Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation

References

• Ambady N., Rosenthal R. Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1993) 64(3):431–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bacon-Macé N., Macé M. J. M., Fabre-Thorpe M., Thorpe S. J. The time course of visual processing: Backward masking and natural scene categorization. Vision Res. (2005) 45(11):1459–1469Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar M. Visual objects in context. Nature Rev. Neurosci. (2004) 5(8):617–629Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett F. C.Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology (1932) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Biederman I., Kubovy M., Pomerantz J. R. On the semantics of a glance at a scene. Perceptual Organization (1981) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 213–263Google Scholar
• Christie J., Klein R. Familiarity and attention: Does what we know affect what we notice? Memory Cognition (1995) 23(5):547–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher P. J., Lee J., Kerbache L. Optimal Internet media selection. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(2):336–347Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J., Mazursky D., Solomon S. The fundamental templates of quality ads. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):333–351Link, Google Scholar
• Gonser S. The downside of the advertorial boom. Folio (2003) November 1). http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3065/is_11_32/ai_109384455/Google Scholar
• Goodstein R. C. Category-based applications and extensions in advertising: Motivating more extensive ad processing. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(1):87–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene M. R., Oliva A. Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psych. (2009) 58(2):137–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grill-Spector K., Kanwisher N. Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psych. Sci. (2005) 16(2):152–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris C., Hainline L., Abramov I., Lemerise E., Camenzuli C. The distribution of fixation durations in infants and naive adults. Vision Res. (1988) 28(3):419–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heekeren H. R., Marrettand S., Ungerleider L. G. The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nature Rev. Neurosci. (2008) 9(6):467–479Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoyer W. D., MacInnis D. J.Consumer Behavior (2001) 2nd ed.(Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Jacoby J., Hoyer W. D. The comprehension/miscomprehension of print communication: Selected findings. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 15(4):343–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janiszewski C. The influence of display characteristics on visual exploratory search behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(3):290–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karremans J. C., Stroebe W., Claus J. Beyond Vicary's fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming on brand choice. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2006) 42(6):792–798Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg O., Bhatnagar V.Authorware7 (2005) (Macromedia, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Koriat A. Subjective confidence in one's answer: The consensuality principle. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2008) 34(4):945–959Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunda Z., Spencer S. J. When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psych. Bull. (2003) 129(4):522–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri K., Gao J. Bayesian analysis of nested logit model by Markov chain Monte Carlo. J. Econometrics (2002) 111(1):103–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamberts K. Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. Psych. Rev. (2000) 107(2):227–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loftus G. R., Harley E. M. How different spatial-frequency components contribute to visual information acquisition. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (2004) 30(1):104–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loschky L. C., McConkie G. W., Yang J., Miller M. E. The limits of visual resolution in natural scene viewing. Visual Cognition (2005) 12(6):1057–1092Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lunn D. J., Thomas A., Best N., Spiegelhalter D. Winbugs—A Bayesian modeling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statist. Comput. (2000) 10(4):325–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mack M. L., Gauthier I., Sadr J., Palmeri T. J. Object detection and basic-level categorization: Sometimes you know it is there before you know what it is. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (2008) 15(1):28–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandler G., Clark M. S., Fiske S. T. The structure of value: Accounting for taste. Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (1982) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 3–36Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J., Malaviya P. Consumers' processing of persuasive advertisements: An integrative framework of persuasion theories. J. Marketing (1999) 63(Special issue):45–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J., Tybout A. M. Schema-congruity as a basis for product evaluation. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 16(1):39–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mick D. G. Levels of subjective comprehension in advertising processing and their relations to ad perceptions, attitudes, and memory. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 18(4):411–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noordewier M. K., Stapel D. A. Affects of the unexpected: When inconsistency feels good (or bad). Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2010) 36(5):642–654Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliva A., Itti L., Rees G., Tsotsos J. K. Gist of the scene. Neurobiology of Attention (2005) (Elsevier, New York) 251–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliva A., Schyns P. G. Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual images. Cognitive Psych. (1997) 34(1):72–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Outing S., Ruel L. Obersvations on advertising. (2004) . Eyetrack III. Retrieved March 2011, http://www.poynterextra.org/eyetrack2004/advertising.htmGoogle Scholar
• Peracchio L. A., Luna D. The role of thin-slice judgments in consumer psychology. J. Consumer Psych. (2006) 16(1):25–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R., Wedel M. Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial and text-size effects. J. Marketing (2004) 68(2):36–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R., Warlop L., Wedel M. Breaking through the clutter: Benefits of advertisement originality and familiarity for brand attention and memory. Management Sci. (2002) 48(6):765–781Link, Google Scholar
• Pieters R., Wedel M., Batra R. The stopping power of advertising: Measures and effects of visual complexity. J. Marketing (2010) 74(5):48–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratneswar S., Chaiken S. Comprehension's role in persuasion: The case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 18(1):52–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayner K., Castelhano M. S., Wedel M., Pieters R. Eye movements during reading, scene perception, visual search, and while looking at print ads. Visual Marketing: From Attention to Action (2007) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York) 9–42Google Scholar
• Rosch E., Mervis C. B., Gray W. D., Johnson D. M., Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psych. (1976) 8(3):382–439Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousselet G. A., Joubert O. R., Fabre-Thorpe M. How long to get the “gist” of real-world natural scenes? Visual Cognition (2005) 12(6):852–877Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scalf P. E., Beck D. M. Competition in visual cortex impedes attention to multiple items. J. Neurosci. (2010) 30(1):161–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silvia P. J. Interest—The curious emotion. Current Directions Psych. Sci. (2008) 17(1):57–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skinner E. A. A guide to constructs of control. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 71(3):549–570Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith P. L., Ratcliff R. An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. Psych. Rev. (2009) 116(2):283–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith R. E., MacKenzie S. B., Yang X., Buchholz L. M., Darley W. K. Modeling the determinants and effects of creativity in advertising. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(6):819–833Link, Google Scholar
• Strahan E. J., Spencer S. J., Zanna M. P. Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2002) 38(6):556–568Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Lans R., Pieters R., Wedel M. Competitive brand salience. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(5):922–931Link, Google Scholar
• Wedel M., Pieters R. Eye fixations on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):297–312Link, Google Scholar
• Winkielman P., Halberstadt J., Fazendeiro T., Catty S. Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psych. Sci. (2006) 17(9):799–806Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Yang X., Smith R. E. Beyond attention effects: Modeling the persuasive and emotional effects of advertising creativity. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(5):935–949Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J., Wedel M., Pieters R. Sales effects of attention to feature advertisements: A Bayesian mediation analysis. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(5):669–681Crossref, Google Scholar