Efficient Choice Designs for a Consider-Then-Choose Model

References

• Allenby G. M., Arora N., Ginter J. L. On the heterogeneity of demand. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):384–389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Araña J. E., León C. J., Hanemann M. W. Emotions and decision rules in discrete choice experiments for valuing health care programmes for the elderly. J. Health Econom. (2008) 27(3):753–769Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora N., Huber J. Improving parameter estimates and model prediction by aggregate customization in choice experiments. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(2):273–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman J.An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice (1979) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Bradlow E. T., Rao V. R. A hierarchical Bayes model for assortment choice. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):259–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbride T. J., Allenby G. M. A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):391–406Link, Google Scholar
• Gilbride T. J., Allenby G. M. Estimating heterogeneous EBA and economic screening rule choice models. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):494–509Link, Google Scholar
• Green P. E. On the design of choice expedments involving multifactor alternatives. J. Consumer Res. (1974) 1(2):61–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser J. R., Toubia O., Evgeniou T., Befurt R., Dzyabura D. Disjunctions of conjunctions, cognitive simplicity and consideration sets. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(3):485–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hess S., Train K. E., Polak J. W. On the use of a modified Latin hypercube sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of a mixed logit model for vehicle choice. Transportation Res. Part B (2006) 40(2):147–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J., Zwerina K. The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(3):307–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jedidi K., Kohli R. Probabilistic subset-conjunctive models for heterogeneous consumers. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(4):483–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jedidi K., Kohli R., DeSarbo W. S. Consideration sets in conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(3):364–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson R. A perspective on adaptive CBC (what can we expect from respondents?). (2008) . Sawtooth Software technical paper, Sequium, WA. http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/acbcperspective.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Kessels R., Goos P., Vandebroek M. A comparison of criteria to design efficient choice experiments. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):409–419Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessels R., Jones B., Goos P., Vanderbroek M. An efficient algorithm for constructing Bayesian optimal choice designs. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2009) 27(2):279–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Jedidi K. Probabilistic subset conjunction. Psychometrika (2005) 70(4):737–757Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Jedidi K. Representation and inference of lexicographic preference models and their variants. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):380–399Link, Google Scholar
• Kuhfeld W. F., Tobias R. Large factorial designs for product engineering and marketing research applications. Technometrics (2005) 47(2):132–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lussier D. A., Olshavsky R. W. Task complexity and contingent processing in brand choice. J. Consumer Res. (1979) 6(2):154–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics (1974) (Academic Press, New York) 105–142Google Scholar
• Meyer R. K., Nachtsheim C. J. The coordinate-exchange algorithm for constructing exact optimal experimental designs. Technometrics (1995) 37(1):60–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newton M., Raftery A. Approximate Bayesian inference with weighted likelihood bootstrap. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1994) 56(1):3–48Google Scholar
• Orme B. Fine-tuning CBC and adaptive CBC questionnaires. (2009) . Sawtooth Software technical paper, Sequium, WA. http://www.sawtooth-software.com/download/techpap/finetune.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Payne J. L. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making—An information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1976) 16(2):366–387Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M., McCulloch R.Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sándor Z., Wedel M. Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers' prior beliefs. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(4):430–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sándor Z., Wedel M. Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):455–475Link, Google Scholar
• Sándor Z., Wedel M. Heterogeneous conjoint choice designs. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(2):210–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter D. J., Best N. G., Carlin B. P., van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (2002) 64(4):583–639Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun F., Liu M.-Q., Lin D. K. J. Construction of orthogonal Latin hypercube designs. Biometrika (2009) 96(4):971–974Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait J. A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs. Transportation Res. Part B (2001) 35(10):903–928Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Hauser J. R. On managerially efficient experimental designs. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(6):851–858Link, Google Scholar
• van Nierop E., Bronnenberg B., Paap R., Wedel M., Franses P. H. Retrieving unobserved consideration sets from household panel data. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(1):63–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wedel M., Kamakura W. A., Arora N., Bemmaor A., Chiangm J., Elrod T., Johnson R., Lenk P., Neslin S., Poulsen C. S. Discrete and continuous representation of heterogeneity. Marketing Lett. (1999) 10(3):217–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu J., Goos P., Vanderbroek M. Efficient conjoint choice designs in the presence of respondent heterogeneity. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(1):122–135Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu W., Timmermans H. Modelling pedestrian go-home decisions: A comparison of linear and nonlinear compensatory, and conjunctive non-compensatory specifications. J. Retailing Consumer Services (2009) 16(3):227–231Crossref, Google Scholar