Active Machine Learning for Consideration Heuristics

References

• Arora N., Huber J. Improving parameter estimates and model prediction by aggregate customization in choice experiments. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(2):273–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attias H., Laskey K. B., Prade H. Inferring parameters and structure of latent variable models by variational Bayes. Proc. 15th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (UAI-99) (1999) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 21–30Google Scholar
• Breese J. S., Heckerman D., Kadie C. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. Proc. 14th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (UAI-98) (1998) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 43–52Google Scholar
• Chaloner K., Verdinelli I. Bayesian experimental design: A review. Statist. Sci. (1995) 10(3):273–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahan E., Hauser J. R. The virtual customer. J. Product Innovation Management (2002) 19(5):332–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dieckmann A., Dippold K., Dietrich H. Compensatory versus noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences. Judgment Decision Making (2009) 4(3):200–213Google Scholar
• Ding M., Hauser J. R., Dong S., Dzyabura D., Yang Z., Su C., Gaskin S. Unstructured direct elicitation of decision rules. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(February):116–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Swait J. Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(1):191–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evgeniou T., Boussios C., Zacharia G. Generalized robust conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):415–429Link, Google Scholar
• Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. (2005) 19(4):25–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghahramani Z., Beal M. J. Variational inference for Bayesian mixtures of factor analyzers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2000) 12(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Ghahramani Z., Beal M. J. Propagation algorithms for variational Bayesian learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2001) 13(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G., Goldstein D. G. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. (1996) 103(4):650–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G., Selten R.Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G., Todd P. M.The ABC Research GroupSimple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (1999) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Gilbride T. J., Allenby G. M. A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):391–406Link, Google Scholar
• Gilbride T. J., Allenby G. M. Estimating heterogeneous EBA and economic screening rule choice models. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):494–509Link, Google Scholar
• Green P. E. Hybrid models for conjoint analysis: An expository review. J. Marketing Res. (1984) 21(2):155–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J. Marketing (1990) 54(4):3–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Krieger A. M., Bansal P. Completely unacceptable levels in conjoint analysis: A cautionary note. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(August):293–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser J. R. Testing the accuracy, usefulness, and significance of probabilistic choice models: An information-theoretic approach. Oper. Res. (1978) 26(3):406–421Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser J. R., Wernerfelt B. An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 16(4):393–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser J. R., Toubia O., Evgeniou T., Befurt R., Dzyabura D. Disjunctions of conjunctions, cognitive simplicity, and consideration sets. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(June):485–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jedidi K., Kohli R. Probabilistic subset-conjunctive models for heterogeneous consumers. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(4):483–494Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Jedidi K. Representation and inference of lexicographic preference models and their variants. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):380–399Link, Google Scholar
• Kullback S., Leibler R. A. On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. (1951) 22(1):79–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis D. D., Gale W. A. Training text classifiers by uncertainty sampling. Proc. 17th Annual Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Dev. Inform. Retrieval (1994) Dublin, Ireland:3–12Google Scholar
• Liberali G., Urban G. L., Hauser J. R. Field experiments: Providing unbiased competitive information to encourage trust, consideration, and sales. (2011) . Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Lindley D. V. On a measure of the information provided by an experiment. Ann. Math. Statist. (1956) 27(4):986–1005Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little J. D. C. Managers and models: The concept of a decision calculus. Management Sci. (2004a) 50(12, Supplement):1841–1853[Reprinted from 1970.]Link, Google Scholar
• Little J. D. C. Comments on “Models and managers: The concept of a decision calculus”: Managerial models for practice. Management Sci. (2004b) 50(12, Supplement):1854–1860Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Q., Arora N. Efficient choice designs for a consider-then-choose model. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):321–338Link, Google Scholar
• Martignon L., Hoffrage U. Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparisons. Theory Decision (2002) 52(1):29–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (1988) 14(3):534–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J.The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rényi A. On measures of information and entropy. Proc. 4th Berkeley Sympos. Math., Statistics, Probability (1961) (University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley) 547–561Google Scholar
• Sándor Z., Wedel M. Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):455–475Link, Google Scholar
• Sawtooth Software ACA system: Adaptive conjoint analysis. ACA Manual (1996) (Sawtooth Software, Sequim, WA) Google Scholar
• Sawtooth Software CBC hierarchical Bayes analysis. (2004) . Technical paper, Sawtooth Software, Sequim, WAGoogle Scholar
• Sawtooth Software ACBC. (2008) . Technical paper, Sawtooth Software, Sequim, WAGoogle Scholar
• Shannon C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. (1948) 27(July and October):379–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Hauser J. R. On managerially efficient experimental designs. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(6):851–858Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Hauser J. R., Garcia R. Probabilistic polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis: Theory and application. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(5):596–610Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Hauser J. R., Simester D. I. Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(February):116–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. (1972) 79(4):281–299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban G. L., Hauser J. R. “Listening in” to find and explore new combinations of customer needs. J. Marketing (2004) 68(2):72–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Nierop E., Bronnenberg B., Paap R., Wedel M., Franses P. H. Retrieving unobserved consideration sets from household panel data. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(February):63–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vriens M., Wedel M., Sándor Z. Split-questionnaire designs: A new tool in survey design. Marketing Res. (2001) 13(2):14–19Google Scholar
• Wilkie W. L., Pessemier E. A. Issues in marketing's use of multi-attribute attitude models. J. Marketing Res. (1973) 10(4):428–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yedidia J. S., Freeman W. T., Weiss Y., Lakemeyer G., Nebel B. Understanding belief propagation and its generalizations. Exploring Artificial Intelligence in the New Millennium (2003) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 239–269Google Scholar
• Yee M., Dahan E., Hauser J. R., Orlin J. Greedoid-based noncompensatory inference. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(4):532–549Link, Google Scholar