Are Sale Signs Less Effective When More Products Have Them?

References

• Allen J. W., Harrell G. D., Hutt M. D.Price Awareness Study (1976) (The Food Marketing Institute, Washington D.C.) Google Scholar
• Anderson Eric T., Simester Duncan I. The role of sale signs. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):139–155Link, Google Scholar
• Berman Barry, Evans Joel R.Retail Management: A Strategic Approach (1992) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Besanko David, Sachin Gupta Dipak Jain. Logit demand estimation under competitive pricing behavior: An equilibrium framework (1997) (Northwestern University, Evanston, IL) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Chintagunta Pradeep K., Vrinda Kadiyali Naufel, Vilcassim J.Competitive interactions in price and advertising: An analysis of the ‘share of voice to share of market’ rule (1998) (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Conover Jerry, Richard Lutz. The accuracy of price knowledge: Issues in research methodology. Advances in Consumer Research (1986) 13(Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI) 589–593Google Scholar
• Dickson Peter, Sawyer Alan. The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. J. Marketing (1990) 54(July):42–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover Rajiv, Srinivasan V.Evaluating the effects of retail promotions in segmented markets (1989) (Stanford University, Stanford, CA) . Working paper #1059Google Scholar
• Guadagni Peter M., Little John D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(Summer):203–238Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta Sunil. Impact of sales promotions on when what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. (1988) XXV(November):342–355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inman Jeffrey J., McAlister Leigh, Hoyer Wayne D. Promotion signal: Proxy for a price cut. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 17(June):74–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inman Jeffrey J., McAlister Leigh. A retailer promotion policy model considering promotion signal sensitivity. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(4):339–356Link, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali Vrinda, Chintagunta Pradeep, Vilcassim Naufel. Manufacturer-retailer channel interactions and implications for channel power: An empirical investigation of pricing in a local market. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(Spring):127–148Link, Google Scholar
• Mason J. Barry, Mayer Morris L.Modern Retailing: Theory and Practice (1990) (BPI/Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Narasimhan Chakravarthi, Neslin Scott A., Sen Subrata K. Promotional elasticities and category characteristics. J. Marketing (1996) 60(April):17–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salop Steven. The noisy monopolist: Imperfect information price dispersion, and price discrimination. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1977) 44:393–406Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawyer Alan G. Demand artifacts in laboratory experiments in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1975) 1(March):20–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimp Terence A., Hyatt Eva M., Snyder David J. A critical appraisal of demand artifacts in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 18(December):273–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiving Mark, Winer Russell. An empirical analysis of price endings with scanner data. J. Consumer Res. (1997) 24(June):57–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tellis Gerard J. The price elasticity of selective demand: A meta-analysis of econometric models of sales. J. Marketing Res. (1988) XXV(November):331–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler Richard. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(Summer):199–214Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas Miguel, Winer Russell. Endogeneity in brand choice models (1996) (University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica (1980) 48:817–330Crossref, Google Scholar