Search and Choice in Online Consumer Auctions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0601

References

  • Anwar S., McMillan R., Zheng M. Bidding behavior in competing auctions: Evidence from eBay. Eur. Econom. Rev. (2006) 50(2):307–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D., Simonson I. Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. J. Consumer Psych. (2003) 13(1–2):113–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos J. Y. Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1676–1692LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhat C. R. Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model. Transportation Res. Part B (2001) 35(7):677–693CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradlow E. T., Park Y.-H. Bayesian estimation of bid sequences in Internet auctions using a generalized record-breaking model. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):218–229LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin R. E., Gupta S. Brand choice, purchase incidence, and segmentation: An integrated modeling approach. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(2):201–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin R. E., Lattin J. M. A two-state model of purchase incidence and brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(1):24–39LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chan T. Y., Kadiyali V., Park Y.-H. Willingness to pay and competition in online auctions. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(2):324–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubé J.-P. H., Hitsch G. J., Rossi P. E. State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. (2010) 41(3):417–445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubé J.-P. H., Hitsch G. J., Rossi P. E., Vitorino M. A. Category pricing with state dependent utility. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):417–429LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elyakime B., Laffont J. J., Loisel P., Vuong Q. First-price sealed-bid auctions with secret reservation prices. Annales D'Economie et de Statistique (1994) 34:115–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haile P. A., Tamer E. Inference with an incomplete model of English auctions. J. Political Econom. (2003) 111(1):1–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haruvy E. E., Popkowski Leszczyc P. T. L. Bidder motives in cause-related auctions. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2009) 26(4):324–331CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haruvy E. E., Popkowski Leszczyc P. T. L. The impact of online auction duration. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):99–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Häubl G., Popkowski Leszczyc P. T. L. Minimum prices and product valuations in auctions. (2003) . MSI Report 03-117, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Heyman J. E., Orhun Y., Ariely D. Auction fever: The effect of opponents and quasi-endowment on product valuations. J. Interactive Marketing (2004) 18(4):7–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horsky D., Misra S., Nelson P. Observed and unobserved preference heterogeneity in brand-choice models. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(4):322–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hossain T., Morgan J. …Plus shipping and handling: Revenue (non) equivalence in field experiments on eBay. Adv. Econom. Anal. Policy (2006) 6(2). Article 3Google Scholar
  • Jank W., Shmueli G. Modeling concurrency of events in online auctions via spatio-temporal semiparametric models. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C (2007) 56(1):1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson D. The triangular distribution as a proxy for the beta distribution in risk analysis. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. D (1997) 46(3):387–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katkar R., Reiley D. H. Public versus secret reserve prices in eBay auctions: Results from a Pokémon field experiment. Adv. Econom. Anal. Policy (2006) 6(2). Article 7Google Scholar
  • Li S., Srinivasan K., Sun B. Internet auction features as quality signals. J. Marketing (2009) 73(1):75–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucking-Reiley D., Bryan D., Prasad N., Reeves D. Pennies from eBay: The determinants of price in online auctions. J. Indust. Econom. (2007) 55(2):223–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park Y.-H., Bradlow E. T. An integrated model for bidding behavior in Internet auctions: Whether, when, and how much. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(4):470–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peters M., Severinov S. Internet auctions with many traders. J. Econom. Theory (2006) 130(1):220–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Popkowski Leszczyc P. T. L., Häubl G. To bundle or not to bundle: Determinants of the profitability of multi-item auctions. J. Marketing (2010) 74(4):110–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reiley D. H. Field experiments on the effects of reserve prices in auctions: More Magic on the Internet. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(1):195–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth A. E., Ockenfels A. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on the Internet. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(4):1093–1103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sándor Z., Train K. Quasi-random simulation of discrete choice models. Transportation Res. Part B (2004) 38(4):313–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M. D., Bailey J., Brynjolfsson E., Brynjolfsson E., Kahin B. Understanding digital markets: Review and assessment. Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 99–136Google Scholar
  • Zeithammer R. Forward-looking bidding in online auctions. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):462–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithammer R., Adams C. The sealed-bid abstraction in online auctions. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(6):964–987LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.