To Zap or Not to Zap: A Study of the Determinants of Channel Switching During Commercials
Published Online:1 May 1998https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.17.2.124
References
- Using single-source data to select television programs based on purchasing behavior. J. Advertising Res. (1991) 31(6):9–17Google Scholar
- Attributes of likeable television commercials. J. Advertising Res. (1990) 30(3):38–44Google Scholar
- The changing commercial climate. Current Issues Res. Advertising (1990) 13:343–368Crossref, Google Scholar
- Regression models and life tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. (1972) 71(Dec.):823–829Google Scholar
- What happens to television ratings during commercial breaks? J. Advertising Res. (1995) 35(January/Research):37–47Google Scholar
- SSC&B offers cure for commercial “zapping.”. Advertising Age (1984) 55(17, April 16):55–56Google Scholar
- . Television: And now a word from our…zap (revisited). Marketing Media Decisions (1984) 19(9):162–166Google Scholar
- Music, music videos and wearout. Psych. Marketing (1993) 10(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
- Satiation effects of TV commercials. J. Advertising Res. (1969) 9(1):3–8Google Scholar
- . Television commercial wearout. J. Advertising Res. (1973) 13(October):47–54Google Scholar
- A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica (1984) 52:271–320Crossref, Google Scholar
- Profiling the zappers. J. Advertising Res. (1985) 25(2):13–24Google Scholar
- Analyzing duration times in marketing: Evidence for the effectiveness of hazard rate models. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(4):395–414Link, Google Scholar
- Investigating household purchase timing decisions: A conditional hazard function approach. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(1):1–23Link, Google Scholar
- A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(4):379–390Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Zapping—The real issue is communication. J. Advertising Res. (1985) 25(2):9–12Google Scholar
- Competitive clutter in network television advertising: Current levels and advertiser responses. J. Advertising Res. (1995) 35(January/February):49–57Google Scholar
- . Zapping of TV ads appears pervasive. Wall Street Journal (1988) April 25Google Scholar
- Why three exposures may be enough. J. Advertising Res. (1972) 12(6):11–14Google Scholar
- . The current scope of channel switching. Marketing Media Decisions (1985) 20(8):144–146Google Scholar
- On the interpretation of discriminant analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1969) 6(May):156–63Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Zapping nonsense: Should television media planners loose sleep over it? Internat. J. Advertising (1991) 10(3):217–222Google Scholar
- Network Television Association Television viewer retention study: Six dayparts. (1992) (Network Television Association, New York) Google Scholar
- Multiple dimensions of performance for 30-second and 15-second commercials. J. Advertising Res. (1991) 31(August/September):18–25Google Scholar
- Advertising repetition: A critical review of wearin and wearout. Current Issues Res. Advertising (1988) 11:285–329Google Scholar
- . Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. J. Consumer Res. (1983) 10:134–148Crossref, Google Scholar
- Consumer memory for television advertising: A field study of duration, serial position, and competition effects. J. Consumer Res. (1997) 23(March):362–372Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Advertising and Promotion Management (1997) 2nd ed(McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
- Predicting the effectiveness of different strategies of advertising variation: A test of the repetition-variation hypotheses. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 17(2):192–202Crossref, Google Scholar
- The effects of length, content, and repetition on television commercial effectiveness. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(February):91–104Crossref, Google Scholar
- Creative ad ventures/automatic returns/great moments in advertising/zapping viewer apathy. World (1986) 20(1):8–20Google Scholar
- Effective Television Advertising (1986) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
- . $6 Billion down the drain!/background on zapping. Marketing News (1984) 18, 19(1):36–38Google Scholar
- . Quest for the zap-less ad. Advertising Age (1986) 57(3, January 13):24Google Scholar
- Channel flickers and video speeders. J. Advertising Res. (1985) 25(2):21–25Google Scholar
- Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1968) 9(2):1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Zapping and its impact on brand purchase behavior. J. Advertising Res. (1993) 33(1):58–66Google Scholar

