Procuring Commodities: First-Price Sealed-Bid or English Auctions?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0704

References

  • Abbas A. E., Hann I.-H. Measuring risk aversion in a name-your-own-price channel. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):123–136LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armantier O., Treich N. Star-shaped probability weighting functions and overbidding in first-price auctions. Econom. Lett. (2009a) 104(2):83–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armantier O., Treich N. Subjective probabilities in games: An application to the overbidding puzzle. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2009b) 50(4):1079–1102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P., Hortacsu A. Are structural estimates of auction models reasonable? Evidence from experimental data. J. Political Econom. (2005) 113(4):703–741CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett G. F., Donald S. G. Consistent tests for stochastic dominance. Econometrica (2003) 71(1):71–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berg J., Dickhaut J., McCabe K. Risk preference instability across institutions: A dilemma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2005) 102(11):4209–4214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradlow E. T., Park Y.-H. Bayesian estimation of bid sequences in Internet auctions using a generalized record-breaking model. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):218–229LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J., Hossain T., Morgan J. Shrouded attributes and information suppression: Evidence from the field. Quart. J. Econom. (2010) 125(2):859–876CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F., Ho T.-H. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica (1999) 67(4):827–874CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cantillon E. The effect of bidders' asymmetries on expected revenue in auctions. Games Econom. Behav. (2008) 61(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chafkin M. Reverse auctions: A supplier's survival guide. Inc. (2007) April 25). http://inc.com/inctr/2007/04/reverse-auctions-a-suppliers-survival-guide.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Chan T. Y., Kadiyali V., Park Y.-H. Willingness to pay and competition in online auctions. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(2):324–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen K.-Y., Plott C. R. Nonlinear behavior in sealed bid first price auctions. Games Econom. Behav. (1998) 25(1):34–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen-Ritzo C.-H., Harrison T. P., Kwasnica A. M., Thomas D. J. Better, faster, cheaper: An experimental analysis of a multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback. Management Sci. (2005) 51(12):1753–1762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coppinger V. M., Smith V. L., Titus J. A. Incentives and behavior in English, Dutch, and sealed-bid auctions. Econom. Inquiry (1980) 18(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox J., Oaxaca R. L., Issac R. M. Is bidding behavior consistent with bidding theory for private value auctions? Research in Experimental Economics (1996) Vol. 6(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 131–148Google Scholar
  • Cox J. C., Roberson B., Smith V. L., Smith V. L. Theory and behavior of single object auctions. Research in Experimental Economics (1982) Vol. 2(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 537–579Google Scholar
  • Crawford V. P., Iriberri N. Level-k auctions: Can a nonequilibrium model of strategic thinking explain the winner's curse and overbidding in private-value auctions? Econometrica (2007) 75(6):1721–1770CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dholakia U. M., Simonson I. The effect of explicit reference points on consumer choice and online bidding behavior. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):206–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dittrich D. A. V., Guth W., Kocher M., Pezanis-Christou P. Loss aversion and learning to bid. Economica (2011) . ePub ahead of print August 18Google Scholar
  • Elmaghraby W. Auctions within e-sourcing events. Production Oper. Management (2007) 16(4):409–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., Katok E. Regret in auctions: Theory and evidence. Econom. Theory (2007) 33(1):81–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., Katok E. Regret and feedback information in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):808–819LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fay S. Partial-repeat-bidding in the name-your-own-price channel. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):407–418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Filiz-Ozbay E., Ozbay E. Y. Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(4):1407–1418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree J., Holt C. A., Palfrey T. R. Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 104(1):247–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guerre E., Perrigne I., Vuong Q. Nonparametric identification of risk aversion in first-price auctions under exclusion restrictions. Econometrica (2009) 77(4):1193–1227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guth W., Ivanova-Stenzel R., Konigstein M., Strobel M. Learning to bid—An experimental study of bid function adjustments in auctions and fair division games. Econom. J. (2003) 113(487):477–494Google Scholar
  • Haruvy E., Katok E. An experimental investigation of buyer determined procurement auctions. (2008) . Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
  • Hendricks K., Porter R. H. An empirical study of an auction with asymmetric information. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78(5):865–883Google Scholar
  • Holt C. A. Competitive bidding for contracts under alternative auction procedures. J. Political Econom. (1980) 88(3):433–445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hossain T., Morgan J. …Plus shipping and handling: Revenue (non) equivalence in field experiments on eBay. B. E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy (2006) 6(2). http://works.bepress.com/john_morgan/1Google Scholar
  • Hui S. K., Fader P. S., Bradlow E. T. Path data in marketing: An integrative framework and prospectus for model building. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(2):320–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • James D., Reagle D., Anderssen R. S., Braddock R. D., Newham L. T. H. Experience weighted attraction in the first price auction and Becker Degroot Marschak. 18th World IMACS Congress MODSIM09 Internat. Congress Modelling Simulation (2009) (Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand and International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation)1437–1441Google Scholar
  • Jap S. D. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2002) 30(4):506–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D. The impact of online reverse auction design on buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing (2007) 71(1):146–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D., Haruvy E. Interorganizational relationships and bidding behavior in industrial online reverse auctions. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(5):550–561CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D., Naik P. A. BidAnalyzer: A method for estimation and selection of dynamic bidding models. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(6):949–960LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kagel J. H., Kagel J. H., Roth A. E. Auctions: A survey of experimental research. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 501–586CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kagel J. H., Levin D. Independent private value auctions: Bidder behavior in first-, second-, and third-price auctions with varying numbers of bidders. Econom. J. (1993) 103(419):868–879Google Scholar
  • Kagel J. H., Levin D., Durlauf S. N., Blume L. E. Auctions: Experiments. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2008) 2nd ed.(Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) . DOI:10.1087/9780230226203.0072CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kagel J. H., Levin D., Kagel J. H., Roth A. E. Auctions: A survey of experimental research 1995–2008. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (2012) Vol. 2(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Kirchkamp O., Reiss J. P. Heterogeneous bids in auctions with rational and markdown bidders—Theory and experiment. (2008) . Jena Economic Research Paper 2008-066, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Max-Planck-Institute of Economics, Jena, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Krasnokutskaya E. Identification and estimation of auction models with unobserved heterogeneity. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2011) 78(1):293–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna V.Auction Theory (2002) (Academic Press, London) Google Scholar
  • Laffont J.-J., Ossard H., Vuong Q. Econometrics of first-price auctions. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):953–980CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy H. Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis. Management Sci. (1992) 38(4):555–593LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lucking-Reiley D. Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the Internet. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(5):1063–1080CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maskin E. S., Riley J. G. Asymmetric auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2000) 67(3):413–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan J., Steiglitz K., Reis G. The spite motive and equilibrium behavior in auctions. B. E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy (2003) 2(1). Article 5Google Scholar
  • Myerson R. B. Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. (1981) 6(1):58–73LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Netzer O., Lattin J. M., Srinivasan V. A hidden Markov model of customer relationship dynamics. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(2):185–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Neugebauer T., Perote J. Bidding “as if” risk neutral in experimental first price auctions without information feedback. Experiment. Econom. (2008) 11(2):190–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neugebauer T., Selten R. Individual behavior of first-price auctions: The importance of information feedback in computerized experimental markets. Games Econom. Behav. (2006) 54(1):183–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ockenfels A., Selten R. Impulse balance equilibrium and feedback in first price auctions. Games Econom. Behav. (2005) 51(1):155–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park Y.-H., Bradlow E. T. An integrated model for bidding behavior in Internet auctions: Whether, who, when, and how much. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(4):470–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parkes D. C., Kalagnanam J. Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):435–451LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Purchasing E-auction playbook. (2001) June 21):S1–S3Google Scholar
  • Rabiner L. R. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE (1989) 77(2):257–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Selten R., Buchta J., Budescu D. V., Erev I., Zwick R. Experimental sealed bid first price auctions with directly observed bid functions. Games and Human Behavior: Essays in Honor of Amon Rapoport (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 79–102Google Scholar
  • Seshadri S., Chatterjee K., Lilien G. L. Multiple source procurement competitions. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(3):246–263LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shachat J., Swarthout J. T. Procurement auctions for differentiated goods. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):6–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance (1961) 16(1):8–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yao S., Mela C. F. Online auction demand. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(5):861–885LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithammer R., Adams C. The sealed-bid abstraction in online auctions. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(6):964–987LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.