Designing Optimal Sales Contests: A Theoretical Perspective

References

  • Anderson E. The salesperson as outside agent or employee: A transaction cost analysis. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(1):234–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arnold B. C., Balakrishnan N., Nagaraja H. N.A First Course in Order Statistics (1992) (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Basu A. K., Lal R., Srinivasan V., Staelin R. Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(4):267–291LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bull C., Schotter A., Weigelt K. Tournaments and piece rates: An experimental study. J. Political Econom. (1987) 95(1):1–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Business WireToshiba awards top resellers with $40,000 cash and other prizes in wavelength reseller contest (1997) November10Google Scholar
  • Chrapek D. Sales incentives expenditures top $7.8 billion mark in 1988. Premium Incentive Bus. (1989) June3Google Scholar
  • Churchill G. A., Ford N. M., Walker O.Sales Force Management: Planning, Implementation and Control (1993) (Richard D. Irwin, Home-wood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Ehrenberg R. G., Bognanno M. L. Do tournaments have incentive effects?. J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(6):1307–1324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freedman Robert J. For more profitable sales look beyond volume. Sales Marketing Management (1989) 141(9):50–53Google Scholar
  • Gaba A., Kalra A. Risk behavior in response to quotas and contests. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):417–434LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Green J. R., Stokey N. L. A comparison of tournaments and contracts. J. Political Econom. (1983) 91(3):349–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson E. J., Schkade D. A. Bias in utility assessments: Further evidence and explanation. Management Sci. (1989) 35(4):406–424LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kotler P.Marketing Management: Analysis Planning, Implementation and Control (1997) 9th ed.(Prentice-Hall)Google Scholar
  • Knoeber C. R., Thurman W. N. Testing the theory and tournaments: An empirical analysis of broiler production. J. Labor Econom. (1994) 12(2):155–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R., Outland D., Staelin R. Salesforce compensation plans: An individual-level analysis. Marketing Lett. (1994) 6(1):117–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E. P. Pay equality and industrial politics. J. Political Econom. (1989) 97(3):561–580CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E. P., Rosen S. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89:843–864CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marchetti Michele. Master motivators. Sales Marketing Management (1998) 150(4):38–46Google Scholar
  • Murphy W. H., Sohi R. S. Salespersons perceptions about sales contests: Towards a greater understanding. Eur. J. Marketing (1995) 29(13):42–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy W. H., Dacin P. A. Sales contests: A research agenda. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (1998) XVIII(1):1–16Google Scholar
  • Nalebuff B., Stiglitz J. E. Prizes and incentives: Toward a general theory of compensation and competition. Bell J. Econom. (1983) 14:21–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Keeffe M., Viscusi W. K., Zeckhauser R. J. Economic contests: Comparative reward schemes. J. Labor Econom. (1984) 2:27–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen S. Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(4):701–714Google Scholar
  • Stanton W. J., Buskirk R. H., Spiro R. L.Management of a Sales Force (1991) (Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL) Google Scholar
  • The Cincinnati EnquirerTristate business summary (1997) C12Google Scholar
  • Wall Street LetterMerrill launches sales contest (1995) November6Google Scholar
  • Weigelt K., Dukerich J., Schotter A. Reactions to discrimination in an incentive pay compensation scheme: A game-theoretic approach. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1989) 44:26–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.