Investigating the Drivers of Consumer Cross-Category Learning for New Products Using Multiple Data Sets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0717

References

  • Aertsens J, Mondelaers K, Verbeke W, Buysse J, Van Huylenbroeck G. The influence of subjective and objective knowledge on attitude, motivations, and consumption of organic food. British Food J. (2011) 113(11):1353–1378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ailawadi KL, Gedenk K, Lutzky C, Neslin SA. Decomposition of the sales impact of promotion-induced stockpiling. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(3):450–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ainslie A, Rossi PE. Similarities in choice behavior across product categories. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):91–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Akçura MT, Gönül FF, Petrova E. Consumer learning and brand valuation: An application on over-the-counter drugs. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):156–169LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Assunção JL, Meyer RJ. The rational effect of price promotions on sales and consumption. Management Sci. (1993) 39(5):517–535LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balasubramanian SK, Cole C. Consumers' search and use of nutrition information: The challenge and promise of the nutrition labeling and education act. J. Marketing (2002) 66(3):112–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bearden WO, Etzel MJ. Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(2):183–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR. Discrete Choice Analysis (1985) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Berger J, Sorensen AT, Rasmussen SJ. Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(5):815–827LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernard JC, Bernard DJ. What is it about organic milk? An experimental analysis. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (2009) 91(3):826–836CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bittman M. Eating food that's better for you, organic or not. New York Times (2009) March 21). http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/22/weekinreview/22bittman.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton RN, Lemon KN. A dynamic model of customers' usage of services: Usage as an antecedent and consequence of satisfaction. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(2):171–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borle S, Boatwright P, Kadane JB, Nunes JC, Shmueli G. The effect of product assortment changes on customer retention. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):616–622LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bourn D, Prescott J. A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Critical Rev. Food Sci. Nutrition (2002) 42(1):1–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg BJ, Mela CF. Market roll-out and retailer adoption for new brands. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):500–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin RE, Lattin JM. A two-state model of purchase incidence and brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(1):24–39LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin RE, Gupta S, Siddarth SS. Determining segmentation in sales response across consumer purchase behaviors. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(2):189–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byzalov D, Shachar R. The risk reduction role of advertising. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(4):283–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cahill S, Morley K, Powell DA. Coverage of organic agriculture in North American newspapers: Media: Linking food safety, the environment, human health, and organic agriculture. British Food J. (2010) 112(7):710–722CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandrasekaran D, Tellis GJ. Global takeoff of new products: Culture, wealth, or vanishing differences? Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(5):844–860LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Charles G. ‘Buzz’ finds favour in the UK. Marketing (2008) 2(February 27):5Google Scholar
  • Chen Y, Yang S, Zhao Y. A simultaneous model of consumer brand choice and negotiated price. Management Sci. (2008) 54(3):538–549LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ching AT. Consumer learning and heterogeneity: Dynamics of demand for prescription drugs after patent expiration. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2010) 28(6):619–638CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching AT, Erdem T, Keane M. The price consideration model of brand choice. J. Appl. Econometrics (2009) 24(3):240–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta PK, Jiang R, Jin GZ. Information, learning, and drug diffusion: The case of Cox-2 inhibitors. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2009) 7(4):399–443CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coscelli A, Shum M. An empirical model of learning and patient spillovers in new drug entry. J. Econometrics (2004) 122(2):213–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cui L. Growing naturally in Alabama: Needs and possibilities. (2008) . Master's thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, ALGoogle Scholar
  • Demerrit L. Organic pathways. [N]Sight (2004) Fall):16–21Google Scholar
  • Dimitri C, Oberholtzer L. Marketing U.S. organic foods. (2009) . Recent trends from farms to consumers. Economic Information Bulletin 58, ERS/USDA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Eiser JR, Coulson NS, Eiser C. Adolescents' perceptions of the costs and benefits of food additives and their presence in different foods. J. Risk Res. (2002) 5(2):167–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enis M. Organic growth. Supermarket News (2010) 58(30):19–20Google Scholar
  • Erdem T, Keane MP. Decision making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):1–20LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T, Keane MP, Öncü TS, Strebel J. Learning about computers: An analysis of information search and technology choice. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2005) 3(3):207–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferreyra MM, Kosenok G. Learning about new products: An empirical study of physicians' behavior. Econom. Inquiry (2011) 49(3):876–898CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Folkes VS, Martin IM, Gupta K. When to say when: Effects of supply on usage. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(3):467–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon H, Robertson TS. Integration of consumer diffusion theory and diffusion models. Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance (1986) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 37–59Google Scholar
  • Gielens K, Steenkamp JEM. Drivers of consumer acceptance of new packaged goods: An investigation across products and countries. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2007) 24(2):97–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grayson K, Radan M. Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(2):296–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen K, Singh V, Chintagunta P. Understanding store brand purchase behavior across categories. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):75–90LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J, Tellis GJ, Griffin A. Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):687–717LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hjelmar U. Consumers' purchase of organic food products. A matter of convenience and reflexive practices. Appetite (2009) 56(2):336–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horsky D. A diffusion model incorporating product benefits, price, income, and information. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(4):342–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hui SK, Fader PS, Bradlow ET. Path data in marketing: An integrative framework and prospectus for model building. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(2):320–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Im S, Bayus BL, Mason CH. An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior. J. Acad. Marketing. Sci. (2003) 31(1):61–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (2007) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Kalra A, Li S. Signaling quality through specialization. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(2):168–184LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kluger J. What's so great about organic food? Time (2010) 176(9):30–40Google Scholar
  • Krystallis A, Chryssohoidis G. Consumers' willingness to pay for organic food: Factors that affect it and variation per organic product type. British Food J. (2005) 107(5):320–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J. Applied Linear Regression Models (2004) 4th ed.(McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lusk JL, Briggeman BC. Food values. Amer. J. Agricultural Economics (2009) 91(1):184–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P, Ansari A, Gupta S. The “shopping basket”: A model for multicategory purchase incidence decisions. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(2):95–114LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta N. Investigating consumers' purchase incidence and brand choice decisions across multiple product categories: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):196–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Menard S. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Mitra D, Golder PN. Whose culture matters? Near-market knowledge and its impact on foreign market entry timing. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(3):350–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mogelonsky M. Organic food and drink. Prepared Foods (2008) 177(4):21–26Google Scholar
  • Niraj R, Padmanabhan V, Seetharaman PB. A cross-category model of households' incidence and quantity decisions. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(2):225–235LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Organic Trade Association Organic industry survey. (2010) . Report, Organic Trade Association, Brattleboro, VTGoogle Scholar
  • Padel S, Foster C. Exploring the gap between attitudes and behavior: Understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. British Food J. (2005) 107(8):606–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pauwels K, Srinivasan S. Who benefits from store brand entry? Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):364–390LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Peres R, Muller E, Mahajan V. Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2010) 27(2):91–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silva-Risso J, Ionova I. A nested logit model of product and transaction-type choice for planning automakers' pricing and promotions. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(4):545–566LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh VP, Hansen K, Gupta S. Modeling preferences for common attributes in multicategory brand choice. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(2):195–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A, MacKinnon JB. The 100-Mile Diet: A Year of Local Eating (2007) (Vintage Canada, Toronto) Google Scholar
  • Swait J, Andrews RL. Enriching scanner panel methods with choice experiments. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):442–460LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson SA, Sinha RK. Brand communities and new product adoption: The influence and limits of oppositional loyalty. J. Marketing (2008) 72(6):65–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tondel F, Woods T. Supply chain management and the changing structure of US organic produce markets. Amer. Agricultural Econom. Assoc. Annual Meeting (2006) Long Beach, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urban R, Hauser J. Design and Marketing of New Products (1993) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Van den Poel D, Larivière B. Customer attrition analysis for financial services using proportional hazard models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2004) 157(1):196–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Heerde HJ, Leeflang PSH, Wittink DR. The estimation of pre- and postpromotion dips with store-level scanner data. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(3):383–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walgrave S, Manssens J. The making of the White March: The mass media as a mobilizing alternative to movement organizations. Mobilization (2000) 5(2):217–239Google Scholar
  • Zanoli R, Naspetti S. Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food: A means-end approach. British Food J. (2002) 104(8):643–653CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithaml VA. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Marketing (1988) 52(3):2–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zepeda L, Li J. Characteristics of organic food shoppers. J. Agricultural Appl. Econom. (2007) 39(1):17–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.