Structural Workshop Paper—Discrete-Choice Models of Consumer Demand in Marketing

References

• Ackerberg D., Benkard L., Berry S., Pakes A., Heckman J. J., Leamer E. E. Econometric tools for analyzing market outcomes. Handbook of Econometrics (2007) 6A(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 4172–4209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albuquerque P., Bronnenberg B. J. Estimating demand heterogeneity using aggregated data: An application to the frozen pizza category. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(2):356–372Link, Google Scholar
• Allenby G. M., Rossi P. E. Quality perceptions and asymmetric switching between brands. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(3):185–205Link, Google Scholar
• Allenby G. M., Rossi P. E. Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. J. Econometrics (1999) 89(1–2):57–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allenby G. M., Garratt M. J., Rossi P. E. A model for trade-up and change in considered brands. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(1):40–56Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson S. P., de Palma A., Thisse F.Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson E., Simester D. Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales: Evidence from field experiments. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(1):93–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora N., Allenby G. M., Ginter J. L. A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and secondary demand. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):29–44Link, Google Scholar
• Bajari P., Hortacsu A. Are structural estimates of auction models reasonable? Evidence from experimental data. J. Political Econom. (2005) 113(4):703–741Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass F. M. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(5):215–227Link, Google Scholar
• Benkard C. L. A dynamic analysis of the market for wide-bodied commercial aircraft. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2004) 71(7):581–611Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 60(4):841–890Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhat C. R. The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions. Transportation Res. Part B (2008) 42(3):274–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhat C. R., Pinjari A. R. The generalized multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (GMDCEV) model: Allowing for non-additively separable and flexible utility forms. (2010) . Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, AustinGoogle Scholar
• Braun M., Bonfrer A. Scalable inference of customer similarities from interactions data using Dirichlet processes. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(3):513–531Link, Google Scholar
• Briesch R., Chintagunta R., Matzkin R. Semi-parametric estimation of brand choice behavior. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2002) 97(460):973–983Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briesch R., Chintagunta R., Matzkin R. Nonparametric discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2010) 28(2):291–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B. J., Kruger M., Mela C. F. The IRI academic data set. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(4):745–748Link, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B. J., Dubé J.-P. H., Gentzkow M. The evolution of brand preferences: Evidence from consumer migration. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Chan T. Y. Estimating a continuous hedonic-choice model with an application to demand for soft drinks. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 37(2):466–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan T., Padmanabhan V., Seetharaman P. B. An econometric model of location and pricing in the gasoline market. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):622–635Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee R., Eliashberg J. The innovation diffusion process in a heterogeneous population: A micromodeling approach. Management Sci. (1990) 36(9):1057–1079Link, Google Scholar
• Chiang J. A simultaneous approach to the whether, what, and how much to buy questions. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(4):297–315Link, Google Scholar
• Chiang J., Lee J.-F. Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand with binding nonnegativity constraints. J. Econometrics (1992) 54(1–3):79–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K. Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice and purchase quantity decisions of households. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(2):184–208Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P., Jiang R., Jin G. Information, learning and drug diffusion: The case of Cox-2 inhibitors. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2009) 7(4):399–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P., Erdem T., Rossi P. E., Wedel M. Structural modeling in marketing: A review and assessment. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):581–605Link, Google Scholar
• Christiansen L. R., Jorgensen D. W., Lau L. J. Transcendental logarithmic utility functions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1975) 65(3):367–383Google Scholar
• Cho S., Rust J. Is econometrics useful for private policy making? A case study of replacement policy at an auto rental company. J. Econometrics (2008) 145(1–2):243–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clements K. W., Selvanathan E. A. The Rotterdam demand model and its application in marketing. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(1):60–75Link, Google Scholar
• Davis P., Ribeiro R. A simple globally consistent continuous demand model for market level data. (2010) . Working paper, London School of Economics and Political Science, LondonCrossref, Google Scholar
• Deaton A., Muellbauer J.Economics and Consumer Behavior (1980) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekimpe M., Hanssens D. M. The persistence of marketing effects on sales. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Drèze X., Nisol P., Vilcassim N. J. Do promotions increase store expenditures? A descriptive study of household shopping behavior. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(1):59–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J.-P. Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):66–81Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé J.-P., Hitsch G., Manchanda P. An empirical model of advertising dynamics. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2005) 3(2):107–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J.-P. H., Hitsch G. J., Chintagunta P. K. Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Sci. (2010a) 29(2):216–249Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé J.-P., Hitsch G., Jindal P. Estimating durable goods adoption decisions from stated preference data. (2010b) . Working paper, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
• Dubé J.-P., Chintagunta P., Bronnenberg B., Goettler R., Petrin A., Seetheraman P. B., Sudhir K., Thomadsen R., Zhao Y. Structural applications of the discrete choice model. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(3):207–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubin J. A., McFadden D. L. An econometric analysis of electricity appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica (1984) 52(2):345–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckstein Z., Horsky D., Raban Y. An empirical dynamic model of optimal brand choice. (1988) . Working paper, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelGoogle Scholar
• Ellickson P., Misra S. Enriching interactions: Incorporating outcome data into static discrete games. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Erdem T., Keane M. P. Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Imai S., Keane M. P. Brand and quantity choice dynamics under price uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(1):5–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Keane M. P., Strebel J. Learning about computers: An analysis of information search and technology choice. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2005) 3(3):207–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fong W., Godsill S. J. Sequential monte carlo simulation of dynamical models with slowly varying parameters: Application to audio. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing (2002) 2(IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 1605–1608Google Scholar
• Fong N. M., Simester D. I., Anderson E. T. Private label vs. national brand price sensitivity: Evaluating non-experimental identification strategies. (2010) . Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Fox J., il Kim K., Ryan S., Bajari P. A simple nonparametric estimator for the distribution of random coefficients. (2011) . Working paper, University of Michigan, MinneapolisCrossref, Google Scholar
• Gauri D., Sudhir K., Talukdar D. The temporal and spatial dimensions of price search: Insights from matching household survey and purchase data. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(2):226–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M. Valuing new goods in a model with complementarity: Online newspapers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(3):713–744Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goettler R. L., Clay K. Tariff choice with consumer learning and switching costs. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(4):633–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A., Xiao M. Who thinks about the competition? Managerial ability and strategic entry in U.S. local telephone markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon B. R. A dynamic model of consumer replacement cycles in the PC processor industry. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(5):846–867Link, Google Scholar
• Gorman W. M. Separable utility and aggregation. Econometrica (1959) 27(3):469–481Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadagni P. M., Little J. D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):203–238Link, Google Scholar
• Hajivassiliou V. A., McFadden D. L., Ruud P. Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives. J. Econometrics (1996) 72(1–2):85–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanemann W. M. Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica (1984) 52(3):541–561Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann W. Intertemporal effects of consumption and their implications for demand elasticity estimates. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2006) 4(4):325–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann W. R., Nair H. S. Retail competition and the dynamics of demand for tied goods. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(2):366–386Link, Google Scholar
• Hartmann W., Nair H. S., Narayanan S. Identifying causal marketing mix effects using a regression discontinuity design. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(6):1079–1097Link, Google Scholar
• Hausman J. A. The econometrics of nonlinear budget sets. Econometrica (1985) 53(6):1255–1282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I. Estimating multiple-discrete choice models: An application to computerization returns. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(2):423–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I., Nevo A. Measuring the implications of sales and consumer inventory behavior. Econometrica (2006) 74(6):1637–1673Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitsch G. J. An empirical model of optimal dynamic product launch and exit under demand uncertainty. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):25–50Link, Google Scholar
• Horsky D. A diffusion model incorporating product benefits, price, income, and information. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(4):342–365Link, Google Scholar
• Horsky D., Nelson P. New brand positioning and pricing in an oligopolistic market. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(2):133–153Link, Google Scholar
• Horsky D., Misra S., Nelson P. Observed and unobserved heterogeneity in brand-choice models. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(4):322–335Link, Google Scholar
• Ishihara M. Dynamic demand for new and used durable goods without physical depreciation: The case of Japanese video games. (2010) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Israilevich G. Assessing supermarket product-line decisions: The impact of slotting fees. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(2):141–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R., Van den Bulte C., Valente T. W. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):195–212Link, Google Scholar
• Keane M. P. A computationally practical simulation estimator for panel data. Econometrica (1994) 62(1):95–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J., Allenby G. M., Rossi P. E. Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(3):229–250Link, Google Scholar
• Kim J., Allenby G. M., Rossi P. E. Product attributes and models of multiple discreteness. J. Econometrics (2007) 138(1):208–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee L.-F., Pitt M. M. Microeconometric demand systems with binding nonnegativity constraints: The dual approach. Econometrica (1986) 54(5):1237–1242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S., Kim J., Allenby G. M. A direct utility model for asymmetric complements. (2010) . Working paper, Ohio State University, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
• Lenk P. J., DeSarbo W. S., Green P. E., Young M. R. Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(2):173–191Link, Google Scholar
• Liu H. Dynamics of pricing in the video game console market: Skimming or penetration? J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(3):428–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J., Hensher D. A., Swait J. D.Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mäler K.-G.Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry (1974) (Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore) Google Scholar
• Mehta N., Chen X., Narsimhan O. Examining demand elasticities in Hanemann's framework: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(3):422–437Link, Google Scholar
• Mela C. F., Gupta S., Lehmann D. R. The long-term impact of promotion and advertising on consumer brand choice. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(2):248–261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melnikov O. Demand for differentiated durable products: The case of the U.S. computer printer market. (2000) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Miller R. A. Job matching and occupational choice. J. Political Econom. (1984) 92(6):1086–1120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misra S. Nonparametric identification in marketing. (2011) . Working paper, Simon School of Business, University of Rochester, Rochester, NYGoogle Scholar
• Misra S., Nair H. S. A structural model of sales-force compensation dynamics: Estimation and field implementation. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2011) 9(3):211–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery A. L., Rossi P. E. Estimating price elasticities with theory-based priors. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(4):413–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morton F. S., Zettelmeyer F., Silva-Risso J. Consumer information and discrimination: Does the Internet affect the pricing of new cars to women and minorities? Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(1):65–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melnikov O. Demand for differentiated durable products: The case of the U.S. computer printer market. (2000) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Nair H. S. Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(3):239–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H. S., Rao A. Dynamics of experience rating: Evidence from automobile insurance contracts. (2010) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Nair H., Dubé J.-P., Chintagunta P. Accounting for primary and secondary demand effects with aggregate data. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):440–460Link, Google Scholar
• Nair H. S., Manchanda P., Bhatia T. Asymmetric social interactions in prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(5):883–895Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nam S., Manchanda P., Chintagunta P. K. The effect of signal quality and contiguous word of mouth on customer acquisition for a video-on-demand service. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(4):690–700Link, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S., Manchanda P. Heterogeneous learning and the targeting of marketing communication for new products. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(3):424–441Link, Google Scholar
• Netessine S., Tang C. S.Consumer-Driven Demand and Operations Management Models (2009) 131(Springer, New York) International Series in Operations Research and Management ScienceGoogle Scholar
• Orhun A. Y. Spatial differentiation in the supermarket industry. (2010) . Working paper, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
• Osborne M. Consumer learning, switching costs, and heterogeneity: A structural examination. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2011) 9(1):25–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels K., Srinivasan S., Franses P. H. When do price thresholds matter in retail categories? Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(1):83–100Link, Google Scholar
• Phaneuf D. J., Smith V. K., Mäler K.-G., Vincent J. R. Recreation demand models. Handbook of Environmental Economics (2005) 2(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 671–762Google Scholar
• Pinkse J., Slade M., Brett C. Spatial price competition: A semiparametric approach. Econometrica (2002) 70(3):1111–1153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratchford B. T. The economics of consumer knowledge. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 27(4):397–411Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reiss P. C., Wolak F. A., Heckman J. J., Leamer E. E. Structural econometric modeling: Rationales and examples from industrial organization. Handbook of Econometrics (2007) 6A(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 4277–4415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi P., Allenby G., McCulloch R.Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy R. La distribution du revenu entre les divers biens. Econometrica (1947) 15(3):205–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan S. P., Tucker C. Heterogeneity and the dynamics of technology adoption. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2011) . ePub ahead of print August 11Google Scholar
• Satomura S., Kim J., Allenby G. M. Multiple-constraint choice models with corner and interior solutions. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(3):481–490Link, Google Scholar
• Seiler S. The impact of search costs on consumer behavior: A dynamic approach. (2010) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Shin S., Misra S., Horsky D. Disentangling preferences and learning in brand choice models. Marketing Sci. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Shriver S. Network effects in alternative fuel adoption: Empirical analysis of the market for ethanol. (2011) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Shiv B., Carmon Z., Ariely D. Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they pay for. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(November):383–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song I., Chintagunta P. K. A micromodel of new product adoption with heterogeneous and forward-looking consumers: Application to the digital camera category. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(4):371–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song I., Chintagunta P. K. A discrete–continuous model for multi-category purchase behavior of households. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):595–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sriram S., Chintagunta P. K., Agarwal M. K. Investigating consumer purchase behavior in related technology product categories. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(2):291–314Link, Google Scholar
• Sun B. Promotion effect on endogenous consumption. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):430–443Link, Google Scholar
• Teixeira T. S., Wedel M., Pieters R. Moment-to-moment optimal branding in TV commercials: Preventing avoidance by pulsing. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(3):783–804Link, Google Scholar
• Thomadsen R. The effect of ownership structure on prices in geographically differentiated industries. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36(4):908–929Google Scholar
• Vilcassim N. J. Extending the Rotterdam model to test hierarchical market structures. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(2):181–190Link, Google Scholar
• von Haefen R. H., Phaneuf D. J., Scarpa R., Alberini A. Kuhn-Tucker demand system approaches to non-market valuation. Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics (2005) (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 135–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wales T., Woodland A. Estimation of consumer demand systems with binding non-negativity constraints. J. Econometrics (1983) 21(3):263–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. W. Flexibility in consumer purchasing for uncertain future tastes. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(2):148–165Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J. The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(2):315–335Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu T., Singh V. Spatial competition with endogenous location choices—An application to discount retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2009) 7(1):1–35Crossref, Google Scholar