Periodic Advertising Pulsing in a Competitive Market

References

• Bronnenberg BJ. Advertising frequency decisions in a discrete Markov process under a budget constraint. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):399–406Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Kruger M, Mela C. The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(4):745–748Link, Google Scholar
• Che H, Sudhir K, Seetharaman PB. Bounded rationality in pricing under state-dependent demand: Do firms look ahead, and if so, how far? J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(3):434–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Vilcassim NJ. An empirical investigation of advertising strategies in a dynamic duopoly. Management Sci. (1992) 38(9):1230–1244Link, Google Scholar
• Clarke DG. Econometric measurement of the duration of advertising effects on sales. J. Marketing Res. (1976) 13(4):345–387Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deal KR. Optimizing advertising expenditures in a dynamic duopoly. Oper. Res. (1979) 27(4):682–692Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch G, Manchanda P. An empirical model of advertising dynamics. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2005) 3(2):107–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE. State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. (2010) 41(3):417–445Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erickson GM. A model of advertising competition. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(3):297–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feichtinger G, Hartl RF, Sethi SP. Dynamic optimal control models in advertising: Recent developments. Management Sci. (1994) 40(2):195–226Link, Google Scholar
• Feinberg FM. Pulsing policies for aggregate advertising models. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(3):221–234Link, Google Scholar
• Feinberg FM. On continuous-time optimal advertising under S-shaped response. Management Sci. (2001) 47(11):1476–1487Link, Google Scholar
• Freimer M, Horsky D. Try it you will like it—Does consumer learning lead to competitive price promotions? Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(5):796–810Link, Google Scholar
• Fruchter GE, Kalish S. Closed-loop advertising strategies in a duopoly. Management Sci. (1997) 43(1):54–63Link, Google Scholar
• Givon M, Horsky D. Untangling the effects of purchase reinforcement and advertising carryover. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(2):171–187Link, Google Scholar
• Hanssens DM, Parsons LJ, Shultz RL. Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis (1990) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC, Bicchieri C, Chiara MD. Game solutions and the normal form. Knowledge, Belief, and Strategic Interaction (1992) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 355–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horsky D. An empirical analysis of the optimal advertising policy. Management Sci. (1977) 23(10):1037–1049Link, Google Scholar
• Horsky D, Misra S, Nelson P. Observed and unobserved preference heterogeneity in brand-choice models. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(4):322–355Link, Google Scholar
• Kimball GE. Some industrial applications of military operations research methods. Oper. Res. (1957) 5(2):201–204Link, Google Scholar
• Little JDC. Aggregate advertising models: The state of the art. Oper. Res. (1979) 27(4):629–667Link, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V, Muller E. Advertising pulsing policies for generating awareness for new products. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5(2):89–106Link, Google Scholar
• Park S, Hahn M. Pulsing in a discrete model of advertising competition. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(4):397–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman PB. Modeling multiple sources of state dependence in random utility models: A distributed lag approach. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):263–271Link, Google Scholar
• Vidale ML, Wolfe HB. An operations-research study of sales response to advertising. Oper. Res. (1957) 5(3):370–381Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM. Predicting advertising pulsing policies in an oligopoly: A model and empirical test. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(1):88–102Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas SB, Villas-Boas JM. Learning, forgetting, and sales. Management Sci. (2008) 54(1):1951–1960Link, Google Scholar