Equilibrium Returns Policies in the Presence of Supplier Competition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0563

References

  • Bazaraa M. S., Sherali H. D., Shetty C. M.Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms (1983) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Butz D. A. Vertical price controls with uncertain demand. J. Law Econom. (1997) 40(2):433–459CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Fisher M. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Sci. (2000) 46(8):1032–1048LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Lariviere M. A. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):30–44LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Zipkin P. H. Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a two-stage supply chain. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):936–953LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Çetinkaya S., Parlar M. Optimal myopic policy for a stochastic inventory problem with fixed and proportional backorder costs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998) 110(1):20–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F. Auctioning supply contracts. Management Sci. (2007) 53(10):1562–1576LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coughlan A. T. Competition and cooperation in marketing channel choice: Theory and application. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):110–129LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coughlan A. T., Wernerfelt B. On credible delegation by oligopolists: A discussion of distribution channel management. Management Sci. (1989) 35(2):226–239LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coughlan A. T., Anderson E., Stern L. W., El-Ansary A.Marketing Channels (2006) 7th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Dana J. D., Spier K. E. Revenue sharing and vertical control in the video rental industry. J. Indust. Econom. (2001) 49(3):223–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta P., Maskin E. The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games, I: Theory. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1986) 53(1):1–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deneckere R., Marvel H. P., Peck J. Demand uncertainty and price maintenance: Markdowns as destructive competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(4):619–641Google Scholar
  • Gal-Or E. Vertical restraints with incomplete information. J. Indust. Econom. (1991) 39(5):503–516CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gal-Or E. Vertical integration in oligopoly. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1992) 8(2):377–393Google Scholar
  • Granot D., Yin S. On the effectiveness of returns policies in the price-dependent newsvendor model. Naval Res. Logist. (2005) 52(8):765–779CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grocery Manufacturers Association Powering growth through direct store delivery. (2008) . Report version 1.1 (September), http://www.gmabrands.com/publications/DSD_Final_111108.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D. An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. J. Marketing (2003) 67(3):96–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland A. P., Shugan S. M. Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):239–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland A. P., Shugan S. M. Reply to: “Managing channel profits: Comment”. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(1):103–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kandel E. The right to return. J. Law Econom. (1996) 39(1):329–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuik R., van Nunen J. A. E. E., Coenen J., Flapper S. D. P., van Nunen J. A. E. E., Van Wassenhove L. N. Commercial returns of sun-protection products: The L'Oréal France case. Managing Closed-Loop Supply Chains (2005) (Springer, Berlin) 79–86Part 4CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R., Staelin R. An approach for developing an optimal discount pricing policy. Management Sci. (1984) 30(12):1524–1539LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M. A., Porteus E. L. Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contract. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2001) 3(4):293–305LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lau A. H. L., Lau H.-S., Wang J.-C. How a dominant retailer might design a purchase contract for a newsvendor-type product with price-sensitive demand. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 190(2):443–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mantrala M. K., Raman K. Demand uncertainty and supplier's returns policies for a multi-store style-good retailer. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1999) 115(2):270–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marvel H. P., Peck J. Demand uncertainty and returns policies. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1995) 36(3):691–714CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire T. W., Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(2):161–191LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire T. W., Staelin R., Bucklin L. P., Carmen J. M. Channel efficiency, incentive compatibility, transfer pricing and market structure. Research in Marketing: Distribution Channels and Institutions (1986) 8(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 181–223Google Scholar
  • Monahan J. P. A quantity discount pricing model to increase vendor profits. Management Sci. (1984) 30(6):720–726LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy K. S. Managing channel profits: Comment. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(4):375–379LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy K. S. Strategic decentralization in channels. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(4):335–355LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Padmanabhan V., Png I. P. L. Manufacturer's return policies and retail competition. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(1):81–94LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Padmanabhan V., Png I. P. L. Reply to “Do returns policies intensify retail competition?”. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):614–618LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pasternack B. A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):166–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pasternack B. A. Commentary—Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (2008a) 27(1):131–132LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pasternack B. A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (2008b) 27(1):133–140LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Paul A. On the unimodality of the manufacturer's objective function in the newsvendor model. Oper. Res. Lett. (2006) 34(1):46–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pellegrini L., Pellegrini L., Reddy S. K. Sale or return agreements vs outright sales. Marketing Channels: Relationships and Performance (1986) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) 59–72Google Scholar
  • Rey P., Tirole J. The logic of vertical restraints. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):921–939Google Scholar
  • Sarvary M., Padmanabhan V. The informational role of manufacturer returns policies: How they can help in learning the demand. Marketing Lett. (2001) 12(4):341–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scherer F. M., Ross D.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (1980) (Houghton-Miffin, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Shugan S. M. Implicit understandings in channels of distribution. Management Sci. (1985) 31(4):435–460LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan S. M. Editorial—Introduction to the special classics issue. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(1):9–11LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon L. K. Games with discontinuous payoffs. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1987) 54(4):569–597CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor T. A., Xiao W. Incentives for retailer forecasting: Rebates vs. returns. Management Sci. (2009) 55(10):1654–1669LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsay A. A. Managing retail channel overstock: Markdown money and return policies. J. Retailing (2001) 77(4):457–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang H. Do returns policies intensify retail competition? Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):611–613LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weng Z. K. Channel coordination and quantity discounts. Management Sci. (1995) 41(9):1509–1522LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weng Z. K., Wong R. T. General models for the supplier's all-unit quantity discount policy. Naval Res. Logist. (1993) 40(7):971–991CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1983) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1998) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.