Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0727

References

  • Amiti M, Wei S-J. Service offshoring and productivity: Evidence from the U.S.. World Econom. (2009) 32(2):203–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arzaghi M, Henderson JV. Networking off Madison Avenue. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2007) 75(4):1011–1038CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass FM. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(5):215–227LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DR, Song S. Neighborhood effects and trial on the internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(4):361–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Luttmer EFP, Mullainathan S. Network effects and welfare cultures. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):1019–1055CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollinger B. Technology adoption in regulated markets: An empirical study of the southern California dry cleaning industry. (2012) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Brock WA, Durlaf SN, Heckman JJ, Leamer E. Interaction-based models. Handbook of Econometrics (2001) 5(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 3297–3380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choffray JM, Lilien GL. A decision-support system for evaluating sales prospects and launch strategies for new products. Indust. Marketing Management (1986) 15(1):75–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi J, Huiand SK, Bell DR. Spatiotemporal analysis of imitation behavior across new buyers at an online grocery retailer. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(1):75–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conley T, Udry C. Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2010) 100(1):35–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • CPUC California solar initiative annual program assessment. (2009) . Report, California Public Utilities Commission, San Francisco. http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/GRAPHICS/103173.PDFGoogle Scholar
  • De Giorgi G, Pellizzari M, Redaelli S. Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. (2010) 2(2):241–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duflo E, Saez E. The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(3):815–842CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartmann WR, Manchanda P, Nair H, Bothner M, Dodds P, Godes D, Hosanagar K, Tucker C. Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Lett. (2008) 19(3):287–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):195–212LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn ME, Vaughn RK. Green market geography: The spatial clustering of hybrid vehicles and LEED registered buildings. B.E.J. Econom. Anal. Policy (2009) 9(2):1–22Google Scholar
  • Kalish S, Lilien GL. A market entry timing model for new technologies. Management Sci. (1986) 32(2):194–205LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kratzer J, Lettl C. Distinctive roles of lead users and opinion leaders in the social networks of school children. J. Consumer Res. (2009) 36(4):646–659CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan V, Muller E, Bass FM. New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. J. Marketing (1990) 54(1):1–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan V, Muller E, Bass FM. Diffusion of new products: Empirical generalizations and managerial uses. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3, Supplement):G79–G88LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P, Xie Y, Youn N. The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(6):961–976LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Manski CF. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):531–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McShane B, Bradlow ET, Berger J. Visual influence and social groups. J. Marketing Res. (2012) . ePub ahead of print June 5CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moffitt R, Durlauf SN, Young HP. Policy interventions, low-level equilibria, and social interactions. Social Dynamics (2001) (MIT Press, Boston) 45–82Google Scholar
  • Munshi K, Myaux J. Social norms and the fertility transition. J. Developmental Econom. (2006) 80(1):1–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nair H, Manchanda P, Bhatia T. Asymmetric social interactions in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(5):883–895CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nam S, Manchanda P, Chintagunta PK. The effect of signal quality and contiguous word of mounth on customer acquisition for a video-on-demand service. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(4):690–700LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan S, Nair H. Estimating causal installed-base effects: A bias-correction approach. J. Marketing Res. (2012) . ePub ahead of print August 13Google Scholar
  • Nerlove M. Further evidence on the estimation of dynamic economic relations from a time series of cross sections. Econometrica (1971) 39(2):359–387CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickell SJ. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica (1981) 49(6):1417–1426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • PG&E Seeking solar champions. (2011) . Accessed August 3, 2012, http://www.pge.com/includes/docs/pdfs/shared/solar/csi/neighborhood_solar_champions_invitation.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Sacerdote B. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(2):681–704CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soetevent A. Empirics of the identification of social interactions: An evaluation of the approaches and their results. J. Econom. Surveys (2006) 20(2):193–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorensen A. Social learning and health plan choice. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(4):929–945CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sultan F, Farley JU, Lehmann DR. A meta-analysis of applications of diffusion models. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(1):70–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor M. Beyond technology-push and demand-pull: Lessons from California’s solar policy. Energy Econom. (2008) 30(6):2829–2854CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Topa G. Social interactions, local spillovers and unemployment. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2001) 68(2):261–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Windmeijer F. Moment conditions for fixed effects count data models with endogenous regressors. Econom. Lett. (2000) 68(1):21–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woolridge JM. Multiplicative panel data models without the strict exogeneity assumption. Econometric Theory (1997) 13(5):667–678CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.