The Sense and Non-Sense of Holdout Sample Validation in the Presence of Endogeneity

References

• Allenby G. M. Cross-validation, the Bayes theorem, and small-sample bias. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1990) 8(2):171–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allenby G. M., Rossi P. E. Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. J. Econometrics (1999) 89(1/2):57–78Google Scholar
• Andrews R. L., Currim I. S. Multi-stage purchase decision models: Accommodating response heterogeneity, common demand shocks, and endogeneity using disaggregate data. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2009) 26(3):197–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist J. D., Imbens G. W. Two-stage least squares estimation of average causal effects in models with variable treatment intensity. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90(430):431–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S. T. Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25(2):242–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko D., Gupta S., Jain D. Logit demand estimation under competitive pricing behavior: An equilibrium framework. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11, Part 1):1533–1547Link, Google Scholar
• Bijmolt T. H. A., van Heerde H. J., Pieters R. G. M. New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(2):141–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B. J., Mahajan V. Unobserved retailer behavior in multimarket data: Joint spatial dependence in market shares and promotion variables. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(3):284–299Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K. Endogeneity and heterogeneity in a probit demand model: Estimation using aggregate data. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(4):442–456Link, Google Scholar
• Cooil B., Winer R. S., Rados D. L. Cross-validation for prediction. J. Marketing Res. (1987) 24(3):271–279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson R., MacKinnon J. G.Estimation and Inference in Econometrics (1993) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Drèze X., Nisol P., Vilcassim N. J. Do promotions increase store expenditures? A descriptive study of household shopping behavior. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(1):59–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franses P. H. On the use of econometric models for policy simulation in marketing. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):4–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2003) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hagerty M. R., Srinivasan S. Comparing the predictive powers of alternative multiple regression models. Psychometrika (1991) 56(1):77–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanssens D. M., Parsons L. J., Schultz R. L.Market Response Models, Econometric and Time Series Analysis (2001) 2nd ed.(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
• Hoch S. J., Drèze X., Purk M. E. EDLP, hi-lo, and margin arithmetic. J. Marketing (1994) 58(4):16–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P.A Guide to Econometrics (1992) 3rd ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Kleibergen F., Zivot E. Bayesian and classical approaches to instrumental variables regression. J. Econometrics (2003) 114(1):29–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leeflang P. S. H., Wittink D. R., Wedel M., Naert P. A.Building Models for Marketing Decisions (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leenheer J., van Heerde H. J., Bijmolt T. H. A., Smidts A. Do loyalty programs really enhance behavioral loyalty? An empirical analysis accounting for self-selecting members. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2007) 24(1):31–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neslin S. A. A market response model for coupon promotions. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(2):125–145Link, Google Scholar
• Petrin A., Train K. A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(1):3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Picard R. R., Cook R. D. Cross-validation of regression models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1984) 79(387):575–583Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M., McCulloch R.Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shmueli G. To explain or to predict? Statist. Sci. (2010) 25(3):289–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Endogeneity in marketing decision models. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):1–3Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Relevancy is robust prediction, not alleged realism. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(5):991–998Link, Google Scholar
• Steckel J. H., Vanhonacker W. R. Cross-validating regression models in marketing research. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(4):415–427Link, Google Scholar
• Tsang E. W. K. Assumptions, explanation, and prediction in marketing science: “It's the findings, stupid, not the assumptions”. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(5):986–990Link, Google Scholar
• van Dijk A., van Heerde H. J., Leeflang P. S. H., Wittink D. R. Similarity-based spatial methods to estimate shelf space elasticities. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(3):257–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Heerde H. J., Dekimpe M. G., Putsis W. P. Marketing models and the Lucas critique. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):15–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verbeek M.A Guide to Modern Econometrics (2008) 3rd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M., Winer R. S. Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1324–1338Link, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar