Commentaries and Rejoinder to “Marketing of Vice Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Package Size Decision” by Sanjay Jain

References

• Chen Y., Iyer G. Consumer addressability and customized pricing. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(2):197–208Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y., Narasiman C., Zhang Z. J. Individual marketing with imperfect targetability. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(1):23–41Link, Google Scholar
• Dogan K., Haruvy E., Rao R. C. Who should practice price discrimination using rebates in an asymmetric duopoly? Quantitative Marketing Econom. (2010) 8(1):61–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain S. Marketing of vice goods: A strategic analysis of the package size decision. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(1):36–51Link, Google Scholar
• Koenigsberg O., Kohli R., Montoya R. Package size decisions. Management Sci. (2010) 56(3):485–494Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar N., Rao R. Using basket composition data for intelligent supermarket pricing. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(2):188–199Link, Google Scholar
• Millenium 3 Chennai CavinKare launches Chinni Krishnan Innovation Awards. (2010) September 10). http://m3chennai.com/2010/09/cavinkare-launches-chinni-krishnan-innovation-awards.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Shaffer G., Zhang Z. J. Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(4):395–416Link, Google Scholar
• Shaffer G., Zhang Z. J. Competitive one-to-one promotions. Management Sci. (2002) 48(9):1143–1160Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M. Communication strategies and product line design. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):304–316Link, Google Scholar
• Chandon P., Ordabayeva N. Supersize in one dimension, downsize in three dimensions: Effects of spatial dimensionality on size perceptions and preferences. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(6):739–753Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandon P., Wansink B. When are stockpiled products consumed faster? A convenience–salience framework of postpurchase consumption incidence and quantity. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(3):321–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandon P., Wansink B. Is food marketing making us fat? A multi-disclipinary view. Foundations Trends Marketing (2011) 5(3):113–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inman J. J. The role of sensory-specific satiety in attribute-level variety seeking. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(1):105–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain S. The marketing of vice goods: A strategic analysis of the package size decision. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(1):36–51Link, Google Scholar
• Just D. R., Wansink B. The flat-rate pricing paradox: Conflicting effects of “all-you-can-eat” buffet pricing”. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2011) 93(1):193–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B. Can package size accelerate usage volume? J. Marketing (1996) 60(3):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B. (Healthy) restaurant confidential. (2012) . Working paper, Cornell Food and Brand Lab, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
• Wansink B., Huckabee M. De-marketing obesity. Calif. Management Rev. (2005) 47(4):6–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B., Payne C. R., Shimizu M. The 100-calorie semi-solution: Sub-packaging most reduces intake among the heaviest. Obesity (2011) 19(5):1098–1100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai P., Mathur S., Srinivasan K. Package sizing in emerging markets. (2008) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
• Dhar R., Simonson I. Making complementary choices in consumption episodes: Highlighting versus balancing. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(1):29–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerstner E., Hess J. D. Why do hot dogs come in packs of 10 and buns in 8s or 12s? A demand-side investigation. J. Bus. (1987) 60(4):491–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenisberg O., Kohli R., Montoya R. Package size decisions. Management Sci. (2010) 56(3):485–494Link, Google Scholar
• Rao R. Package size and competition. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(1):52–54Google Scholar
• Wansink B. Package size, portion size, serving size … market size: The unconventional case for half-size servings. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(1):54–57Google Scholar