A Conjoint Model of Quantity Discounts

References

• Allenby G. M., Shively T. S., Yang S., Garratt M. J. A choice model for packaged goods: Dealing with discrete quantities and quantity discounts. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):95–108Link, Google Scholar
• Baucells M., Sarin R. K. Satiation in discounted utility. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(1):170–181Link, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S. R.Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (1985) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Chung J., Rao V. R. A general choice model for bundles with multiple-category products: Application to market segmentation and optimal pricing for bundles. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(2):115–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding M., Grewal R., Liechty J. Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):67–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dolan R. J., Simon H.Power Pricing: How Managing Price Transforms the Bottom Line (1997) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Gelman A., Hill J.Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (2007) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A., Rubin D. B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statist. Sci. (1992) 7(4):457–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerstner E., Hess J. D. Why do hot dogs come in packs of 10 and buns in 8s and 12s? A demand-side investigation. J. Bus. (1987) 60(4):491–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon B., Sun B. A dynamic structural model of addiction, promotions, and permanent price cuts. (2010) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Green P. E., Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J. Marketing (1990) 54(4):3–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haab T. C., McConnell K. E. Referendum models and economic values: Theoretical, intuitive, and practical bounds on willingness to pay. Land Econom. (1998) 74(2):216–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haaijer M. E., Kamakura W. A., Wedel M. The “no-choice” alternative in conjoint choice experiments. Internat. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 43(1):93–106Google Scholar
• Huber J., Zwerina K. The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(3):307–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R., Jedidi K., Kohli R. A conjoint approach to multi-part pricing. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(2):195–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jedidi K., Zhang Z. J. Augmenting conjoint analysis to estimate consumer reservation price. Management Sci. (2002) 48(10):1350–1368Link, Google Scholar
• Jedidi K., Jagpal S., Manchanda P. Measuring heterogeneous reservation prices for product bundles. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):107–130Link, Google Scholar
• Kass R. E., Raftery A. E. Bayes factors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90(430):773–795Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J., Allenby G. M., Rossi P. E. Volumetric conjoint analysis. (2004) . Working paper, Ohio State University, ColumbusCrossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Mahajan V. A reservation-price model for optimal pricing of multiattribute products in conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(3):347–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A., Seim K., Skiera B. Does uncertainty matter? Consumer behavior under three-part tariffs. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(5):698–710Link, Google Scholar
• Miller K. M., Hofstetter R., Krohmer H., Zhang Z. J. How should we measure consumers' willingness to pay? An empirical comparison of state-of-the-art approaches. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(1):172–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitra S. Netflix leads video market forward. Sramana Mitra (blog) (2009) October 28). http://www.sramanamitra.com/2009/10/28/netflix-leads-video-market-forwardGoogle Scholar
• Montoya R., Netzer O., Jedidi K. Dynamic allocation of pharmaceutical detailing and sampling for long-term profitability. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(5):909–924Link, Google Scholar
• Netflix Netflix annual report. (2008) . Report, Netflix, Los Gatos, CA. http://ir.netflix.com/annuals.cfmGoogle Scholar
• Nevo A. A practitioner's guide to estimation of random-coefficients logit models of demand. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2000) 9(4):513–548Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park Y.-H., Ding M., Rao V. R. Eliciting preference for complex products: A Web-based upgrading method. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(5):562–574Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao V. R. Pricing research in marketing: The state of the art. J. Bus. (1984) 57(1):S39–S60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao V. R., Sattler H., Gustaffsson A., Herrmann A., Huber F. Measurement of price effects with conjoint analysis: Separating informational and allocative effects of price. Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications (2003) (Springer, Berlin) 47–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Redden J. P. Reducing satiation: The role of categorization level. J. Consumer Res. (2008) 34(5):624–634Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reisinger D. Netflix's Blu-ray pricing: A boon for Blockbuster? (2009) . CNET (April 1) http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-10208093-17.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Schlereth C., Stepanchuk T., Skiera B. Optimization and analysis of the profitability of tariff structures with two part tariffs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2010) 206(3):691–701Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Implicit understandings in channels of distribution. Management Sci. (1985) 31(4):435–460Link, Google Scholar
• Sonnier G., Ainslie A., Otter T. The effects of parameterization on heterogeneous choice models. (2007) . Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
• Sudhir K. Competitive pricing behavior in the auto market: A structural analysis. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(1):42–60Link, Google Scholar
• Wang T., Venkatesh R., Chatterjee R. Reservation price as a range: An incentive-compatible measurement approach. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(2):200–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westerterp-Plantenga M. S., Verwegen C. R. T. The appetizing effect of an apéritif in overweight and normal-weight humans. Amer. J. Clinical Nutrition (1999) 69(2):205–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson R.Nonlinear Pricing (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar