Commentary—Identifying Social Influence: A Comment on Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion

References

• Aral S., Van Alstyne M. Networks, information and brokerage—The diveristy-bandwidth tradeoff. (2009) . Working paper, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York. http://ssrn.com/abstract=958158Google Scholar
• Aral S., Walker D. Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. (2010) . Working paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1564856Google Scholar
• Aral S., Muchnik L., Sundararajan A. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2009) 106(51):21544–21549Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bemmaor A. C., Laurent G., Lilien G. L., Pras B. Modeling the diffusion of new durable goods: Word-of-mouth effect versus consumer heterogeneity. Research Traditions in Marketing (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) 201–223Google Scholar
• Berger J., Milkman K. Social transmission and viral culture. (2009) . Working paper, The Wharton School of the Univeristy of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Biyalogorsky E., Gerstner E., Libai B. Customer referral management: Optimal reward programs. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(1):82–95Link, Google Scholar
• Bramoullé Y., Djebbari H., Fortin B. Identification of peer effects through social networks. J. Econometrics (2009) 150(1):41–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(6):1287–1335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christakis N. A., Fowler J. H. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New Engl. J. Med. (2007) 357(4):370–379Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crandall D., Cosley D., Huttenlocher D., Kleinberg J., Suri S. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data (2008) Las Vegas, NV(ACM, New York) 160–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Currarini S., Jackson M. O., Paolo P. An economic model of friendship: Homophily, minorities, and segregation. Econometrica (2009) 77(4):1003–1045Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodds P. S., Watts D. J. Universal behavior in a generalized model of contagion. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2004) 92(21):218701-1–218701-4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N., Himmelberg C., Brock G., Solomons M. D. Critical mass and network evolution in telecommunications. Toward a Competitive Telecommunications Industry: Selected Papers from the 1994 Telecommunications Policy Research Conference (1995) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 47–66Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):940–955Google Scholar
• Ghose A., Han S.-P. An empirical analysis of user content generation and usage behavior in mobile media. (2010) . Working paper, Stern School of Business, University of New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Gladwell M.The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference (2000) (Little, Brown and Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Godes D., Mayzlin D. Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J., Libai B., Muller E. Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Lett. (2001) 12(3):211–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J., Libai B., Muller E. The chilling effects of network externalities. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2010) 27(1):4–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J., Han S., Lehmann D. R., Hong J. W. The role of hubs in the adoption process. J. Marketing (2009) 73(2):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Threshold models of collective behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. (1978) 83(6):1420–1443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C., Bell C., Sternberg E. Emotional selection in memes: The case of urban legends. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81(6):1028–1041Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill S., Provost F., Volinsky C. Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Statistical Sci. (2006) 21(2):256–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iribarren J. L., Moro E. Impact of human activity patterns on the dynamics of information diffusion. Physical Rev. Lett. (2009) 103(3):038702-1–038702-4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R., Van den Bulte C., Valente T. W. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):195–212Link, Google Scholar
• Katz E. The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quart. (1957) 21(1):61–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz E., Lazarsfeld P. F.Personal Influence (1955) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Kempe D., Kleinberg J., Tardos E. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proc. 9th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (2003) Washington, DC(ACM, New York) 137–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Libai B., Biyalogorsky E., Gerstner E. Setting referral fees in affiliate marketing. J. Service Res. (2003) 5(4):303–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski C. F. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):531–542Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K., Merton R. K. Patterns of influence: Local and cosmopolitan influentials. Social Theory Social Structure (1968) (Free Press, New York) 441–474Google Scholar
• Moore C., Newman M. E. Epidemics and percolation in small-world networks. Physics Rev. E (2000) 61(5, Part B):5678–5682Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer G., Sundararajan A. The visible hand of peer networks in electronic markets. (2010) . Working paper, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1268516Google Scholar
• Peres R., Mahajan V., Muller E. Innovation diffusion and new product growth: A critical review and research directions. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2010) 27(2):91–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reingen P. H., Foster B. L., Brown J. J., Seidman S. B. Brand congruence in interpersonal relations: A social network analysis. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 11(3):771–783Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (2003) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ryu G., Feick L. A penny for your thoughts: Referral reward programs and referral likelihood. J. Marketing (2007) 71(1):84–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(2):681–704Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C., Varian H.Information Rules (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Snijders T., Steglich C., Schweinberger M., van Montfort K., Oud H., Satorra A. Modeling the coevolution of networks and behavior. Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences (2006) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 41–72Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A. Local network effects and complex network structure. B.E.J. Theoretical Econom. (2007) 7(1):1–35Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A., Provost F., Oestreicher-Singer G., Aral S. Information in digital, economic and social networks. (2010) . Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Tucker C. Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. (2008) 54(12):2024–2038Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C., Lilien G. L. Medical Innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106(5):1409–1435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J., Dodds P. S. Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34(4):441–458Crossref, Google Scholar