Exclusive Handset Arrangements in the Wireless Industry: A Competitive Analysis

References

• Accenture Convergence is now: Accenture Mobile handset study. (2005) . Report, Accenture, Chicago. http://s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/www.accenture.com/ContentPages/3160842.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Arya A, Mittendorf B, Sappington DEM. The make-or-buy decision in the presence of a rival: Strategic outsourcing to a common supplier. Management Sci. (2008) 54(10):1747–1758Link, Google Scholar
• AT&T Wireless (2009) . Written statement of Paul Roth President—Retail Sales and Service, AT&T Inc. before the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, June 17, United States Senate. Washington, DC. http://www.att.com/gen/public-affairs?pid=13774Google Scholar
• Balachander S, Ghosh B, Stock A. Why bundle discounts can be a profitable alternative to competing on price promotions. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(4):624–638Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Lin P. Downstream R&D, raising rivals' costs, and input price contracts. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2003) 21(2003):79–96Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu A, Vitharana P. Impact of customer knowledge heterogeneity on bundling strategy. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(4):792–801Link, Google Scholar
• Bergen M, Dutta S, Shugan SM. Branded variants: A retail perspective. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(1):9–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD, Whinston MD. Exclusive dealing. J. Political Econom. (1998) 106(1):64–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko D, Perry MK. Equilibrium incentives for exclusive dealing in a differentiated products oligopoly. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(4):646–667Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y. Equilibrium product bundling. J. Bus. (1997) 70(1):85–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y. On vertical mergers and their competitive effects. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(4):667–685Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Iyer G, Padmanabhan V. Referral infomediaries. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):412–434Link, Google Scholar
• Chiang WK, Chhajed D, Hess JD. Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Choi JC, Stefanadis C. Tying, investment, and the dynamic leverage theory. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(1):52–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JC, Yi S. Vertical foreclosure with the choice of input specifications. RAND J. Econom. (2000) 31(4):717–743Crossref, Google Scholar
• Columbia Institute for Tele-Information Market share data of US telecom in 12 subindustry markets. (2011) . Accessed November 12, 2012. http://www.4gsb.columbia.edu/citi/industrynews/USTelecomMarketGoogle Scholar
• Consumer Reports Best cell-phone service. (2009) 74(1):28–31Google Scholar
• Coughlan AT. Competition and cooperation in marketing channel choice: Theory and application. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):110–129Link, Google Scholar
• Coughlan AT, Wernerfelt B. On credible delegation by oligopolists: A discussion of distribution channel management. Management Sci. (1989) 35(2):226–239Link, Google Scholar
• CTIA Given the competitiveness of the wireless marketplace, there is no need to regulate the use or functionality of wireless handsets. (2007) . Report, CTIA, Washington, DC. http://files.ctia.org/pdf/TalkingPoints_CTIA_HandsetRegulation_4_07.pdfGoogle Scholar
• d'Aspremont C, Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse JF. On Hotelling's stability in competition. Econometrica (1979) 47(5):1145–1150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Koenigsberg O, Purohit D. Strategic decentralization and channel coordination. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(1):5–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dukes A, Gal-Or E. Negotiations and exclusivity contracts for advertising. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(2):222–245Link, Google Scholar
• Dukes A, Gal-Or E, Srinivasan K. Channel bargaining with retailer asymmetry. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(1):84–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Bergen M, John G. The governance of exclusive territories when dealers can bootleg. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(1):83–99Link, Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Heide JB, Bergen M. Vertical territorial restrictions and public policy. J. Marketing (1999) 63(4):121–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N. Desirability of compatibility in the absence of network externalities. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79(5):1165–1181Google Scholar
• Economides N. The incentive for non-price discrimination by an input monopolist. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1998) 16(1998):271–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrlich EM, Eisenach JA, Leighton WA. The impact of regulation on innovation and choice in wireless communications. Rev. Network Econom. (2010) 9(1). Article 2Google Scholar
• Elmer-Dewitt P. Munster on $10 iPhones, $30 TV subscriptions, moving beyond AT&T. Fortune (2009a) August 31). http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2009/08/31/munster-on-10-iphones-30-tv-subscriptions-moving-beyond-attGoogle Scholar
• Elmer-Dewitt P. Broader distribution could double iPhone sales in 2010—Morgan Stanley. Fortune (2009b) October 2). http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2009/10/02/broader-distribution-could-double-iphone-sales-in-2010-morgan-stanley/Google Scholar
• Euromonitor Country sector briefings for mobile phones from Euromonitor's Global Market Information Database. (2009) . Report, Euromonitor International, Chicago. http://www.euromonitor.com/mobile-phonesGoogle Scholar
• Farrell J, Monroe HK, Saloner G. The vertical organization of industry: Systems competition versus component competition. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1998) 7(2):143–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faulhaber GR, Hahn RW, Singer HJ. Assessing competition in the U.S. wireless markets: Review of the FCC's competition reports. Federal Comm. Law J. (2012) 64(2):319–369Google Scholar
• Federal Communication Commission (FCC) Fourteenth annual report on mobile wireless competition. (2010) . Report (May 20), FCC, Washington, DC. http://transition.fcc.gov/14report.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Frieden R. Testimony at U.S. Senate hearing on the consumer wireless experience. (2009) . Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportaion, Washington, DC. http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/r/m/rmf5/Senate%20Testimony.docGoogle Scholar
• Gaudet G, Long NV. Vertical integration, foreclosure, and profits in the presence of double marginalization. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1996) 5(3):409–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghosh B, Balachander S. Competitive bundling and counterbundling with generalist and specialist firms. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):159–168Link, Google Scholar
• Guo L, Zhang J. Consumer deliberation and product line design. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(6):995–1007Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Lee RS. Exclusivity and control. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2011) 20(3):679–708Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn RW, Litan RE, Singer HJ. The economics of “wireless net neutrality”. J. Competition Law Econom. (2007) 3(3):399–451Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Tirole J. Vertical integration and market foreclosure. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity: Microeconom. (1990) 1990:205–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heide JB, Dutta S, Bergen M. Exclusive dealing and business efficiency: Evidence from industry practice. J. Law Econom. (1998) 41(2):387–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Investor's Business Daily Ever hear of LG Electronics? (2003) December 26). http://accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-116154599/ever-hear-lg-electronics.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Krattenmaker KG, Salop SC. Anticompetitive exclusion: Raising rivals' costs to achieve power over price. Yale Law J. (1986a) 96(2):209–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krattenmaker KG, Salop SC. Competition and cooperation in the market for exclusionary rights. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986b) 76(2):109–113Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Villas-Boas JM. When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(3):507–524Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Ruan R. On complementing the retail channel with a direct online channel. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2006) 4(3):289–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lagorce A. Wider distribution lifting iPhone sales in Europe. Market Watch (2009) November 19). http://articles.marketwatch.com/2009-11-19/industries/30800728_1_market-3gs-iphoneGoogle Scholar
• Lal R, Villas-Boas JM. Exclusive dealing and price promotions. J. Bus. (1996) 69(2):159–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee RS. Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. (2012) . Working paper, New York University, New York. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~rslee/papers/VIExclusivity.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Slovic P. The Construction of Preference (2006) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin YJ. The dampening of competition effect of exclusive dealing. J. Indust. Econom. (1990) 39(2):209–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martimort D. Exclusive dealing, common agency, and multiprincipals incentive theory. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27(1):1–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathewson GF, Winter RA. An economic theory of vertical restraints. RAND J. Econom. (1984) 15(1):27–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathewson GF, Winter RA. The competitive effects of vertical agreements: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77(5):1057–1062Google Scholar
• Matutes C, Regibeau P. “Mix and match”: Product compatibility without network externalities. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19(2):221–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matutes C, Regibeau P. Compatibility and bundling of complementary goods in a duopoly. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(1):37–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGuire TW, Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(2):161–191Link, Google Scholar
• Mintel Mobile phone services–US–August 2008. (2008) . Report, Mintel International Group, Chicago. http://oxygen.mintel.com/display/296853/Google Scholar
• Mintel Mobile communications services–US–August 2009. (2009a) . Report, Mintel International Group, Chicago. http://oxygen.mintel.com/display/393593/Google Scholar
• Mintel Telecoms–Europe–April 2009. (2009b) . Report, Mintel International Group, Chicago. http://oxygen.mintel.com/display/395588Google Scholar
• Mintel Mobile phone services–US–August 2010. (2010) . Report, Mintel International Group, Chicago. http://oxygen.mintel.com/display/482741Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS. Strategic decentralization in channels. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(4):335–355Link, Google Scholar
• NPD Group (2011) . Verizon's iPhone sales help make Apple the third-largest mobile phone brand in the U.S. Press release (April 28), http://www.npd.com/press/releases/press_110428.htmlGoogle Scholar
• O'Brien DP, Shaffer G. On the dampening-of-competition effect of exclusive dealing. J. Indust. Econom. (1993) 41(2):215–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Brien DP, Shaffer G. Nonlinear supply contracts, exclusive dealing, and equilibrium market foreclosure. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1997) 6(4):755–785Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ofcom The consumer experience—research report. (2009) . Report (December 9), http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/market-data/consumer-experience-reports/ce09/Google Scholar
• Ofek E, Katona Z, Sarvary M. “Bricks and clicks”: The impact of product returns on the strategies of multichannel retailers. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(1):42–60Link, Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer2010 Handset Guidebook (2009) (Oppenheimer & Co., New York) Google Scholar
• Optus Australians can now live their social life without limits with Optus and MOTOBLUR. (2010) . Press release (March 30), http://www.optus.com.au/aboutoptus/About+Optus/Media+Centre/Media+Releases/2010/Australians+can+now+live+their+social+life+without+limits+with+Optus+and+MOTOBLURGoogle Scholar
• Ordover J, Saloner G, Salop SC. Equilibrium vertical foreclosure. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(1):127–142Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ. The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purohit D. Dual distribution channels: The competition between rental agencies and dealers. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):228–245Link, Google Scholar
• Rasmusen EB, Ramseyer JM, Wiley JS. Naked exclusion. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(5):1137–1145Google Scholar
• Rey P, Stiglitz J. The role of exclusive territories in producers' competition. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(3):431–451Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rey P, Tirole J. The logic of vertical restraints. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):921–939Google Scholar
• Riordan MH. Anticompetitive vertical integration by a dominant firm. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(5):1232–1248Google Scholar
• Rural Cellular Association (RCA) (2008) . Petition for rulemaking regarding exclusivity arrangements between commercial wireless carriers and handset manufacturers before the Federal Communications Commission, May 20, Washington DC. http://www.rca-usa.org/associations/6491/files/RCA%20Petition%20for%20Rulemaking%20-%20FINAL%20052008-2.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Salinger M. Vertical mergers and market foreclosure. Quart. J. Econom. (1988) 103(2):345–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salop SC, Scheffman DT. Raising rivals' costs. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73(2):267–271Google Scholar
• Salop SC, Scheffman DT. Cost-raising strategies. J. Indust. Econom. (1987) 36(1):19–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savitz E. 10 reasons Apple will sell iPhone via more U.S. telcos. Tech. Trader Daily (blog), Barrons (2009) . May 6, http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/05/06/10-reasons-apple-will-sell-iphone-via-more-us-telcos/Google Scholar
• Shaffer G. Slotting allowances and optimal product variety. Adv. Econom. Anal. Policy (2005) 5(1). Article 3Google Scholar
• Shugan SM. The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(2):99–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shulman JD, Coughlan AT, Savaskan RC. Optimal restocking fees and information provision in an integrated demand-supply model of product returns. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(4):577–594Link, Google Scholar
• Shulman JD, Coughlan AT, Savaskan RC. Optimal reverse channel structure for consumer product returns. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(6):1071–1085Link, Google Scholar
• Shulman JD, Coughlan AT, Savaskan RC. Managing consumer returns in a competitive environment. Management Sci. (2011) 57(2):347–362Link, Google Scholar
• Sibley DS, Weisman DL. Raising rivals' costs: The entry of an upstream monopolist into downstream markets. Inform. Econom. Policy (1998) 10(4):451–470Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I. Will I like a “medium” pillow? Another look at constructed and inherent preferences. J. Consumer Psych. (2008) 18(3):155–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson J, Wickelgren AL. Naked exclusion, efficient breach and downstream competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(4):1305–1320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sprint Nextel Sprint Nextel's petition to deny in AT&T's proposed takeover of T-Mobile. (2011) Proceeding 11-65, Federal Communications CommissionMay 31Washington, DC http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021675883Google Scholar
• Stefanadis C. Selective contracts, foreclosure and the Chicago school view. J. Law Econom. (1998) 16(2):429–450Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stennek J. Exclusive quality: Why exclusive distribution may benefit the TV-viewers. (2008) . Working paper, RIIE, Stockholm. http://www.cepr.org/meets/wkcn/6/6670/papers/Stennek.pdfGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Senate Hearing U.S. Senate hearing on the consumer wireless experience. (2009) . Hearing, June 17, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Washington, DC. http://commerce.senate.gov/publicGoogle Scholar
• Vickers J. Competition and regulation in vertically related markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1995) 62(1):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM. Sleeping with the enemy: Should competitors share the same advertising agency? Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(2):190–202Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM. Product variety and endogenous pricing with evaluation costs. Management Sci. (2009) 55(8):1338–1346Link, Google Scholar
• Vodafone Vodafone launches the new exclusive BlackBerry Storm. (2008) . Press release (October 8), http://corporate.vodafone.it/area-stampa/comunicati-stampa/comunicati/972Google Scholar
• Weeds H. TV wars: Exclusive content and platform competition in pay TV. (2009) . CEPR Discussion Paper 8781, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London. http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~hfweeds/CEPR_DP8781_TV%20Wars_Jan%202012.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Wu T. Wireless carterfone. Internat. J. Commun. (2007) 1:389–426Google Scholar
• Whinston MD. Tying, foreclosure and exclusion. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(4):837–859Google Scholar
• ZDNet France Exclusivity on iPhone: The supreme court rescued Orange. [In French.]. (2010) February 16). http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/exclusivite-sur-l-iphone-la-cour-de-cassation-repeche-orange-39713097.htm#xtor=RSS-1Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Atkins D, Liu Y. Effects of distribution channel structure in markets with vertically differentiated products. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2009) 7(4):377–397Crossref, Google Scholar