Media Multiplexing Behavior: Implications for Targeting and Media Planning

References

• Ainslie A, Rossi PE. Similarities in choice behavior across multiple categories. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):91–106Link, Google Scholar
• Answani A, Bickel P, Tomlin C. Regression on manifolds: Estimation of the exterior derivative. Ann. Statist. (2011) 39(1):48–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belch GE, Belch MA. Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communication Perspectives (1998) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Bhat CR. A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: Formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Transportation Res. Part B (2005) 39(8):679–707Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhat CR, Pinjari AR. The generalized multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (GMDCEV) model: Allowing for non-additively separable and flexible utility forms. (2010) . Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, AustinGoogle Scholar
• Chiang J. A simultaneous approach to the whether, what and how much to buy questions. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(4):297–315Link, Google Scholar
• Chib S, Seetharaman PB, Strijnev A. Analysis of multi-category purchase incidence decisions using IRI market basket data. Adv. Econometrics (2002) 16:55–90Google Scholar
• Chung J, Rao VR. A general choice model for bundles with multiple-category products: Application to market segmentation and optimal pricing for bundles. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(2):115–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Rossiter JR. Comparing perceptions of marketing communication channels. Eur. J. Marketing (2011) 45(1/2):6–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Rust RT. Determining the optimal return on investment for an advertising campaign. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 95:511–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P. Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):66–81Link, Google Scholar
• Edwards Y, Allenby GM. Multivariate analysis of multiple response data. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40:321–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanemann M. Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica (1984) 52(3):541–561Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen K, Singh VP, Chintagunta PK. Understanding store brand purchase behavior across categories. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):75–90Link, Google Scholar
• Isaacson W. How to save your newspaper. Time (2009) February 5). http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1877402,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Kantar Media Kantar Media reports U.S. advertising expenditures declined 12.3 percent in 2009. (2010) . Press release (March 17), Kantar Media, New York. http://kantarmedia.com/intelligence/press/kantar-media-reports-us-advertising-expenditures-declined-123-percent-2009Google Scholar
• Kim J, Allenby GM, Rossi PE. Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(3):223–228Link, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim J, Alleby GM. A direct utility model for asymmetric complements. (2011) . Working paper, Ohio State University, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
• Luo L, Ratchford BT, Yang B. Why we do what we do: A model of activity consumption. J. Marketing Res. (2012) . ePub ahead of print December 13Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Ansari A, Gupta S. The “shopping basket”: A model for multicategory purchase incidence decisions. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(2):95–114Link, Google Scholar
• Mantrala MK, Weitz BA, Wensley R. Allocating marketing resources. Handbook of Marketing (2002) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 409–435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta N. Investigating consumers' purchase incidence and brand choice decisions across multiple product categories: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):196–217Link, Google Scholar
• Mehta N, Chen X, Narasimhan O. Examining demand elasticities in Hanemann's framework: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(3):422–437Link, Google Scholar
• Naik PA, Raman K. Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(4):375–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naik PA, Raman K, Winer RS. Planning marketing-mix strategies in the presence of interaction effects: Empirical and equilibrium analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(6):25–34Link, Google Scholar
• Pilotta JJ, Schultz DE. Simultaneous media experience and synesthesia. J. Advertising Res. (2005) 45(1):19–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pilotta JJ, Schultz DE, Drenik G, Rist P. “Simultaneous media usage”: A critical consumer orientation to media planning. J. Consumer Behav. (2004) 3(3):285–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Alpert MI. An audience flow model of television viewing choice. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(2):113–124Link, Google Scholar
• Schultz DE. Outdated approaches to planning needs revamping. Marketing News (2002) 36(23):6–7Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Bradlow ET, Fader PS. Portfolio dynamics for customers of a multiservice provider. Management Sci. (2011) 57(3):471–486Link, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman PB, Ainslie A, Chintagunta PK. Investigating household state dependence effects across categories. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(4):488–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shachar R, Emerson JW. Cast demographics, unobserved segments, and heterogeneous switching costs in a television viewing choice model. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):173–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith TM, Gopalakrishna S, Chaterjee R. A three-stage model of integrated marketing communications at the marketing–sales interface. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(4):564–579Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song I, Chintagunta PK. A discrete-continuous model for multicategory purchase behavior of households. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):595–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinberg B. Study: Young consumers switch media 27 times an hour. Advertising Age (2012) April 9). http://adage.com/article/news/study-young-consumers-switch-media-27-times-hour/234008/Google Scholar
• Vakratsas D, Ambler T. How advertising works: What do we really know? J. Marketing (1999) 63(1):26–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wendel S, Dellaert BGC. Situation variation in consumers' media channel consideration. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2005) 33(4):575–584Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC. A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):356–378Link, Google Scholar