Competing for Low-End Markets

References

• Amaldoss W., He C. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs: A strategic analysis. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(3):472–487Link, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W., Jain S. Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking. Management Sci. (2005) 51(10):1449–1466Link, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W., Jain S. Trading up: A strategic analysis of reference group effects. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(5):932–942Link, Google Scholar
• Ansari A., Economides N., Ghosh A. Competitive positioning in markets with nonuniform preferences. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(3):248–273Link, Google Scholar
• Barreda-Tarrazona I., García-Gallego A., Georgantzís N., Andaluz-Funcia J., Gil-Sanz A. An experiment on spatial competition with endogenous pricing. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2011) 29(1):74–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus B. L., Jain S., Rao A. G. Too little, too early: Introduction timing and new product performance in the personal digital assistant industry. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):50–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow E. T. Editorial: Marketing science and the financial crisis. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(2):201Link, Google Scholar
• Carare O., Haruvy E., Prasad A. Hierarchical thinking and learning in rank order contests. Experiment. Econom. (2007) 10(3):305–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers C., Kouvelis P., Semple J. Quality-based competition, profitability, and variable costs. Management Sci. (2006) 52(12):1884–1895Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P. S., Matur S., Srinivasan K. Quantity discounts in emerging markets. (2008) . Working paper, Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, MontrealGoogle Scholar
• Donnenfeld S., Weber S. Limit qualities and entry deterrence. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(1):113–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N., Gilovich T. The anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psych. Sci. (2006) 17(4):311–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz J. J., Thisse J.-F. Price competition, quality, and income disparities. J. Econom. Theory (1979) 20(3):340–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T.-H., Camerer C. F., Chong J.-K. Self-tuning experience-weighted attraction learning in games. J. Econom. Theory (2007) 133(1):177–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T.-H., Wang X., Camerer C. Individual differences in the EWA learning with partial payoff information. Econom. J. (2008) 118(525):37–59Google Scholar
• Huck S., Müller W., Vriend N. J. The east end, the west end, and king's cross: On clustering in the four-player Hotelling game. Econom. Inquiry (2002) 40(2):231–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishibashi I., Matsushima N. The existence of low-end firms may help high-end firms. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(1):136–147Link, Google Scholar
• Jing B. On the profitability of firms in a differentiated industry. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(3):248–259Link, Google Scholar
• Koenigsberg O., Kohli R., Montoya R. Package size decisions. Management Sci. (2007) 56(3):485–494Link, Google Scholar
• Lehmann-Grube U. Strategic choice of quality when quality is costly: The persistence of the high-quality advantage. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28(2):372–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin A., Lin C.-F., Chu C.-S. J. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J. Econom. (2002) 108(1):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim N., Ahearne M. J., Ham S. H. Designing sales contests: Does the prize structure matter? J. Marketing Res. (2007) 46(3):356–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S. Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(4):288–307Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S. Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168Link, Google Scholar
• Motta M. Endogenous quality choice: Price vs. quantity competition. J. Indust. Econom. (1993) 41(2):113–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussa M., Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory (1978) 18(2):301–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panayiotou G., Vrana S. R. The role of self-focus, task difficulty, task self-relevance, and evaluation anxiety in reaction time performance. Motivation Emotion (2004) 28(2):171–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parco J., Rapoport A., Amaldoss W. Two-stage contests with budget constraints: An experimental study. J. Math. Psych. (2005) 49(4):320–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahalad C. K.The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits (2006) (Wharton School Publishing, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
• Prescott E. C., Visscher M. Sequential location among firms with foresight. Bell J. Econom. (1977) 8(2):378–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simester D., Hu Y. J., Brynjolfsson E., Anderson E. T. Dynamics of retail advertising: Evidence from a field experiment. Econom. Inquiry (2009) 47(3):482–499Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A., Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49(1):3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Van Boven L., Dunning D., Loewnstein G. Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: Misperceptions of the endowment effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 79(1):66–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M. Communication strategies and product line design. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):304–316Link, Google Scholar
• Wauthy X. Quality choice in models of vertical differentiation. J. Indust. Econom. (1996) 44(3):345–353Crossref, Google Scholar