Testing Models of Strategic Behavior Characterized by Conditional Likelihoods

References

• Berry S. T. Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25(2):242–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B. J., Mahajan V. Unobserved retailer behavior in multimarket data: Joint spatial dependence in market shares and promotion variables. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(3):284–299Link, Google Scholar
• Carroll J. D., Green P. E., DeSarbo W. S. Optimizing the allocation of a fixed resource: A simple model and its experimental test. J. Marketing (1979) 43(1):51–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G., Griliches Z., Intrilligator M. D. Panel data. Handbook of Econometrics (1984) 2(North Holland, Amsterdam) 1247–1318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K., Erdem T., Rossi P. E., Wedel M. Structural modeling in marketing: Review and assessment. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):604–616Link, Google Scholar
• Dong X., Manchanda P., Chintagunta P. K. Quantifying the benefits of individual-level targeting in the presence of firm strategic behavior. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(2):207–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellickson P. B., Misra S. Supermarket pricing strategies. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(5):811–828Link, Google Scholar
• Gelfand A. E., Dey D. K. Bayesian model choice: Asymptotics and exact calculations. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1994) 56(3):501–514Google Scholar
• Horsky D., Nelson P. Evaluation of salesforce size and productivity through efficient frontier benchmarking. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(4):301–320Link, Google Scholar
• Lenk P. Simulation pseudo-bias correction to the harmonic mean estimator of integrated likelihoods. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. (2009) 18(4):941–960Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P., Rossi P. E., Chintagunta P. K. Response modeling with nonrandom marketing-mix variables. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):467–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantrala M. K., Shinha P., Zoltners A. A. Impact of resource allocation rules on marketing investment-level decisions and profitablility. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(2):162–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misra S., Nair H. A structural model of sales-force compensation dynamics: Estimation and field implementation. (2009) . Research Paper 2037, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1474462Google Scholar
• Misra S., Coughlan A. T., Narasimham C. Salesforce compensation: An analytical and empirical examination of the agency theoretic approach. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2005) 3(1):5–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morey R. C., McCann J. M. Estimating the confidence interval for the optimal marketing mix: An application to lead generation. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(2):193–202Link, Google Scholar
• Newton M. A., Raftery A. E. Approximate Bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood bootstrap. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1994) 56(1):3–48Google Scholar
• Reiss P. C., Wolak F. A., Heckman J. J., Leamer E. E. Structural econometric modeling: Rationales and examples from industrial organization. Handbook of Econometrics (2007) 6A(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 4277–4415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M., McCulloch R.Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M., Winer R. S. Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1324–1238Link, Google Scholar
• Yang S., Chen Y., Allenby G. M. Bayesian analysis of simultaneous demand and supply. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(3):251–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellner A., Kmenta J., Drèze J. Specification and estimation of Cobb-Douglas production function models. Econometrica (1966) 34(4):784–795Crossref, Google Scholar