Network Traces on Penetration: Uncovering Degree Distribution from Adoption Data

References

• Albert R, Barabási AL. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Modern Phys. (2002) 74(January):47–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amaral LAN, Scala A, Barthelemy M, Stanley HE. Classes of small-world networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2000) 97(21):11149–11152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barabási AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1999) 286(5439):509–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass FM. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(5):215–227Link, Google Scholar
• Bemmaor AC, Laurent G, Lilien GL. Modeling the diffusion of new durable goods: Word-of-mouth effect versus consumer heterogeneity. Research Traditions in Marketing (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) 221–229Google Scholar
• Bemmaor AC, Lee J. The impact of heterogeneity and ill-conditioning on diffusion model parameter estimates. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(2):209–220Link, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Schwartz EM. What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(5):869–880Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun M, Bonfrer A. Scalable inference of customer similarities from interactions data using Dirichlet processes. Marketing Sci. (2010) 30(3):513–531Link, Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran D, Tellis GJ, Malhotra NK. A critical review of marketing research on diffusion of new products. Review of Marketing (2007) (M.E. Sharpe, New York) 39–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Easingwood C, Mahajan V, Muller E. A non-uniform influence innovation diffusion model of new product acceptance. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):273–295Link, Google Scholar
• Ebbes P, Huang Z, Rangaswamy A. Subgraph sampling methods for social networks: The good, the bad, and the ugly. (2010) . Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
• Erdös P, Rényi A. On random graphs I. Publ. Math. Debrecen (1959) 6:290–297Google Scholar
• Farley JU, Lehmann DR, Sawyer A. Empirical marketing generalization using meta-analysis. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3, Supplement):G36–G46Link, Google Scholar
• Garber T, Goldenberg J, Libai B, Muller E. From density to destiny: Using spatial dimension of sales data for early prediction of new product success. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):419–428Link, Google Scholar
• Garlaschelli D, Loffredo MI. Maximum likelihood: Extracting unbiased information from complex networks. Phys. Rev. E (2008) 78(1):015101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J, Lowengart O, Shapira D. Integrating the social network to diffusion model and evaluation of the value of hubs in the adoption process. (2009a) . Working paper, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, IsraelCrossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J, Han S, Lehmann DR, Hong JW. The role of hubs in the adoption process. J. Marketing (2009b) 73(2):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomez S, Jensen P, Arenas A. Analysis of community structure in networks of correlated data. Phys. Rev. E (2009) 80:016114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Mela CF, Vidal-Sanz JM. The value of a “free” customer. (2006) . Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Hill S, Provost F, Volinsky C. Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Statist. Sci. (2006) 22(2):256–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinz O, Skiera B, Barrot C, Becker JU. Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. J. Marketing (2011) 75(6):55–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):195–212Link, Google Scholar
• Jedidi K, Jagpal HS, Desarbo WS. Finite mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(1):39–59Link, Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Sarvary M. Network formation and the structure of the commercial worldwide Web. Marketing Sci. (2009) 27(5):764–778Link, Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Zubcsek P, Sarvary M. Network effects and personal influences: Diffusion of an online social network. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(3):425–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz E, Lazarsfeld PF. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications (1955) (Transaction Publishers, Glencoe, IL) Google Scholar
• Kullback S. Information Theory and Statistics. Books on Mathematics (1997) (Dover, New York) Google Scholar
• Libai B, Muller E, Peres R. Sources of social value in word-of-mouth programs. (2010) . MSI Reports 10-103, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Liben-Nowell D, Kleinberg J. Tracing information flow on a global scale using Internet chain-letter data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2008) 105(12):4633–4638Crossref, Google Scholar
• Limpert E, Stahel WA, Abbt M. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: Keys and clues. Bioscience (2001) 51(5):341–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D. The influence of social networks on the effectiveness of promotional strategies. (2002) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Mislove A, Marcon M, Gummadi KP, Druschel P, Bhattacharjee B. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. Proc. 5th ACM/USENIX Internet Measurement Conf. (2007) (ACM, New York) 29–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Fader PS. Modeling hedonic portfolio products: A joint segmentation analysis of music compact disc sales. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(3):376–385Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemp. Phys. (2005) 46(5):323–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ, Barabási AL, Watts DJ. The Structure and Dynamics of Networks (2006) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ, Forrest S, Balthrop J. Email networks and the spread of computer viruses. Phys. Rev. E (2002) 66:035101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennock DM, Flake GW, Lawrence S, Glover EJ, Giles CL. Winners don't take all: Characterizing the competition for links on the Web. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2002) 99(8):5207–5211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramasco JJ, Mungan M. Inversion method for content-based networks. Phys. Rev. E (2008) 77(3):12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaikh NI, Rangaswamy A, Balakrishnan A. Modeling the diffusion of innovations through small-world networks. (2006) . Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
• Stephen AT, Toubia O. Deriving value from social commerce networks. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(2):215–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stumpf MPH, Wiuf C, May RM. Subnets of scale-free networks are not scale-free: Sampling properties of networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2005) 102(12):4221–4224Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stutzbach D, Rejaie R. Capturing accurate snapshots of the Gnutella network. Proc. IEEE Global Internet Symp. (2005) Miami, FL:2825–2830Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trusov M, Rand W. Identifying network properties from aggregate data. (2011) . Working paper, University of Maryland, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Iyengar R. Tricked by truncation: Spurious duration dependence and social contagion in hazard models. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):233–248Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Joshi YV. New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):400–421Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien GL. Bias and systematic change in the parameter estimates of macro-level diffusion models. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(4):338–353Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Wuyts S. Social Networks and Marketing (2007) (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Volz E. Random networks with tunable degree distribution and clustering. Phys. Rev. E (2004) 70:056115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Dodds PS. Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34(4):441–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature (1998) 393(6684):440–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeung Y-Y. Macroscopic study of the social networks formed in Web-based discussion forums. Proc. 2005 Conf. Comput. Support Collaborative Learning—Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! (2005) (International Society of the Learning Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan) 727–731Crossref, Google Scholar