Commentaries and Reply to “Can Brand Extension Signal Product Quality?” by Sridhar Moorthy
Published Online:1 Sep 2012https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0729
References
- . Subgame perfect implementation under value pertubations. Quart. J. Econom. (2012) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
- . An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):339–351Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Coke to put much-cherished trademark on diet cola in a $100 million campaign. Wall Street Journal (1982) July 9):1Google Scholar
- . Can brand extension signal product quality? Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(5):756–770Link, Google Scholar
- . Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality: An example of signaling by posting a bond. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19(3):458–466Crossref, Google Scholar
- . How far can a brand stretch? Understanding the role of self-construal. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(3):337–350Crossref, Google Scholar
- . The effects of extensions on the family brand name: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27(3):371–381Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Alba JW. Perceptions of brand extensions. Consumer Insights: Findings from Behavioral Research (2011) (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) 49–50Google Scholar
- . An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):339–351Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. J. Consumer Psych. (1998) 7(2):131–157Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Brands as signals: A cross-country validation study. J. Marketing (2006) 70(1):34–49Crossref, Google Scholar
- . The effects of extensions on brand name dilution and enhancement. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(4):464–473Crossref, Google Scholar
- . A connectionist model of brand–quality associations. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(3):331–350Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Mapping the bounds of incoherence: How far can you go and how does it affect your brand? Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(4):504–513Link, Google Scholar
- . The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(1):35–50Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Brand equity dilution. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2003) 45(1):12–15Google Scholar
- . The ownership effect in consumer responses to brand line stretches. J. Marketing (1999) 63(1):88–101Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Stock market reactions to brand extension announcements: The effects of brand attitude and familiarity. J. Marketing (1995) 59(1):63–77Crossref, Google Scholar
- . The reciprocal impact of brand leveraging: Feedback effects from brand extension evaluation to brand evaluation. Marketing Lett. (1997) 8(3):261–271Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand extensions have a negative impact? J. Marketing (1993) 57(3):71–84Crossref, Google Scholar
- . When are broader brands stronger brands? An accessibility perspective on the success of brand extensions. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(2):346–357Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Managing negative feedback effects associated with brand extensions: The impact of alternative branding strategies. J. Consumer Psych. (1997) 6(2):119–140Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Trading off between value creation and value appropriation: The financial implications of shifts in strategic emphasis. J. Marketing (2003) 67(1):63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
- . What makes brands elastic? The influence of brand concept and styles of thinking on brand extension evaluation. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 74(3):80–92Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Can brand extension signal product quality? Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(5):756–770Link, Google Scholar
- . Brand portfolio strategy and firm performance. J. Marketing (2009) 73(1):59–74Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Cultural orientation and brand dilution: Impact of motivation level and extension typicality. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(1):186–198Crossref, Google Scholar
- . How is manifest branding strategy related to the intangible value of a corporation? J. Marketing (2004) 68(4):126–141Crossref, Google Scholar
- . The negative impact of extensions: Can flagship products be diluted? J. Marketing (1998) 62(1):19–32Crossref, Google Scholar
- . The effect of negative information on the evaluations of brand extensions and the family brand. Adv. Consumer Res. (1991) 18:399–406Google Scholar
- . Brand synergy effects in multiple brand extensions. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):663–670Crossref, Google Scholar
- . The effects of brand name structure on brand extension evaluations and parent brand dilution. J. Marketing Res. (2012) 49(3):373–382Crossref, Google Scholar
- . The impact of brand extension introduction on choice. J. Marketing (2001) 65(4):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality: An example of signaling by posting a bond. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19(3):458–466Crossref, Google Scholar
- . The malleable brand: The role of implicit theories in evaluating brand extensions. J. Marketing (2010) 74(1):80–93Crossref, Google Scholar
- . An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):339–351Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Economic and behavioral perpectives on brand extension. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(5):772–776Google Scholar
- , Soberman D, Soman D. Brand extension strategy: An integrative framework. Flux: What Marketing Managers Need to Know to Navigate the New Environment (2012a) (University of Toronto Press, Toronto) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
- . Can brand extension signal product quallity? Marketing Sci. (2012b) 31(5):756–770Link, Google Scholar
- . Brand extensions: When to use them. Management Sci. (1992) 38(6):793–806Link, Google Scholar
- . On brand extension as a signal of product quality. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(5):771–772Google Scholar

