The Design of Durable Goods

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0592

References

  • Auernheimer L., Saving T. R. Market organization and the durability of durable goods. Econometrica (1977) 45(1):219–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barro R. J. Monopoly and contrived depreciation. J. Political Econom. (1972) 80(3):598–602CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass F. M. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(5):215–227LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Belloni A., Freund R., Selove M., Simester D. Optimizing product line designs: Efficient methods and comparisons. Management Sci. (2008) 54(9):1544–1552LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P., Purohit D. Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11, Part 2):s19–s34LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P. S., Purohit D. Competition in durable goods markets: The strategic consequences of leasing and selling. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(1):42–58LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P. S., Koenigsberg O., Purohit D. The role of production lead time and demand uncertainty in marketing durable goods. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):150–158LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Green P. E., Krieger A. M. Models and heuristics for product line selection. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kleiman E., Ophir T. The durability of durable goods. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1966) 33(2):165–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R., Krishnamurti R. A heuristic approach to product design. Management Sci. (1987) 33(12):1523–1533LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levhari D., Srinivasan T. N. Durability of consumption goods: Competition versus monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1969) 59(1):102–107Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., Purohit D. Durable goods and product obsolescence. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(1):35–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan V., Muller E., Bass F. M. New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. J. Marketing (1990) 54(1):1–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy K. S., Png I. P. L. Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):345–359LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Muller E., Peles Y. C. The dynamic adjustment of optimal durability and quality. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1988) 6(4):499–507CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muller E., Peles Y. C. Optimal dynamic durability. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (1990) 14(3–4):709–719CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sankaranarayanan R. Innovation and the durable goods monopolist: The optimality of frequent new-version releases. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(6):774–791LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R. Regulation and the durability of goods. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. (1970) 1(1):54–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R. Market structure, durability, and maintenance effort. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1974) 41(2):277–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R. Market structure, durability and quality: A selective survey. Econom. Inquiry (1979) 17(2):177–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sieper E., Swan P. L. Monopoly and competition in the market for durable goods. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1973) 40(3):333–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Su T. T. Durability of consumption goods reconsidered. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1975) 65(1):148–157Google Scholar
  • Swan P. L. Durability of consumption goods. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1970) 60(5):884–894Google Scholar
  • Swan P. L. Product durability under monopoly and competition: Comment. Econometrica (1977) 45(1):229–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thölke J. M., Hultink E. J., Robben H. S. J. Launching new product features: A multiple case examination. J. Product Innovation Management (2001) 18(1):3–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.