Pizzas: π or Square? Psychophysical Biases in Area Comparisons

References

• Anastasi A. The estimation of area. J. General Psychology (1936) 14:201–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson Norman H., Cuneo Diane O. The height + width rule in children's judgments of quantity. J. Experiment. Psychology: General (1978) 107(4):335–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baird John C., Romer Daniel, Stein Timothy. Test of a cognitive theory of psychophysics: size discrimination. Perceptual Motor Skills (1970) 30(2):495–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacioppo John T., Petty Richard E., Kao Chuan F. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. J. Personality Assessment (1984) 48:306–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacioppo John T., Petty Richard E. The need for cognition. J. Personality Soc. Psychology (1982) 42:116–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken Shelly. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psychology (1980) 39(5):752–766Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croxton F.E., Stein Harold. Graphic comparisons by bars, squares, circles, and cubes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1932) 27:54–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dembo Tamara, Hanfmann Eugenia. Intuitive halving and doubling of figures. Psychologische Forschung (1933) 17:306–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickson Peter, Sawyer Alan. The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. J. Marketing (1990) 54:42–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickson Peter, Sawyer Alan. Point of Purchase Behavior and Price Perceptions of Supermarket Shoppers (1986) 3:42–53MSI Report No. 86-102Google Scholar
• Ekman Gosta. Two generalized ratio scaling methods. J. Psychology (1958) 45:287–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekman Gosta, Junge K. Psychophysical relations in visual perception of length, area and volume. Scandinavian J. Psychology (1961) 2:1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer Gregory W., Carmon Ziv, Ariely Dan, Zauberman Gal. Goal-based construction of preferences: Task goals and the prominence effect. Management Sci. (1999) 45(8):1057–1075Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher Gerald H., Foster Jeremy J. Apparent sizes of different shapes and the facility with which they can be identified. Nature (1968) 219(5154):653–654Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frayman Bruce J., Dawson William E. The effect of object shape and mode of presentation on judgments of apparent volume. Perception Psychophysics (1981) 29(1):56–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghyka Matila. The Geometry of Art and Life (1977) (Dover Publications Inc:, New York) Google Scholar
• Greene William H.Econometric Analysis (1993) (MacMillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Hanes R. M. Some effects of shape on apparent brightness. J. Experiment. Psychology (1950) 40:650–654Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haugtvedt Curtis P., Petty Richard E., Cacioppo John T. Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. J. Consumer Psychology (1992) 1:239–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawkins Scott A. Information processing strategies in riskless preference reversals: The prominence effect. Organizational Behavior Human Decision Processes (1994) 59(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herz-Fischler Roger. The Mathematical History of the Golden Number (1987) (Dover Publications Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Einhorn Hillel J., Hogarth Robin M. Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Ann. Rev. Psychol. (1981) 32:53–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitchcock L., Brown D. R., Michels K. M., Spiritoso T. Stimulus complexity and the judgment of relative size. Perceptual Motor Skills (1962) 14:210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmberg Lennart, Holmberg Ingrid. The perception of the area of rectangles as a function of the ratio between height and width. Psychological Res. Bull. (1969) 9(3):6Google Scholar
• Holmberg Lennart, Holmberg Ingrid, Wahlin Eivor. The influence of elongation on the judgment of the area of certain geometrical figures. Psychological Res. Bull. (1969) 9(1):1–11Google Scholar
• Hsiao Cheng, Matyas Laszlo, Sevestre Patrick. Random coefficient models. Econometrics of Panel Data (1992) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge George G., Griffiths W.E., Hill R. Carter, Lutkepohl Helmut, Lee Tsoung-Chao. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics (1985) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Kahneman Daniel. Reference points anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Special Issue: Decision Processes in Negotiation. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes (1992) 51(2):296–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempler Bernhard. Stimulus correlates of area judgments: A psychophysical developmental study. Developmental Psychology (1971) 4(2):158–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna Aradhna, Raghubir Priya. The effect of line configuration on perceived numerosity of dotted lines. Memory Cognition (1997) 25(4):492–507Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lauer L. Untersuchungen uber die scheinbare Grosse von Korpern. (Investigation of the apparent size of bodies.). Arch. Gesamte Psychologie (1929) 68:295–324Google Scholar
• Maheswaran Durairaj, Chaiken Shelly. Promoting systematic processing in low motivation settings: the effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psychology (1991) 61:13–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansvelt E. Over het schatten der grotte van figuren van verschillenden vorm (On the judgment of the size of figures of different form). Mededeelingen uit het Psychologisch Laboratorium der Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht (1928) 4(II):134–137Google Scholar
• Martinez Nahum, Dawson William E. Ranking of apparent area for different shapes of equal area. Perceptual Motor Skills (1973) 37(3):763–770Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNamara Timothy P. Mental representations of spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology (1986) 18:87–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moyer Robert S., Sorenson Bradley, Mansfield Whiting. Psychophysical functions for perceived and remembered size. Science (1978) 200(4339):330–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nakatini Katsuya. Fixed set in the perception of size in relation to lightness. Perceptual and Motor Skills (1989) 68:415–422Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty Richard E., Cacioppo John T.Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer H. E. Uber die Wirksamkeit verschiedener Figuren gleicher geometrischer Flachengrosse und ihre Beeinflussung durch Helligkeitsunterschiede (On the effectiveness of different figures of the same geometrical). Psychologische Forschung (1932) 17:1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piaget J. Quantification conservation, and nativism. Science (1968) 162:976–979Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piaget J.The Child's Conception of Number (1965) (Norton, New York) . Originally published 1941Google Scholar
• Poffenberger A.T.Psychology in Advertising (1926) (Shaw, New York) 632Google Scholar
• Raghubir Priya, Krishna Aradhna. Vital dimensions in volume perceptions: Can the eye fool the stomach?. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(August):326Google Scholar
• Raghubir Priya, Krishna Aradhna. As the crow flies: Bias in consumers' map-based distance judgments. J. Consumer Res. (1996) 23(June):26–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seashore C.E., Williams M.C. An illusion of length. Univ. Iowa Stud. Psychology (1902) 5:1929–1937Google Scholar
• Shepp B.E., Burns B., McDonough D., Wilkening F., Becker J., Trabasso T. The relation of stimulus structure to perceptual and cognitive development: Further tests of a separability hypothesis. Information Integration by Children (1980) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Smets Gerda. When do two figures seem equal in size?. Perceptual and Motor Skills (1970) 30:1008Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith John P. The effects of figural shape on the perception of area. Perception Psychophysics (1969) 5(1):49–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith John P.The effect of perimeter in massed figure discrimination (1958) (Fordham University). Unpublished Master's thesisGoogle Scholar
• Stevens S.S., Guirao Miguelina. Subjective scaling of length and area and the matching of length to loudness and brightness. J. Experiment. Psychology (1963) 66:177–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teghtsoonian Martha. The judgment of size. Amer. J. Psychology (1965) 78:392–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verge Charles G., Bogartz Richard S. A functional measurement analysis of the development of dimensional coordination in children. J. Experiment. Child Psychology (1978) 25(2):337–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner E. Das abschatzen von flachen. (The judgment of areas). Psychotechnisches Zeitschrift (1931) 6:140–148Google Scholar
• Wansink Brian. Can package size accelerate usage volume?. J. Marketing (1996) 60(3):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warren J. M., Pinneau S.R. Influence of form on judgment of apparent area. Perceptual Motor Skills (1955) 5:7–10Crossref, Google Scholar