Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0566

References

  • Becker M. H. Sociometric location and innovativeness: Reformulation and extension of the diffusion model. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1970) 35(2):267–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell D. R., Song S. Neighborhood effects and trial on the Internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(4):361–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Heath C. Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34(2):121–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(6):1287–1335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Childers T. L. Assessment of the psychometric properties of an opinion leadership scale. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23(2):184–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S., Katz E., Menzel H.Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study (1966) (Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis) Google Scholar
  • Costenbader E., Valente T. W. The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Soc. Networks (2003) 25(4):282–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coulter R. A., Feick L. F., Price L. L. Changing faces: Cosmetics opinion leadership among women in the new Hungary. Eur. J. Marketing (2002) 36(11/12):1287–1308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dolton P. J., van der Klaauw W. Leaving teaching in the UK: A duration analysis. Econom. J. (1995) 105(429):431–444Google Scholar
  • Dorfman S., Maynor J. Marketing to professionals: Under the influence. Pharm. Executive (2006) 26(March):148–150Google Scholar
  • Doumit G., Gattellari M., Grimshaw J., O'Brien M. A. Local opinion leaders: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2007) 1:CD000125Google Scholar
  • Duflo E., Saez E. The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(3):815–842CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn L. R., Goldsmith R. E., Eastman J. K. The King and Summers opinion leadership scale: Revision and refinement. J. Bus. Res. (1994) 31(1):55–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D., Mayzlin D. Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(4):721–739LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldenberg J., Han S., Lehmann D. R., Hong J. W. The role of hubs in the adoption process. J. Marketing (2009) 73(2):1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldenberg J., Lehmann D. R., Shidlovski D., Barak M. M. The role of expert versus social opinion leaders in new product adoption. (2006) . Report 06–124, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Grinblatt M., Keloharju M., Ikäheimo S. Social influence and consumption: Evidence from the automobile purchases of neighbors. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2008) 90(4):735–753CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hahn M., Park S., Krishnamurthi L., Zoltners A. A. Analysis of new product diffusion using a four-segment trial-repeat model. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(3):224–247LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hartmann W. R. Demand estimation with social interactions and the implications for targeted marketing. (2009) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R., Miner A. S. Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(3):472–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill S., Provost F., Volinsky C. Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Stat. Sci. (2006) 21(2):256–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacoby J. The construct validity of opinion leadership. Public Opinion Quart. (1974) 38(1):81–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keating N. L., Ayanian J. Z., Cleary P. D., Marsden P. V. Factors affecting influential discussions among physicians: A social network analysis of a primary care practice. J. Gen. Intern. Med. (2007) 22(6):794–798CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim P.-J., Jeong H. Reliability of rank order in sampled networks. Eur. Phys. J. Ser. B (2007) 55:109–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kratzer J., Lettl C. Distinctive roles of lead users and opinion leaders in the social networks of schoolchildren. J. Consumer Res. (2009) 36(4):646–659CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuo D., Gifford D. R., Stein M. D. Curbside consultation practices and attitudes among primary care physicians and medical subspecialists. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. (1998) 280(10):905–909CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laumann E. O., Marsden P. V., Prensky D., Freeman L. C., White D. R., Romney A. K. The boundary specification problem in network analysis. Research Methods in Social Network Analysis (1989) (George Mason University Press, Fairfax, VA) 61–87Google Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D. Experts as negative opinion leaders in the diffusion of a technological innovation. J. Consumer Res. (1985) 11(4):914–926CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leskovec J., Faloutsos C. Sampling from large graphs. Proc. 12th ACM SIGKKD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (2006) Philadelphia(ACM, New York) 631–636CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin N., Burt R. S. Differential effects of information channels in the process of innovation diffusion. Soc. Forces (1975) 54(1):256–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locock L., Dopson S., Chambers D., Gabbay J. Understanding the role of opinion leaders in improving clinical effectiveness. Soc. Sci. Med. (2001) 53(6):745–757CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P., Xie Y., Youn N. The role of targeted communication and contagion in new product adoption. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(6):961–976LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P. V., Podolny J., Weesie J., Flap H. Dynamic analysis of network diffusion processes. Social Networks Through Time (1990) (ISOR/Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands) 197–214Google Scholar
  • McCarty C., Killworth P. D., Rennell J. Impact of methods for reducing respondent burden on personal network structural measures. Soc. Networks (2007) 29(2):300–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meng X.-L., Rosenthal R., Rubin D. B. Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psych. Bull. (1992) 111(1):172–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer B. D. Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells. Econometrica (1990) 58(4):757–782CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nair H., Manchanda P., Bhatia T. Asymmetric social interactions in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. (2006) . Research Paper 1970, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Ord K. Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. (1975) 70(349):120–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raftery A. E. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol. Methodol. (1995) 25(3):111–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (2003) 5th ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rogers E. M., Cartano D. G. Methods of measuring opinion leadership. Public Opinion Quart. (1962) 26(3):435–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. M., Svenning L.Modernization Among Peasants: The Impact of Communication (1969) (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sacerdote B. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(2):681–704CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D., Tuma N. B. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in diffusion. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 99(3):614–639CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor J. W. A striking characteristic of innovators. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14:104–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson C. Is the tipping point toast? Fast Company (2008) 122(February):74–105Google Scholar
  • Tucker C. Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. (2008) 54(12):2024–2038LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Valente T. W.Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations (1995) (Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Valente T. W., Pumpuang P. Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Educ. Behav. (2007) 34(6):881–896CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Valente T. W., Hoffman B. R., Ritt-Olson A., Lichtman K., Johnson C. A. Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. Amer. J. Public Health (2003) 93(11):1837–1843CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C., Joshi Y. V. New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):400–421LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C., Lilien G. L. Bias and systematic change in the parameter estimates of macro-level diffusion models. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(4):338–353LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C., Lilien G. L. Medical Innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106(5):1409–1435CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C., Stremersch S. Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):530–544LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C., Wuyts S.Social Networks and Marketing (2007) (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Dodds P. S. Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34(4):441–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Peretti J. Viral marketing for the real world. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2007) 85(May):22–23Google Scholar
  • Weimann G.The Influentials: People Who Influence People (1994) (State University of New York Press, Albany) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.