Commentaries and Rejoinder to “Measuring the Impact of Negative Demand Shocks on Car Dealer Networks” by Paulo Albuquerque and Bart J. Bronnenberg

References

• Albuquerque P., Bronnenberg B. J. Measuring the impact of negative demand shocks on car dealer networks. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(1):4–23Link, Google Scholar
• Blattberg R. C., Hoch S. J. Database models and managerial intuition: 50% model + 50% manager. Management Sci. (1990) 36(8):887–899Link, Google Scholar
• Bucklin R. E., Gupta S. Commercial use of scanner data: Industry and academic perspectives. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):247–273Link, Google Scholar
• Dekimpe M. G., Hanssens D. M. The persistence of marketing effects on sales. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar V., Venkatesan R., Reinartz W. Performance implications of adopting a customer-focused sales campaign. J. Marketing (2008) 72(5):50–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leeflang P. S. H., Bijmolt T. H. A., van Doorn J., Hanssens D. M., van Heerde H. J., Verhoef P. C., Wierenga J. E. Creating lift versus building the base: Current trends in marketing dynamics. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2009) 26(1):13–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizik N. The theory and practice of myopic management. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(4):594–611Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels K., Hanssens D. M. Performance regimes and marketing policy shifts. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):293–311Link, Google Scholar
• Pauwels K., Silva-Risso J., Srinivasan S., Hanssens D. M. New products, sales promotions, and firm value: The case of the automobile industry. J. Marketing (2004) 68(4):142–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand W., Rust R. T. Agent-based modeling in marketing: Guidelines for rigor. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2011) 28(3):181–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy A., Hanssens D. M., Raju J. S. Competitive pricing by a price leader. Management Sci. (1994) 40(7):809–823Link, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S., Hanssens D. M. Marketing and firm value: Metrics, methods, findings, and future directions. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(June):293–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Nijs V. R., Hanssens D. M., Dekimpe M. G. Competitive reactions to advertising and promotion attacks. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):35–54Link, Google Scholar
• Albuquerque P., Bronnenberg B. J. Measuring the impact of negative demand shocks on car dealer networks. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(1):4–23Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran S. R., Gilbert S. M. Selling and leasing strategies for durable goods with complementary products. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1278–1290Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran S. R., Gilbert S. M. Implications of channel structure for leasing or selling durable goods. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(5):918–934Link, Google Scholar
• Bruce N., Desai P. S., Staelin R. The better they are, the more they give: Trade promotions of consumer durables. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):54–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruce N., Desai P., Staelin R. Enabling the willing. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(4):350–366Link, Google Scholar
• Bulow J. I. Durable-goods monopolists. J. Political Econom. (1982) 90(2):314–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busse M., Silva-Risso J., Zettelmeyer F. $1000 cash back: The pass-through of auto manufacturer promotions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(4):1253–1270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busse M. R., Simester D. I., Zettelmeyer F. “The best price you'll ever get”: The 2005 employee discount pricing promotions in the U.S. automobile industry. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(2):268–290Link, Google Scholar
• Chien H.-K., Chu C. Y. C. Sale or lease? Durable-goods monopoly with network effects. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(6):1012–1019Link, Google Scholar
• Coase R. H. Durability and monopoly. J. Law Econom. (1972) 15(1):143–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai P., Purohit D. Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11, Part 2):S19–S34Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P. S., Purohit D. Competition in durable goods markets: The strategic consequences of leasing and selling. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(1):42–58Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P. S., Purohit D. “Let me talk to my manager”: Haggling in a competitive environment. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):219–233Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P. S., Koenigsberg O., Purohit D. Forward buying by retailers. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(1):90–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer G. Coordinating channels under price and nonprice competition. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(4):338–355Link, Google Scholar
• Kim J., Rao R. S., Kim K., Rao A. R. More or less: A model and empirical evidence on preferences for under- and overpayment in trade-in transactions. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(1):157–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenigsberg O., Kohli R., Montoya R. The design of durable goods. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(1):111–122Link, Google Scholar
• Lal R., Narasimhan C. The inverse relationship between retailer and manufacturer margins: A theory. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(2):132–151Link, Google Scholar
• Lee E., Staelin R., Yoo W. S., Du R. A “meta” analysis of multi-brand, multi-outlet channel systems. (2010) . Working paper, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NYGoogle Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., Purohit D. Durable goods and product obsolescence. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(1):35–56Link, Google Scholar
• McGuire T. W., Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(2):161–191Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy S. A general theory of pass-through in channels with category management and retail competition. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):110–122Link, Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Consumer assistance to Recycle and Save Act of 2009: Report to Congress. (2009) . Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Okada E. M. Trade-ins, mental accounting, and product replacement decisions. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 27(4):433–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purohit D. Exploring the relationship between the markets for new and used durable goods: The case of automobiles. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(2):154–167Link, Google Scholar
• Purohit D. Playing the role of buyer and seller: The mental accounting of trade-ins. Marketing Lett. (1995) 6(2):101–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purohit D., Staelin R. Rentals, sales and buybacks: Managing secondary distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(4):325–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao R., Shankar V., Carpenter G. S. Models of retail competition. Handbook of Marketing Strategy (2010) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) . Chapter 6Google Scholar
• Rao R. S., Narasimhan O., John G. Understanding the role of trade-ins in durable goods markets: Theory and evidence. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(5):950–967Link, Google Scholar
• Salop S. Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10(1):141–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan R. Innovation and the durable goods monopolist: The optimality of frequent new-version releases. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(6):774–791Link, Google Scholar
• Stokey N. L. Rational expectations and durable goods pricing. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 12(1):112–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M. Durable goods theory for real world markets. J. Econom. Perspect. (2003) 17(1):131–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin S., Ray S., Gurnani H., Animesh A. Durable products with multiple used goods markets: Product upgrade and retail pricing implications. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(3):540–560Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu R., Chen X., Dasgupta S. Can trade-ins hurt you? Exploring the effect of trade-in value on consumers' willingness to pay for the new product. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(2):159–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguirregabiria V., Mira P. Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica (2007) 75(1):1–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty R. Bounds on elasticities with optimization frictions: A synthesis of micro and macro evidence on labor supply. (2011) . NBER Working Paper 15616, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Chintagunta P., Erdem T., Rossi P. E., Wedel M. Structural modeling in marketing: Review and assessment. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):604–616Link, Google Scholar
• Ellickson P. B., Misra S. Enriching interactions: Incorporating outcome data into static discrete games. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2011) . ePub ahead of print September 23Google Scholar
• Gaynor M., Vogt W. B. Competition among hospitals. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34(4):764–785Crossref, Google Scholar
• General Motors GM conducted dealer network analysis to establish the size of a viable dealer network. (2009) . Report, GM, Detroit. http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/WSJGM_062409.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Hanssens D. M. Response models, data sources, and dynamics. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(1):24–27Google Scholar
• Grieco P. L. E. Discrete games with flexible information structures: An application to local grocery markets. (2011) . Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
• Ishii J. Compatibility, competition, and investment in network industries: ATM networks in the banking industry. (2008) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Kadiyali V., Sudhir K., Rao V. R. Structural analysis of competitive behavior: New empirical industrial organization methods in marketing. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2001) 18(1–2):161–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purohit D., Staelin R. A strategic perspective on durable goods. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(1):27–32Google Scholar
• Reiss P., Wolak F., Heckman J. J., Leamer E. E. Structural econometric modeling: Rationales and examples from industrial organization. Handbook of Econometrics (2007) 6A(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 4277–4415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy A., Hanssens D. M., Raju J. S. Competitive pricing by a price leader. Management Sci. (1994) 40(7):809–823Link, Google Scholar
• Thomadesen R. Product positioning and competition: The role of location in the fast food industry. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(6):792–804Link, Google Scholar
• Tucker C. Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. (2008) 55(12):2024–2039Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas S. B. Vertical relationships between manufacturers and retailers: Inference with limited data. Rev. Econom. Studies (2007) 74(2):625–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vlasic B., Bunkley N. Hazardous conditions for the auto industry. New York Times (2008) October 1). http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/02/business/02sales.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Yang S., Allenby G. M. Modeling interdependent consumer preferences. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(3):282–294Crossref, Google Scholar