How Peer Influence Affects Attribute Preferences: A Bayesian Updating Mechanism

References

• Amaldoss W., Jain S. Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):30–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argo J. J., Dahl D. W., Morales A. C. Positive consumer contagion: Responses to attractive others in a retail context. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(6):690–701Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aribarg A., Arora N., Kang M. Y. Predicting joint choice using individual data. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(1):139–157Link, Google Scholar
• Arora N., Allenby G. M. Measuring the influence of individual preference structures in group decision making. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(4):476–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden W. O., Etzel M. J. Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(September):183–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell D. R., Song S. Neighborhood effects and trial on the Internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(4):361–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Heath C. Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34(2):121–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow E. T., Hu Y., Ho T.-H. A learning-based model for imputing missing levels in partial conjoint profiles. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):369–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1991) 17(5):475–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calvó-Armengol A., Patacchini E., Zenou Y. Peer effects and social networks in education. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2009) 76(4):1239–1267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Childers T. L., Rao A. R. The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 19(2):198–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corfman K. P., Lehmann D. R. Models of cooperative group decision-making and relative influence: An experimental investigation of family purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1987) 14(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costenbader E., Valente T. W. The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Soc. Networks (2003) 25(4):283–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeGroot M. H.Optimal Statistical Decisions (1970) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Edwards Y. D., Allenby G. M. Multivariate analysis of multiple response data. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(3):321–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T. A dynamic analysis of market structure based on panel data. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(4):359–378Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Keane M. P. Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Sun B. An empirical investigation of the spillover effects of advertising and sales promotions in umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(4):408–420Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J. Estimating point centrality using different network sampling techniques. Soc. Networks (1991) 13(4):347–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbride T. J., Allenby G. M. A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):391–406Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D., Mayzlin D. Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(4):721–739Link, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Krieger A. M. Attribute importance weights modification in assessing a brand's competitive potential. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3, Part 1 of 2):253–270Link, Google Scholar
• Hallinan M. T., Williams R. A. The stability of students' interracial friendships. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1987) 52(5):653–664Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann W. R. Demand estimation with social interactions and the implications for targeted marketing. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(4):585–601Link, Google Scholar
• Hartmann W. R., Manchanda P., Nair H., Bothner M., Dodds P., Godes D., Hosanagar K., Tucker C. Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Lett. (2008) 19(3):287–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R., Van den Bulte C., Valente T. W. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):195–212Link, Google Scholar
• Jacoby J., Jaccard J. J., Currim I., Kuss A., Ansari A., Troutman T. Tracing the impact of item-by-item information accessing on uncertainty reduction. J. Consumer Res. (1994) 21(2):291–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn B. E., Meyer R. J. Consumer multiattribute judgments under attribute-weight uncertainty. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 17(4):508–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn B. E., Sarin R. K. Modeling ambiguity in decisions under uncertainty. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 15(2):265–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karmarkar U. R., Tormala Z. L. Believe me, I have no idea what I'm talking about: The effects of source certainty on consumer involvement and persuasion. J. Consumer Res. (2010) 36(6):1033–1049Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kratzer J., Lettl C. Distinctive roles of lead users and opinion leaders in the social networks of schoolchildren. J. Consumer Res. (2009) 36(December):646–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenk P. Simulation pseudo-bias correction to the harmonic mean estimator of integrated likelihoods. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. (2009) 18(4):941–960Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P., Xie Y., Youn N. The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(6):961–976Link, Google Scholar
• McFerran B., Dahl D. W., Fitzsimons G. F., Morales A. C. I'll have what she's having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. J. Consumer Res. (2010) 36(6):915–929Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer R. J. A model of multiattribute judgments under attribute uncertainty and informational constraint. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(4):428–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthukrishnan A. V., Pham M. T., Mungale A. Does greater amount of information always bolster attitudinal resistance? Marketing Lett. (2001) 12(2):131–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H. S., Manchanda P., Bhatia T. Asymmetric social interactions in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(5):883–895Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S., Manchanda P. Heterogeneous learning and the targeting of marketing communication for new products. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(3):424–441Link, Google Scholar
• Netzer O., Toubia O., Bradlow E. T., Dahan E., Evgeniou T., Feinberg F. M., Feit E. M., et al. Beyond conjoint analysis: Advances in preference measurement. Marketing Lett. (2008) 19(3–4):337–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newton M. A., Raftery A. E. Approximate Bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood bootstrap. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B (1994) 56(1):3–48Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan C. The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2004) 34(2):243–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao V. R., Steckel J. H. A polarization model for describing group preferences. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 18(1):108–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao V. R., Steckel J. H. Selecting, evaluating, and updating prospects in direct mail marketing. J. Direct Marketing (1995) 9(2):20–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts J. H., Urban G. L. Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. (1988) 34(2):167–185Link, Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(2):681–704Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salisbury L. C., Feinberg F. M. Alleviating the constant stochastic variance assumption in decision research: Theory, measurement, and experimental test. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(1):1–17Link, Google Scholar
• Shocker A. D., Srinivasan V. Multiattribute approaches for product concept evaluation and generation: A critical review. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(2):159–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sniezek J. A., Van Swol L. M. Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2001) 84(2):288–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnier P. G., Ainslie A., Otter T. Heterogeneity distributions of willingness-to-pay in choice models. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(3):313–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tormala Z. L., Petty R. E. What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2002) 83(6):1298–1313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train K.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valente T. W., Hoffman B. R., Ritt-Olson A., Lichtman K., Johnson C. A. Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. Amer. J. Public Health (2003) 93(11):1837–1843Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C., Wuyts S. H. K., Dekimpe M. G., Gijsbrechts E., Pieters F. G. M. Opportunities and challenges in studying customer networks. The Connected Customer: The Changing Nature of Consumer and Business Markets (2010) (Routledge, London) 7–35Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C., Lilien G. L. Medical Innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106(5):1409–1435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang S., Allenby G. M. Modeling interdependent consumer preferences. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(3):282–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang S., Narayan V., Assael H. Estimating the interdependence of television program viewership between spouses: A Bayesian simultaneous equation model. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(4):336–349Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J. The sound of silence: Evidence of observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(2):315–335Link, Google Scholar