Structural Analysis of Manufacturer Pricing in the Presence of a Strategic Retailer

References

• Agrawal D. Effect on brand loyalty on advertising and trade promotions: A game theoretic analysis with empirical evidence. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):86–108Link, Google Scholar
• Allenby G. M. A unified approach to identifying, estimating and testing demand structures with aggregate scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8:265–280Link, Google Scholar
• Allenby G. M., Rossi P. There is no aggregation bias: Why aggregate macro logit models work. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1991) 9(1):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M. K.Retailer response to trade promotion: An incremental analysis of forward buying and retail promotion (1991) (University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX) . Unpublished doctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
• Bell D., Lattin J. Shopping behavior and consumer preference for store price format: Why “large basket” shoppers prefer EDLP. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):66–88Link, Google Scholar
• Berkowitz E. N., Kerin R. A., Hartley S. W., Rudelius W.Marketing (1999) 6th ed.(Irwin, McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile prices in marketing equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):841–890Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko D., Dranove D., Shanley M.The Economics of Strategy. (1996) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Besanko D., Gupta S., Jain D. Logit demand estimation under competitive pricing behavior: An equilibrium framework. Management Sci. (1998) 44(1):1533–1547Link, Google Scholar
• Boulding W., Staelin R. Identifying generalizable effects of strategic actions on firm performance: The case of demand-side returns to R&D spending. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):G222–G236Link, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T., Schmalensee R., Willig R. Industries and market power. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Bucklin R. E., Gupta S. Commercial use of UPC scanner data: Industry and academic perspectives. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):247–273Link, Google Scholar
• Bucklin R. E., Lattin J. A model of product category competition among grocery retailers. J. Retailing (1992) 68(3):271–294Google Scholar
• Carlton D. W., Perloff J. M.Modern Industrial Organization (1994) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Chevalier M., Curhan R. C. Retail promotions as a function of trade promotions. Sloan Management Rev. (1976) Fall):19–32Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P.Investigating category profit maximizing behavior at a retail chain (1999) (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) . Working PaperGoogle Scholar
• Choi S. C. Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(Fall):271–296Link, Google Scholar
• Christen M., Gupta S., Porter J. C., Staelin R., Wittink D. R. Using market-level data to understand promotional effects in a nonlinear model. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(3):322–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cotterill R. W., Putsis W. P. Testing theory: Do assumptions of models of vertical strategic interaction of national and store brands meet the market test?. J. Retailing (2000) Google Scholar
• Cotterill R. W., Putsis W. P. Do models of vertical strategic interaction for national and store brands meet the market test?. J. Retailing (2001) 17:83–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cotterill R. W., Putsis W. P., Dhar R. Assessing the competitive interaction between private labels and national brands. J. Bus. (2000) 73(1):109–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deveney K. Peanut butter makers feel the crunch. Wall Street Journal (1993) September16:B6Google Scholar
• Goldberg P. Imperfect competition in international markets: The case of the US automobile industry. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):891–951Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadagni P. M., Little J. D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2:203–238Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta S., Chintagunta P., Kaul A., Wittink D. Do household scanner data provide representative inferences from brand choices: A comparison with store data. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(4):383–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica (1978) 46:1251–1272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horsky D., Nelson P. New brand positioning and pricing in an oligopolistic market. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(2):133–153Link, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali V. Entry, its deterrence and its accommodation: A study of the U.S. photographic film industry. Rand J. Econom. (1996) 27(3):452–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali V., Chintagunta P., Vilcassim N. Power in manufacturer-retailer interactions: An empirical investigation of pricing in a local market. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(2):127–148Link, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali V., Sudhir K., Rao V. R. Structural analysis of competitive behavior: New empirical organization methods in marketing. Internat. J. Res. Marketing18:161–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali V., Vilcassim N., Chintagunta P. Empirical analysis of intertemporal competitive product line pricing decisions: Lead follow or move together?. J. Bus. (1996) 69(4):459–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali V., Vilcassim N., Chintagunta P. Product line extensions and competitive market interactions: An empirical analysis. J. Econometrics (1999) 89(March/April):339–364Google Scholar
• Kim Byung-Do. Incorporating hetereogeneity with store-level aggregate data. Marketing Letters (1995) 6:159–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee E., Staelin R. Vertical strategic interaction: Implications for channel pricing strategy. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):185–207Link, Google Scholar
• Manning K. C., Bearden W. O., Rose R. L. Development of a theory of retailer response to manufacturers' everyday low cost programs. J. Retailing (1998) 74(1):107–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGuire T., Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(Spring):161–192Link, Google Scholar
• McLaughlin E. W., Hawkes G. F.Category management: Current status and future outlook (1994) (Food Industry Management Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Midgley D. F., Marks R. E., Cooper L. G. Breeding competitive strategies. Management Sci. (1997) 43(March):257–275Link, Google Scholar
• Neslin S. A., Powell S. G., Stone L. S. The effect of retailer and consumer response on optimal manufacturer advertising and trade promotion strategies. Management Sci. (1995) 41(5):749–766Link, Google Scholar
• Nevo A. Measuring market power in the ready to eat cereal industry. Econometrica (1998) 69(2):307–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nichols D. Supermarket promotions: Who's running the store. Incentive (1987) NovemberGoogle Scholar
• Putsis W.P., Dhar R. The many faces of competition. Marketing Lett. (1998) 9(3):269–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putsis W.P., Dhar R.Category expenditure, promotion and competitive market interactions: Can private labels expand the pie? (1999) (London Business School, London, UK) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Quelch J. A., Farris P. W.Cases in Advertising and Promotion Management (1983) (Business Publications Inc., Plano, TX) Google Scholar
• Roy A., Hanssens D. M., Raju J. S. Competitive pricing by a price leader. Management Sci. (1994) 40(7):809–823Link, Google Scholar
• Silva-Risso J. M., Bucklin R. E., Morrison D. G. A decision support system for planning manufacturers' sales promotion calendars. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):274–300Link, Google Scholar
• Slade M. E. Product rivalry and mutliple strategic weapons: An analysis of price and advertising competition. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1995) 4(3):445–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K. Competitive pricing behavior in the auto market: A structural analysis. Marketing Sci.20(1):42–60Link, Google Scholar
• Tellis G. J., Zufryden F. S. Tackling the retailer decision maze: Which brands to discount, how much, when and why? Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):271–289Link, Google Scholar
• Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Tyagi R. K. A characterization of retailer response to manufacturer trade deals. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(10):510–516Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vilcassim N., Kadiyali V., Chintagunta P. Investigating dynamic multifirm market interactions in price and advertising: A conjectural variations approach. Management Sci. (1999) 45(4):499–518Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M., Winer R. S. Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1324–1338Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M., Zhao Y.The ketchup marketplace: Retailer, manufacturers and individual consumers (2000) (University of California, Berkeley, CA) . Working PaperGoogle Scholar
• Vuong Q. H. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypothesis. Econometrica (1989) 57:307–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walters R., MacKenzie S. A structural equations analysis of the impact of price promotions on store performance. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(1):51–63Crossref, Google Scholar