Competitive Strategy for Open Source Software
Published Online:1 Nov 2011https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0669
References
- Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards. Software Quality J. (2003) 11(4):325–338Crossref, Google Scholar
- Open source software user communities: A study of participation in Linux user groups. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1099–1115Link, Google Scholar
- Software Engineering Economics (1981) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
- Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1072–1084Link, Google Scholar
- Mixed source. Management Sci. (2011) 57(7):1212–1230Link, Google Scholar
- Signaling games and stable equilibria. Quart. J. Econom. (1987) 102(2):179–221Crossref, Google Scholar
- Is Linux better than Windows software? IEEE Software (2009) 26(3):103–104Crossref, Google Scholar
- Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1057–1071Link, Google Scholar
- Economist, The Open-source software in the recession: Born free. (2009) May 28). http://www.economist.com/node/13743278Google Scholar
- Open source software: Motivation and restrictive licensing. Internat. Econom. Econom. Policy (2007) 4(2):209–225Crossref, Google Scholar
- How Microsoft warded off rival. New York Times (2003) May 15). http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/15/technology/15SOFT.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Gartner Group Gartner highlights key predictions for It organisations and users in 2008 and beyond. (2008) . Press release (January 31), Egham, UK. http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=593207Google Scholar
- Innovation Happens Elsewhere: Open Source as Business Strategy (2005) 1st ed.(Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Red Hat tops list of corporate Linux code contributors. Software Development Times (2008) September 18). http://www.sdtimes.com/link/32870Google Scholar
- Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2002) 6(3):25–39Crossref, Google Scholar
- IDC Worldwide open source services 2009–2013 forecast. (2009) . Report, IDC, Framingham, MAGoogle Scholar
- InfoWorld Open-source platforms: IBM invests almost $1 billion in Linux. (2000) December 18):16Google Scholar
- Measuring software product quality: A survey of ISO/IEC 9126. IEEE Software (2004) 21(5):88–92Crossref, Google Scholar
- How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy (2003) 32(6):923–943Crossref, Google Scholar
- Understand Open Source and Free Software Licencing (2004) (O'Reilly, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- Skill signalling with product market externality. Econom. J. (2009) 119(539):1130–1142Google Scholar
- Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 50(2):197–234Crossref, Google Scholar
- Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168Link, Google Scholar
- Competing on open source: Strategies and practise. (2002) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. http://opensource.mit.edu/online_papers.phpGoogle Scholar
- Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach (2004) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
- The Power of Co-Creation: Build It with Them to Boost Growth, Productivity, and Profits (2010) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
- The economic motivation of open source software: Stakeholder perspectives. Computer (2007) 40(4):25–32Crossref, Google Scholar
- Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):984–999Link, Google Scholar
- Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. J. Interactive Marketing (2005) 19(4):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
- Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49(1):3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
- Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. (1973) 87(3):355–374Crossref, Google Scholar
- Feature fatigue: When product capabilities become too much of a good thing. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(4):431–442Crossref, Google Scholar

