Asymmetric and Neighborhood Cross-Price Effects: Some Empirical Generalizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.18.1.23

References

  • Ailawadi Kusum L. , Gedenk Karen , Neslin Scott A. Pursuing the price-conscious consumer: Store brands versus national brand promotions. (1998) . Working paper #98-119, Amos Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH Google Scholar
  • Allenby Greg M. A unified approach to identifying, estimating and testing demand structures with aggregate scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8 Summer 265 280 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allenby Greg M. , Lenk Peter . Modeling household purchase behavior with logistic normal regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1994) 89 December 1218 1231 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allenby Greg M. , Rossi Peter E. Quality perceptions and asymmetric switching between brands. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10 Summer 185 204 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Assmus Gert , Farley John U. , Lehmann Donald R. How advertising affects sales: Meta-analysis of econometric results. J. Marketing Res. (1984) 21 February 65 74 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass Frank M. Empirical generalizations and marketing science: A personal view. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14 3 G6 G19 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell David R. , Chiang Jeongwen , Padmanabhan V. The “84/14/2” rule revisited: What drives choice, incidence and quantity elasticities? (1998) . Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA Google Scholar
  • Bemmaor Albert , Mouscheaux Dominique . Measuring shortterm effect of in-store promotion and retail advertising on brand sales: A factorial experiment. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28 May 202 214 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg Robert C. , Wisniewski Kenneth J. Price induced patterns of competition. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8 Fall 291 309 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg Robert C. , Briesch Richard , Fox Edward . How promotions work. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14 3 G122 G132 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg Robert C. , Neslin Scott A. Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods, and Strategies (1990) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bolton Ruth N. Relationship between market characteristics and promotional price elasticities. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8 Spring 153 169 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg Bart , Wathieu Luc . Asymmetric promotion effects and brand positioning. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15 4 379 394 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin Randolph , Srinivasan V. Determining interbrand substitutability through survey measurement of consumer preference structures. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28 February 58 71 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter Gregory S. , Cooper Lee G. , Hanssens Dominique , Midgley David F. Modeling asymmetric competition. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7 4 393 412 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta Pradeep . Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice and purchase quantity decisions of households. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12 Spring 184 208 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper Lee . Competitive maps: The structure underlying asymmetric cross elasticities. Management Sci. (1988) 34 June 707 723 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Farley John U. , Lehmann Donald R. Meta-Analysis in Marketing (1986) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
  • Greene William H. Econometric Analysis (1993) (Macmillian, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gupta Sunil . Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25 November 342 355 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardie Bruce , Johnson Eric , Fader Peter . Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12 4 378 394 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heath Timothy B. , Ryu Gangseong , Chatterjee Subimal , McCarthy Michael S. Theories of asymmetric switching and tests thereof. (1996) . Working paper no. 746, Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA Google Scholar
  • Hoch Stephen J. , Banerji Shumeet . When do private labels succeed? Sloan Management Rev. (1993) 34 Summer 57 67 Google Scholar
  • Hunter John E. , Schmidt Frank L. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Kamakura Wagner , Russell Gary . A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26 November 379 390 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khermouch Gerry . Buck privates: Brands stem tide of PL encroachment. Brandweek (1996) 1 . January 1 Google Scholar
  • Kim Byung Do , Blattberg Robert , Rossi Peter . Modeling the distribution of price sensitivity and implications for optimal retail pricing. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1995) 13 July 291 303 Google Scholar
  • Kmenta J. Elements of Econometrics (1986) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lambin Jean J. , Naert Philippe , Bultez Alain . Optimal market behavior in oligopoly. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1975) 6 105 128 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemon Katherine N. , Winer Russell S. Evaluating consumers' responses to private label price promotions utilizing brandloyalty based segmentation. (1993) . Working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CA Google Scholar
  • Mulhern Francis , Leone Robert . Implicit price bundling of retail products: A multiproduct approach to maximizing store profitability. J. Marketing (1991) 55 October 63 76 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao Ram C. Pricing and promotions in asymmetric duopolies. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10 Spring 131 144 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Russell Gary . A model of latent symmetry in cross-price elasticities. Marketing Lett. (1992) 3 April 157 169 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russell Gary , Bucklin Randolph , Srinivasan V. Identifying multiple preference segments from own- and cross-price elasticities. Marketing Lett. (1993) 4 January 5 18 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russell Gary , Bolton Ruth . Implications of market structure for elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25 August 229 241 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethuraman Raj . A meta-analysis of national brand and store brand cross-promotional price elasticities. Marketing Lett. (1995) 6 4 275 286 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethuraman Raj . A model of how discounting high-priced brands affects the sales of low-priced brands. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 23 November 399 409 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethuraman Raj , Tellis Gerard . An analysis of the tradeoff between advertising and price discounting. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28 May 160 174 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sivakumar K. Asymmetric quality tier competition: An alternative explanation. (1997) (Marketing Science Institute, Boston, MA) . Technical Working Paper Report No. 97-115 (July) Google Scholar
  • Sivakumar K. , Raj S. P. Quality-tier competition: How price changes influence brand choice and category choice. J. Marketing (1997) 61 July 71 84 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan V. , MacLaurin Dana . Product and price competition in an oligopoly. (1998) . Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA Google Scholar
  • Tellis Gerard J. The price elasticity of selective demand: A meta-analysis of econometric models of sales. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25 November 331 341 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.