Marketing of Vice Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Package Size Decision

References

• Amaldoss W., Jain S. Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):30–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagnoli M., Bergstrom T. Log-concave probability and its applications. Econom. Theory (2005) 26(2):445–469Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barba G., Troiano E., Russo P., Siani A.ARCA Project Study Group Total fat, fat distribution and blood pressure according to eating frequency in children living in southern Italy: The ARCA Project. Internat. J. Obesity (2006) 30(7):1166–1169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett J. The 100-calorie snack attack. Newsweek (2004) 148(6):134Google Scholar
• Beulens J. W., van Beers R. M., Stolk R. P., Schaafsma G., Hendriks H. F. The effect of moderate alcohol consumption on fat distribution and adipocytokines. Obesity (2006) 14(1):60–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter G. S., Nakamoto K. Competitive strategies for late entry into a market with a “dominant brand”. Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1268–1278Link, Google Scholar
• Carrillo J. D., Mariotti T. Strategic ignorance as a self-disciplining device. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2000) 67(3):529–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Center for Science in the Public Interest Consumers pay hefty premium for air, packaging in 100-calorie packs. (2007) . Press release (August 14), Washington, DC, http://www.cspinet.org/new/200708141_print.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Cochran W., Tessler A., Martin L., Tessler A. The “what the hell effect”: Some effects of goal proximity and goal framing on performance. Striving and Feeling: Interaction Among Goals, Affect, and Self-Regulation (1996) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 99–120Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S., Malmendier U. Contract design and self-control: Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 129(2):353–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobson P. W., Gerstner E. For a few cents more: Why supersize unhealthy food? Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(4):770–778Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Levine D. K. A dual-self model of impulse control. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(5):1449–1476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Villas-Boas J. M., Hendershott T. J. Behavior-based price discrimination and customer recognition. Handbook on Economics and Information Systems (2006) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 377–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geier A. B., Rozin P., Doros G. Unit bias: A new heuristic that helps explain the effect of portion. Psych. Sci. (2006) 17(6):521–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilpatric S. M. Search for related content slippage in rebate programs and present-biased preferences. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(2):229–238Link, Google Scholar
• Goff K. G. Calorie snacks; portion control is in the (little) bag. Washington Times (2008) April 21):B.1Google Scholar
• Gul F., Pesendorfer W. Temptation and self-control. Econometrica (2001) 69(6):1403–1446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L. Consumption flexibility, product configuration, and market competition. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(2):116–130Link, Google Scholar
• Gruber J., Kőszegi B. Is addiction “rational?” Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(4):1261–1303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris C., Laibson D., Dewatripont M., Hansen L. P., Turnovsky S. J. Hyperbolic discounting and consumption. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Eighth World Congress (2002) 1(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 258–298Google Scholar
• Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Econom. J. (1929) 39(153):41–57Google Scholar
• Iyer G., Soberman D. Markets for product modification information. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(3):203–225Link, Google Scholar
• Jacobson M. F., Brownell K. D. Small taxes on soft drinks and snack foods to promote health. Amer. J. Public Health (2000) 90(6):854–857Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain S. Self-control and optimal goals: A theoretical analysis. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(6):1027–1045Link, Google Scholar
• Jenkins D. J., Josse R. G., Jenkins A. L., Wolever T. M., Vuksan V. Implications of altering the rate of carbohydrate absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Clinical Investigative Medicine (1995) 18(4):296–302Google Scholar
• Jeuland A. P., Shugan S. M. Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):239–272Link, Google Scholar
• Koenigsberg O., Kohli R., Montoya R. Package size decisions. Management Sci. (2010) 56(3):485–494Link, Google Scholar
• Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(2):443–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machado F. S., Sinha R. K. Smoking cessation: A model of planned vs. actual behavior for time-inconsistent consumers. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(6):834–850Link, Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Doing it now or doing it later. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(1):103–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. The economics of immediate gratification. J. Behav. Decision Making (2000) 13(2):233–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Choice and procrastination. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(1):121–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue T., Rabin M., Loewenstein G., Read D., Baumeister R. F. Self-awareness and self-control. Time and Decision: Economic Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice (2003) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) 217–243Google Scholar
• Oi W. Y. A Disneyland dilemma: Two-part tariffs for a Mickey Mouse monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. (1971) 85(1):77–96Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raghunathan R., Naylor R. W., Hoyer W. D. The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. J. Marketing (2006) 70(4):170–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rolls B. J., Morris E. L., Roe L. S. Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women. Amer. J. Clinical Nutrition (2002) 76(6):1207–1213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott M. L., Nowlis S. M., Mandel N., Morales A. C. The effects of reduced food size and package size on the consumption behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. J. Consumer Res. (2008) 35(3):391–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seiders K., Petty R. D. Obesity and the role of food marketing: A policy analysis of issues and remedies. J. Pubic Policy Marketing (2004) 23(2):153–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stole L. A., Armstrong M., Porter R. Price discrimination and competition. Handbook of Industrial Organization (2007) 3(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 2221–2299Google Scholar
• Subramaniam R., Gal-Or E. Quantity discounts in differentiated consumer product markets. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(1):180–192Link, Google Scholar
• Syam N., Krishnamurthy P., Hess J. D. That's what I thought I wanted? Miswanting and regret for a standard food in a mass-customized world. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):379–397Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H., Shefrin H. M. An economic theory of self-control. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89(2):392–406Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vartanian L. R., Schwartz M. B., Brownell K. D. Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Amer. J. Public Health (2007) 97(4):667–675Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M. Dynamic competition with customer recognition. RAND J. Econom. (1999) 30(4):604–631Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M. Product variety and endogenous pricing with evaluation costs. Management Sci. (2009) 55(8):1338–1346Link, Google Scholar
• Wansink B. Can package size accelerate usage volume? J. Marketing (1996) 60(3):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B. Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. Annual Rev. Nutrition (2004) 24:455–479Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B., Huckabee M. De-marketing obesity. Calif. Management Rev. (2005) 47(4):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wertenbroch K. Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(4):317–337Link, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. A rational reconstruction of the compromise effect: Using market data to infer utilities. J. Consumer Res. (1995) 21(4):627–633Crossref, Google Scholar