A Direct Utility Model for Asymmetric Complements

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0782

References

  • Ailawadi KL, Gedenk K, Lutzky C, Neslin SA. Decomposition of the sales impact of promotion-induced stockpiling. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(3):450–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ainslie A, Rossi PE. Similarities in choice behavior across product categories. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):91–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Basu A, Mazumdar T, Raj SP. Indirect network externality effects on product attributes. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(2):209–221LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg BJ, Kruger MW, Mela CF. Database paper: The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(4):745–748LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chapman RG, Staelin R. Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19(3):288–301CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen LR, Jorgenson DW, Lau LJ. Transcendental logarithmic utility functions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1975) 65(3):367–383Google Scholar
  • Dubé J-P. Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):66–81LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Duvvuri SD, Ansari A, Gupta S. Consumers' price sensitivities across complementary categories. Management Sci. (2007) 53(12):1933–1945LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T. An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):339–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geyer CJ. Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo. Statist. Sci. (1992) 7(4):473–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen K, Singh V, Chintagunta P. Understanding store-brand purchase behavior across categories. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):75–90LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee S, Allenby GM. Modeling indivisible demand. (2013) . Working paper, University of Iowa, Iowa CityGoogle Scholar
  • Li S, Sun B, Wilcox RT. Cross-selling sequentially ordered products: An application to consumer banking services. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(2):233–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P, Ansari A, Gupta S. The “shopping basket:” A model for multicategory purchase incidence decisions. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(2):95–114LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta N. Investigating consumers' purchase incidence and brand choice decisions across multiple product categories: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):196–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nair H, Chintagunta PK, Dubé J-P. Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(1):23–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newton MA, Raftery AE. Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1994) 56(1):3–48Google Scholar
  • Pashigian BP. Price Theory and Applications (1998) (Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Pollak RA, Wales TJ. Demand System Specification and Estimation (1992) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Raftery AE, Lewis SM. [Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo]: Comment: One long run with diagnostics: Implementation strategies for Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Statist. Sci. (1992) 7(4):493–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song I, Chintagunta PK. A discrete-continuous model for multicategory purchase behavior of households. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):595–612CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terui N, Ban M, Allenby GM. The effect of media advertising on brand consideration and choice. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(1):74–91LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.