Social Sharing of Information Goods: Implications for Pricing and Profits

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0706

References

  • Andrade N, Mowbray M, Lima A, Wagner G, Ripeanu M. Influences on cooperation in bittorrent communities. Proc. 2005 ACM SIGCOMM Workshop Econom. Peer-to-Peer Systems (2005) (ACM, New York) 111–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagnoli M, McKee M. Voluntary contribution games: Efficient private provision of public goods. Econom. Inquiry (1991) 29(2):351–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker WE, Faulkner RR. The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1993) 58(6):837–860CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E, Lichtman D. Shared information goods. J. Law Econom. (1999) 42(1):117–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bala V, Goyal S. A non-cooperative model of network formation. Econometrica (2000) 68(5):1181–1231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Sanders GL. Digital music and online sharing: Software piracy 2.0? Comm. ACM (2003) 46(7):107–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D, Butterfield K, Skaggs B. Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(1):14–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton-Taylor International Consulting Global financial information survey—Revenue, sharing, and piracy estimates. (2009) . Report, Burton-Taylor International Consulting, Osprey, FLGoogle Scholar
  • Business Software Alliance Fourth annual BSA and IDC global software piracy study. (2008) . Report, BSA, Washington, DC. http://global.bsa.org/idcglobalstudy2007/studies/2006globalpiracystudy-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng H, Sims R, Teegen H. To purchase or pirate software: An empirical study. J. Management Inform. Systems (1997) 13(4):49–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke EH. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice (1971) 11(1):17–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conner KR, Rumelt RP. Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Sci. (1991) 37(2):125–139LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R. Theories of commitment, altruism, and reciprocity: Evidence from linear public goods games. Econom. Inquiry (2007) 42(2):199–216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes RM, McTacvish J, Shaklee H. Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1977) 35(1):1–11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dearden J, Einolf K. Strategy-proof allocation of fixed costs. Rev. Econom. Design (2003) 8(July):185–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deroian F. Endogenous link strength in directed communication networks. Math. Soc. Sci. (2009) 57(1):110–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P, Purohit D, Vernik D. Music downloads and the flip side of digital rights management. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(6):1011–1027LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erdös P, Rényi A. On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hungarian Acad. Sci. (1960) 5:17–61Google Scholar
  • Falk A, Kosfield M. It's all about connections: Evidence on network formation. (2003) . Working paper, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Feri F. Stochastic stability in networks with decay. J. Econom. Theory (2007) 135(1):442–457CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gachter EFS. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(4):980–994CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Girvan M, Newman MEJ. Community and structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2002) 99(12):7821–7826CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Givon M, Mahajan V, Muller E. Software piracy: Estimation of lost sales and the impact of software diffusion. J. Marketing (1995) 59(1):29–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree J, Riedl A, Ule A. In search of stars: Network formation among heterogeneous agents. Games Econom. Behav. (2009) 67(2):445–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gopal RD, Sanders GL. Software piracy: Key issues and impacts. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(4):380–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gopal RD, Bhattacharjee S, Sanders GL. Do artists benefit from online music sharing? J. Bus. (2006) 79(3):1503–1533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herman M. FT sues Blackstone over alleged login abuse. Free Republic (2009) February 2). http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2177242/postsGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes D, Coulson G, Walkerdine J. Free riding on Gnutella revisited: The bell tolls? IEEE Distributed Systems Online (2005) 6(6):1DOI:10.1109/MDSO.2005.31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hwang S, Lee H, Cho S. Account-sharing detection through keystroke dynamics analysis. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2009) 14(2):109–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson MO, Wolinsky A. A strategic model of social and economic networks. J. Econom. Theory (1996) 71(1):44–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain S. Digital piracy: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. (2008) 28(3):610–626LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karp RM, Miller RE, Thatcher JW. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. Complexity of Computer Computations (1972) (Plenum, New York) 85–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar R, Novak J, Tomkins A, Yu PSS, Han J, Faloutsos C. Structure and evolution of online social networks. Link Mining: Models, Algorithms, and Applications (2010) (Springer, New York) 337–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarsfeld P, Merton R, Berger M, Abel T, Page C. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (1954) (Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ) 18–66Google Scholar
  • Ledyard J, Kagel J, Roth A. Public goods: A survey of experimental research. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 111–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levati MV, Sutter M, van der Heijden E. Leading by example in a public goods experiment with heterogeneity and incomplete information. J. Conflict Resolution (2007) 51(5):793–818CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liebowitz SJ. Copying and indirect appropriability: Photocopying of journals. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93(5):945–957CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2001) 27(1):415–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Messmer E. Realtors sold on software that ferrets out illicit password sharing. Network World (2009) March 3). http://networkworld.com/news/2009/030309-realtors-database-password.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Mortimer J. Price discrimination, copyright law, and technological innovation: Evidence from the introduction of DVDs. Quart. J. Econom. (2007) 122(3):1307–1350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MusicAlly.com Napster users sharing passwords to save cash. Register (2005) April 8). http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/08/napster_password_sharing/Google Scholar
  • Newman MEJ. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2001) 98(2):404–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman MEJ, Bornholdt S, Schuster HG. Random graphs as models of networks. Handbook of Graphs and Networks (2003) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 35–68Google Scholar
  • Newman MEJ, Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Random graph models of social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2002) 99(Suppl 1):2566–2572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norman P. Efficient mechanisms for public goods with use exclusions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2004) 71(4):1163–1188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ordover JA, Willig RD. On the optimal provision of journals qua sometimes shared goods. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1978) 68(3):324–338Google Scholar
  • Ostrom E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(3):137–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peitz M, Waelbroeck P. Piracy of digital products: A critical review of the theoretical literature. Inform. Econom. Policy (2006) 18(4):449–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pritchard S. Money: On-line tip sheets: The penny hasn't dropped. Independent (1998) March 22). http://www.independent.co.uk/news/a1151732.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Romenesko J. Online publishers try to end password abuse. Philadelphia Inquirer (1997) June 1):D03Google Scholar
  • Shy O, Thisse J. A strategic approach to software protection. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1999) 8(2):163–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sinha RK, Mandel N. Preventing digital music piracy: The carrot or the stick? J. Marketing (2008) 72(1):1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith E, Fowler GA. Ganging up on Internet pirates. Wall Street Journal (2011) July 8). http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303365804576432270822271148.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Sonnier G, Ainslie A, Otter T. Heterogeneity distributions of willingness-to-pay in choice models. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(3):313–331CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stubblefield AB, Wallach DS. A security analysis of my.mp3.com and the beam-it protocol. (2000) . Technical Report TR-00-353, Rice University, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  • Van Vugt M, De Cremer D. Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1999) 76(4):587–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR. Buying, sharing, and renting information goods. J. Indust. Econom. (2000) 48(4):473–488CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR. Copying and copyright. J. Econom. Perspect. (2005) 19(2):121–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson T. Widespread account-sharing threatens corporate security, revenues. Dark Reading (2008) Novemebr 13). http://www.darkreading.com/security/client-security/212002459/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.