Moment-to-Moment Optimal Branding in TV Commercials: Preventing Avoidance by Pulsing

References

• Aaker D. A., Bruzzone D. E. Causes of irritation in advertising. J. Marketing (1985) 49(2):47–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aitchinson J.Cutting Edge Advertising: How to Create the World's Best Print for Brands in the 2lst Century (1999) (Prentice Hall, New York) Google Scholar
• Albert J. H., Chib S. Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1993) 88(422):669–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnheim R.The Power of the Center: A Study of Composition in the Visual Arts (1988) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
• Baker W. E., Honea H., Russell C. A. Do not wait to reveal the brand name: The effect of brand-name placement on television advertising effectiveness. J. Advertising (2004) 33(3):77–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass F. M., Bruce N., Majumdar S., Murthi B. P. S. Wearout effects of different advertising themes: A dynamic Bayesian model of the advertising-sales relationship. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):179–195Link, Google Scholar
• Berlyne D. E.Aesthetics and Psychobiology (1971) (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York) Google Scholar
• Billio M., Casarin R., Sartore D., Mazzi G. L., Savio G. Bayesian inference on dynamic models with latent factors. Growth and Cycle in the Eurozone (2007) (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) 25–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolls P. D., Muehling D. D., Yoon K. The effect of television commercial pacing on viewers' attention and memory. J. Marketing Comm. (2003) 9(1):17–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Book A. C., Schick C. D.Fundamentals of Copy and Layout (1997) (NTC/Contemporary Publishing Group, Lincolnwood, IL) Google Scholar
• Brown S. C., Craik F. I. M., Tulving E., Craik F. I. M. Encoding and retrieval of information. The Oxford Handbook of Memory (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 93–107Google Scholar
• Bryce W. J., Yalch R. F. Hearing versus seeing: A comparison of learning of spoken and pictorial information in television advertising. J. Current Issues Res. Advertising (1993) 15(1):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns J. J., Anderson D. R. Attentional inertia and recognition memory in adult television viewing. Comm. Res. (1993) 20(6):777–799Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calvo M. G., Lang P. J. Gaze patterns when looking at emotional pictures: Motivationally biased attention. Motivation Emotion (2004) 28(3):221–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter C. K., Kohn R. On Gibbs sampling for state space models. Biometrika (1994) 81(3):541–553Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chib S. Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90(432):1313–1321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin J. J. In-home observations of commercial avoidance behavior. J. Current Issues Res. Advertising (1995) 17(2):69–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donderi D. C. Visual complexity: A review. Psych. Bull. (2006) 132(1):73–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duchowski A. T.Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice (2003) (Springer-Verlag, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• d'Ydewalle G., Desmet G., Van Rensbergen J., Underwood G. Film perception: The processing of film cuts. Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception (1998) (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam) 357–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fazio R. H., Herr P. M., Powell M. C. On the development and strength of category–brand associations in memory: The case of mystery ads. J. Consumer Psych. (1992) 1(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feichtinger G., Hartl R. F., Sethi S. P. Dynamic optimal control models in advertising: Recent developments. Management Sci. (1994) 40(2):195–226Link, Google Scholar
• Feinberg F. M. On continuous-time optimal advertising under S-shaped response. Management Sci. (2001) 47(11):1476–1487Link, Google Scholar
• Frühwirth-Schnatter S. Data augmentation and dynamic linear models. J. Time Ser. Anal. (1994) 15(2):183–202Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gamerman D. Markov chain Monte Carlo for dynamic generalized linear models. Biometrika (1998) 85(1):215–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Germeys F., d'Ydewalle G. The psychology of film: Perceiving beyond the cut. Psych. Res. (2007) 71(4):458–466Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelfand A. E., Hills S. E., Racine-Poon A., Smith A. F. M. Illustration of Bayesian inference in normal data models using Gibbs sampling. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1990) 85(412):972–985Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greyser S. A. Irritation in advertising. J. Advertising Res. (1973) 13(1):3–10Google Scholar
• Grover R., Fine J. The sound of many hands zapping. BusinessWeek (2006) May 22). http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_21/b3985063.htmGoogle Scholar
• Gustafson P., Siddarth S. Describing the dynamics of attention to TV commercials: A hierarchical Bayes analysis of the time to zap an ad. J. Appl. Statist. (2007) 34(5):585–609Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn M., Hyun J.–S. Advertising cost interactions and the optimality of pulsing. Management Sci. (1991) 37(2):157–169Link, Google Scholar
• Heeter C., Greenberg B. S. Profiling the zappers. J. Advertising Res. (1985) 25(2):15–19Google Scholar
• Janiszewski C. The influence of display characteristics on visual exploratory search behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(3):290–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krugman D. M., Cameron G. T., White C. M. Visual attention to programming and commercials: The use of in-home observations. J. Advertising (1995) 24(1):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kutner M. H., Nachtsheim C. J., Neter J.Applied Linear Regression Models (2004) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Lachaab M., Ansari A., Jedidi K., Trabelsi A. Modeling preference evolution in discrete choice models: A Bayesian state-space approach. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2006) 4(1):57–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lang A. The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. J. Comm. (2000) 50(1):46–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lang A., Zhou S., Schwartz N., Bolls P. D., Potter R. F. The effects of edits on arousal, attention, and memory for television messages: When an edit is an edit can an edit be too much? J. Broadcasting Electron. Media (2000) 44(1):94–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lang A., Shin M., Bradley S. D., Wang Z., Lee S., Potter D. Wait! Don't turn that dial! More excitement to come! The effects of story length and production pacing in local television news on channel changing behavior and information processing in a free choice environment. J. Broadcasting Electron. Media (2005) 49(1):3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin A. D., Quinn K. M. Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Anal. (2002) 10(2):134–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mihaylova M., Stomonyakov V., Vassilev A. Peripheral and central delay in processing high spatial frequencies: Reaction time and VEP latency studies. Vision Res. (1999) 39(4):699–705Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naik P. A., Mantrala M. K., Sawyer A. G. Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):214–235Link, Google Scholar
• Palmer S. E.Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology (1999) (A Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Pavelchak M. A., Gardner M. P., Broach V. C. Effect of ad pacing and optimal level of arousal on attitude toward the ad. Adv. Consumer Res. (1991) 18:94–99Google Scholar
• Perse E. M. Implications of cognitive and affective involvement for channel changing. J. Comm. (1998) 48(3):49–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R., Wedel M. Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial, and text-size effects. J. Marketing (2004) 68(2):36–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R., Wedel M. Goal control of attention to advertising: The Yarbus implication. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34(2):224–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R., Wedel M., Zhang J. Optimal feature advertising design under competitive clutter. Management Sci. (2007) 53(11):1815–1828Link, Google Scholar
• Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psych. Bull. (1998) 124(3):372–422Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M. Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):304–328Link, Google Scholar
• Sekhon J., Mebane W. Genetic optimization using derivatives: Theory and applications to nonlinear models. Political Anal. (1998) 7(1):187–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siddarth S., Chattopadhyay A. To zap or not to zap: A study of the determinants of channel switching during commercials. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):124–138Link, Google Scholar
• Sprott J. C., Bolliger J., Mladenoff D. J. Self-organized criticality in forest-landscape evolution. Phys. Lett. A (2002) 297(3–4):267–271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinberg B., Hampp A. DVR ad skipping happens, but not always. Advertising Age (2007) May 31). http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=117023Google Scholar
• Stewart D. W., Furse D. H.Effective Television Advertising (1986) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
• Stewart D. W., Koslow S. Executional factors and advertising effectiveness. J. Advertising (1989) 18(3):21–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sueyoshi G. T. A class of binary response models for grouped duration data. J. Appl. Econometrics (1995) 10(4):411–431Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tse A. C. B., Lee R. P. W. Zapping behavior during commercial breaks. J. Advertising Res. (2001) 41(3):25–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wedel M., Pieters R. Eye fixations on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):297–312Link, Google Scholar
• Wedel M., Pieters R. A review of eye-tracking research in marketing. Rev. Marketing Res. (2008) 4:123–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• West M., Harrison J.Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Linear Models (1997) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
• Wilbur K. C. How the digital video recorder changes traditional television advertising. J. Advertising (2008) 37(1):143–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woltman Elpers J. L. C. M., Wedel M., Pieters F. G. M. Why do consumers stop watching TV commercials?: Two experiments on the influence of moment-to-moment entertainment and information value. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(4):437–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley S. Zap! Forbes (2003) September). http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2003/0929/076.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Yarbus A. L.Eye Movements and Vision (1967) (Plenum, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yerkes R. M., Dodson J. D. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J. Comparative Neurology Psych. (1908) 18(5):459–482Crossref, Google Scholar