Reward Programs and Tacit Collusion

References

• Banerjee A., Summers L.On frequent flyer programs and other loyalty-inducing arrangements (1987) (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Blattberg R. C., Neslin S. A.Sales Promotion: Concept, Methods, and Strategies (1990) (Prentice Hall, NJ)Google Scholar
• Calkin S. Unfair methods of competition in the 1990s: The example of frequent flyer program. The 1990s Policy Research in Marketing (1990) (The University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend, IN) Google Scholar
• Caminal R., Matutes C. Endogenous switching cost in a duopoly model. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1990) 8:353–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu W. J., Gerstner E., Hess J. Costs and benefits of hard-sell. J. Marketing Res. (1995) XXXII:97–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P., Maskin E. The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games II. Applications. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1986) LIII:27–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• D' Aspremont C., Gabszewicz J. J., Thisse J. F. On Hotelling's ‘Stability in Competition’. Econometrica (1979) 47(5):1145–1149Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Palma A., Ginsburgh V., Papageorgiou Y. Y., Thisse J. F. The principle of minimum differentiation holds under sufficient heterogeneity. EconometricaXIII:767–781Google Scholar
• Farrell Joseph, Carl Shapiro. Dynamic competition with switching cost. Rand J. Econom. (1988) 19(1):123–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenburg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1992) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Goldsmith R., Flynn L., Bonn M. An empirical study of heavy users of travel agencies. J. Travel Res. (1994) 33(1):38–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Econom. J. (1931) XXXIX:41–57Google Scholar
• Kim B. D., Rossi P. Purchase frequency, sample selection, and price sensitivity: The heavy user bias. Marketing Lett. (1994) 5(1):57–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim B. D., Shi M., Srinivasan K.Colluding through capacity reduction: A rationale for frequent flier programs (1997) (Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Klemperer P. Markets with consumer switching cost. Quart. J. Econom. (1987a) 102:375–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P. The competitiveness of markets with switching costs. Rand J. Econom. (1987b) 18(1):138–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S. Market segmentation self-selection and product line design. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(4):288–305Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S. Theoretical modeling in marketing. J. Marketing (1993) 57(2):92–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C. A price discrimination theory of coupons. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(2):128–146Link, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C. Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. (1988) 61(4):427–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raju J. S., Srinivasan V., Lal R. The effects of brand loyalty on competitive price promotional strategies. Management Sci. (1990) 36(3):276–304Link, Google Scholar
• Salop S. C., Stiglitz J., Mathewson G. F. Practices that (credibly) facilitate oligopoly coordination. New Development in the Analysis of Market Structure (1986) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmittlein D., Cooper L., Morrision D. Truth in concentration in the land of (80/20) laws. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(2):167–183Link, Google Scholar
• Schultz D. E., Robinson W. A.Sales Promotion Essentials (1982) (Crain Books, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Shaffer G., Zhang Z. J. Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(4):395–416Link, Google Scholar
• Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1990) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Twedt D. W. How important to marketing strategy in the ‘heavy users’?. J. Marketing (1964) 28:71–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Weizsäcker C. The costs of substitution. Econometrica (1984) 52(5):1085–1116Crossref, Google Scholar