When Do Markets Tip? A Cognitive Hierarchy Approach

References

• Amaldoss W, Bettman JR, Payne JW. Biased but efficient: An investigation of coordination facilitated by asymmetric dominance. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(5):903–921Link, Google Scholar
• Ambrus A, Argenziano R. Asymmetric networks in two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. (2009) 1(1):17–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(3):668–691Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhatt M, Camerer CF. Self-referential thinking and equilibrium as states of mind in games: fMRI evidence. Games Econom. Behav. (2005) 52(2):424–459Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Camerer CF, Lovallo D. To review or not to review? Limited strategic thinking at the movie box office. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. (2012) 4(2):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Camerer CF, Lovallo D. Estimating structural models of equilibrium and cognitive hierarchy thinking in the field: The case of withheld movie critic reviews. Management Sci. (2013) 59(3):733–747Link, Google Scholar
• Caillaud B, Jullien B. Competing cybermediaries. Eur. Econom. Rev. (2001) 45(4):797–808Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caillaud B, Jullien B. Chicken and egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34(2):521–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Glimcher PW, Fehr E, Camerer CF, Poldrack RA. Behavioral game theory and the neural basis of strategic choice. Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (2009) (Academic Press, London) 193–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho T-H, Chong J-K. A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(3):861–898Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes MA, Crawford VP. Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(5):1737–1768Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damiano E, Li H. Competing matchmaking. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2008) 6(4):789–818Crossref, Google Scholar
• David PA. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 77(2):332–337Google Scholar
• Dorris MC, Glimcher PW. Activity in posterior parietal cortex is correlated with the subjective desirability of an action. Neuron (2004) 44(2):365–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Blundell R, Newey WK, Persson T. Bounded rationality in industrial organization. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications (2006) 2(Ninth World Congress, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 142–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Fudenberg D. Knife-edge or plateau: When do market models tip? Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(4):1249–1278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Fudenberg D, Möbius M. Competing auctions. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2004) 2(1):30–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Xiao M. Who thinks about the competition? Managerial ability and strategic entry in US local telephone markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) 101(7):3130–3161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Yang B. Are all managers created equal? J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(5):612–622Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haile PA, Hortacsu A, Kosenok G. On the empirical content of quantal response equilibrium. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98(1):180–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC, Selten R. A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Lim N, Camerer CF. Modeling the psychology of consumer and firm behavior with behavioral economics. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):307–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hossain T, Morgan J. The quest for QWERTY. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(2):435–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hossain T, Minor D, Morgan J. Competing matchmakers: An experimental analysis. Management Sci. (2011) 57(11):1913–1925Link, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C. Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspect. (1994) 8(2):93–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps D, Milgrom P, Roberts J, Wilson R. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27(2):245–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz SJ, Margolis SE. The fable of the keys. J. Law Econom. (1990) 33(1):1–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz SJ, Margolis SE. Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. J. Econom. Perspect. (1994) 8(2):133–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagel R. Unravelling in guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85(5):1313–1326Google Scholar
• Ostling R, Wang JT-Y, Chou EY, Camerer CF. Testing game theory in the field: Swedish LUPI lottery games. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. (2011) 3(3):1–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2003) 1(4):990–1029Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schelling TC. The Strategy of Conflict (1960) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Stahl DO, Wilson P. On players' models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games Econom. Behav. (1995) 10(1):218–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Yin Y, Niraj R. Does quality win? Network effects versus quality in high-tech markets. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(2):135–149Crossref, Google Scholar