Foreword—Revisiting the Workshop on Quantitative Marketing and Structural Econometrics

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0677

References

  • Bass F. M. Empirical generalizations and marketing science: A personal view. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3 Supplement):G6–G19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):841–890CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta P. K., Nair H. S. Discrete-choice models of consumer demand in marketing. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(6):977–996LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dubé J.-P., Fox J. T., Su C.-L. Improving the numerical performance of static and dynamic discrete choice random coefficients demand estimation. (2010) . Working paper, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  • Ellickson P. B., Misra S. Estimating discrete games. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(6):997–1010LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A., Xiao M. Who thinks about the competition? Managerial ability and strategic entry in U.S. local telephone markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magnac T., Thesmar D. Identifying dynamic discrete decision processes. Econometrica (2002) 70(2):801–816CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manski C. F. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):531–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mela C. F. Data selection and procurement. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(6):965–976LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moffitt R. A., Durlauf S. N., Young H. P. Policy interventions, low-level equilibria, and social interactions. Social Dynamics (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 45–82Google Scholar
  • Reiss P. C. Descriptive, structural, and experimental empirical methods in marketing research. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(6):950–964LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rust J., Engle R., McFadden D. Structural estimation of Markov decision processes. Handbook of Econometrics (1994) 4(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 3081–3143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sonquist J. A. Finding variables that work. Public Opinion Quart. (1969) 33(1):83–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Su C.-L., Judd K. L. Constrained optimization approaches to estimation of structural model. (2010) . Working paper, Chicago Booth School of Business, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.