach. Oper. Res. (1978) 26(3):406–421Link, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K., Sorensen A. Information and the skewness of music sales. J. Political Econom. (2009) 117(2):324–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins E. T., King G., Cantor N., Kihlstrom J. F. Accessibility of social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction (1981) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 60–81Google Scholar
• Huang J.-H., Chen Y.-F. Herding in online product choice. Psych. Marketing (2006) 23(5):413–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R., Van den Bulte C., Valente T. W. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. (2008) . Marketing Science Institute Report 08-120, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• James C. When the bad buzz arrives before the movie does. New York Times (2006) September 26):A1Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y. Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. J. Marketing (2006) 70(3):74–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynch J. R., Srull T. K. Memory and attentional factors in consumer choice: Concepts and research methods. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(1):18–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitra A., Lynch J. G. Toward a reconciliation of market power and information theories of advertising effects on price elasticity. J. Consumer Res. (1995) 21(March):644–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe W. W. How much does a good product rating help a bad product? Modeling the dynamics of online product ratings and their effects on sales. (2009) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
• Moore D. L., Hutchinson J. W., Bagozzi R. P., Tybout A. M. The effects of ad affect on advertising effectiveness. Advances in Consumer Research (1983) 10(Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI) 526–531Google Scholar
• Moore D. L., Hutchinson J. W., Alwitt L. F., Mitchell A. A. The influence of affective reactions to advertising: Direct and indirect mechanisms of attitude change. Psychological Processes and Advertising Effects: Theory, Research, and Application (1985) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 65–90Google Scholar
• Motion Picture Association of America 2006 U.S. theatrical market statistics. (2006) . Retrieved September 1, 2006, http://pds4.egloos.com/pds/200708/28/11/2006-US-Theatrical-Market-Statistics-Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Nedungadi P. recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 17(3):263–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• New York Times Company 2006 annual report. (2006) . Retrieved May 24, 2007, http://www.nytco.com/pdf/annual_2006/2006NYTannual.pdfGoogle Scholar
• O'Connell V. Ripe for change: Wine sales thrive as old barriers start to crumble. Wall Street Journal (2006) August 25):A1Google Scholar
• Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1979) 37(10):1915–1926Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinstein D. A., Snyder C. M. The influence of expert reviews on consumer demand for experience goods: A case study of movie critics. J. Indust. Econom. (2005) 53(1):27–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sela A., Shiv B. Unraveling priming: When does the same prime activate a goal versus a trait? J. Consumer Res. (2009) 36(3):418–433Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I., Carmon Z., O'Curry S. Experimental evidence on the negative effect of product features and sales promotions on brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(1):23–40Link, Google Scholar
• Skurnik I., Yoon C., Park D. C., Schwarz N. How warnings about false claims become recommendations. J. Consumer Res. (2005) 31(4):713–724Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler G. J. The economics of information. J. Political Econom. (1961) 69(3):213–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tybout A. M., Calder B. J., Sternthal B. Using information-processing theory to design marketing strategies. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):73–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C., Lilien G. L. Two-stage partial observability models of innovation adoption. (2001) . Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Yabroff J. Coming of age. Newsweek (2006) December 18):8Google Scholar
• Winer R. S. Experimentation in the 21st century: The importance of external validity. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1999) 27(3):349–358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wittink D. R.Journal of Marketing Research: 2 Ps. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(1):1–6Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wyatt R. O., Badger D. P. How reviews affect interest in and evaluation of films. Journalism Quart. (1984) 61(4):874–878Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wyer R. S., Srull T. K., Higgins E. T., Herman C. P., Zanna M. P. Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium (1981) 1(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 161–197Google Scholar
• Zajonc R. B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Personality Soc. Psych.: Monograph Supplement (1968) 9(2, Part 2):1–27Crossref, Google Scholar